Re: Maximum files per Directory

2001-05-02 Thread Ketil Froyn
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > cyrus-imapd i ran into problems. > > At about 2^15 files the filesystem gave up, telling me that there cannot be > > more files in a directory. > > > > Is this a vfs-Issue or an ext2-issue? > > Bit of both. You exceeded the max link count, and your

Re: Maximum files per Directory

2001-05-02 Thread Ketil Froyn
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote: cyrus-imapd i ran into problems. At about 2^15 files the filesystem gave up, telling me that there cannot be more files in a directory. Is this a vfs-Issue or an ext2-issue? Bit of both. You exceeded the max link count, and your performance would

oops in uhci.c running 2.4.2-ac28

2001-03-31 Thread Ketil Froyn
Regards, Ketil Froyn - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

oops in uhci.c running 2.4.2-ac28

2001-03-31 Thread Ketil Froyn
fat ufs Kind Regards, Ketil Froyn - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing?

2001-03-15 Thread Ketil Froyn
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Mike A. Harris wrote: > Is the fact that we're supposed to use double the RAM size as > swap a permanent thing or a temporary annoyance that will get > tweaked/fixed in the future at some point during 2.4.x perhaps? You're not supposed to do anything, that's just a general

Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing?

2001-03-15 Thread Ketil Froyn
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Mike A. Harris wrote: Is the fact that we're supposed to use double the RAM size as swap a permanent thing or a temporary annoyance that will get tweaked/fixed in the future at some point during 2.4.x perhaps? You're not supposed to do anything, that's just a general

out of memory?

2001-02-16 Thread Ketil Froyn
$ uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.2.18RAID #6 Wed Feb 14 19:15:49 CET 2001 \ i586 unknown The kernel is compiled with the rh-7.0 kgcc (egcs-2.91.66), and I've patched it to get raid 0.90 and reiserfs 3.5.29. What's going on? How bad is this? Ketil Froyn - To unsubscribe from this list: send

out of memory?

2001-02-16 Thread Ketil Froyn
$ uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.2.18RAID #6 Wed Feb 14 19:15:49 CET 2001 \ i586 unknown The kernel is compiled with the rh-7.0 kgcc (egcs-2.91.66), and I've patched it to get raid 0.90 and reiserfs 3.5.29. What's going on? How bad is this? Ketil Froyn - To unsubscribe from this list: send