need to modify the patches above to
do something different in case EC_FLAGS_CLEAR_ON_RESUME is set?
Regards,
Kieran Clancy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.k
different in case EC_FLAGS_CLEAR_ON_RESUME is set?
Regards,
Kieran Clancy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http
new patch on affected systems.
References: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/532fe3b2.9060...@biereigel-wb.de
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44161#c173
Reported-by: Stefan Biereigel
Signed-off-by: Kieran Clancy
Tested-by: Stefan Biereigel
Tested-by: Dennis Jansen
Tested-by: Nico
on affected systems.
References: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/532fe3b2.9060...@biereigel-wb.de
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44161#c173
Reported-by: Stefan Biereigel ste...@biereigel.de
Signed-off-by: Kieran Clancy clancy.kie...@gmail.com
Tested-by: Stefan Biereigel ste
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Nicolas Porcel
wrote:
> Do you have any idea of how much time will it take to merge it to the
> mainline ?
Apologies for the breakage. The key here is that we want a patch which
works 100% on all Samsung systems. If we rush a fix for this
regression, we may risk
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 1:51 AM, D. G. Jansen wrote:
>
> This patch (processing events) works for me on Samsung 535.
Hi Dennis and others,
Thank you for testing. I have also been testing this patch for a
couple of days, and have not encountered any problems.
I have now submitted a request for
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 1:51 AM, D. G. Jansen d.g.jan...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch (processing events) works for me on Samsung 535.
Hi Dennis and others,
Thank you for testing. I have also been testing this patch for a
couple of days, and have not encountered any problems.
I have now
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Nicolas Porcel
nicolasporce...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have any idea of how much time will it take to merge it to the
mainline ?
Apologies for the breakage. The key here is that we want a patch which
works 100% on all Samsung systems. If we rush a fix for this
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Stefan Biereigel wrote:
> I tested both of your patches. The processing of events works well on my
> N150, the lid is reported open correctly after resume.
> For the second patch (the whitelisting-approach), I had to change the
> Product Name to "N150/N210/N220"
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Stefan Biereigel wrote:
>
> I don't know if it is a valid idea, but maybe it would be ok to process
> events after resume in general, and only throw away events on those
> platforms that continue to log events while in standby (Samsung 5/7/9)?
We can give it a
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Stefan Biereigel ste...@biereigel.de wrote:
I don't know if it is a valid idea, but maybe it would be ok to process
events after resume in general, and only throw away events on those
platforms that continue to log events while in standby (Samsung 5/7/9)?
We
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Stefan Biereigel ste...@biereigel.de wrote:
I tested both of your patches. The processing of events works well on my
N150, the lid is reported open correctly after resume.
For the second patch (the whitelisting-approach), I had to change the
Product Name to
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> 2014-03-24 19:19 GMT+08:00 Stefan Biereigel :
>> Hi,
>> thank you for the suggestion. The patch resolves the issue on my N150
>> when applied to a clean 3.14-rc7. Anyways I'm wondering if similar
>> problems to mine now exist on the Samsung
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Lan Tianyu lantianyu1...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-03-24 19:19 GMT+08:00 Stefan Biereigel secur...@biereigel-wb.de:
Hi,
thank you for the suggestion. The patch resolves the issue on my N150
when applied to a clean 3.14-rc7. Anyways I'm wondering if similar
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, March 06, 2014 11:04:14 AM Kieran Clancy wrote:
>>
>> Rafael, is it a separate process to get this in the stable tree or
>> will it naturally happen after being merged into the mainline?
>
> I need
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Joseph Salisbury
wrote:
> I notice there was no cc to stable. Were you also planning on
> submitting this for inclusion in the upstream stable kernels?
I don't really know the process for stable kernels
(Documentation/SubmittingPatches mentions nothing), but of
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Joseph Salisbury
joseph.salisb...@canonical.com wrote:
I notice there was no cc to stable. Were you also planning on
submitting this for inclusion in the upstream stable kernels?
I don't really know the process for stable kernels
(Documentation/SubmittingPatches
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Thursday, March 06, 2014 11:04:14 AM Kieran Clancy wrote:
Rafael, is it a separate process to get this in the stable tree or
will it naturally happen after being merged into the mainline?
I need to add a proper
/show_bug.cgi?id=45461
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57271
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=126801
Signed-off-by: Kieran Clancy
Suggested-by: Juan Manuel Cabo
Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu
Reviewed-by: Dennis Jansen
Tested-by: Kieran Clancy
Tested
/show_bug.cgi?id=45461
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57271
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=126801
Signed-off-by: Kieran Clancy clancy.kie...@gmail.com
Suggested-by: Juan Manuel Cabo juanmanuel.c...@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu tianyu@intel.com
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Li Guang wrote:
>> +#define ACPI_EC_CLEAR_MAX 20 /* Maximum number of events to
>> query
>> +* when trying to clear the EC */
>>
>
>
> 20 is enough?
> the query index is length of a byte.
On my machine, 8 seems
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, February 27, 2014 11:29:53 AM Kieran Clancy wrote:
>>
>> Oh, and I should add that Juan and Dennis both helped to test the
>> patch extensively.
>
> You can use Tested-by or Reported-and-test
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Kieran Clancy wrote:
>
> I am the primary author, but I based the loop which calls
> acpi_ec_query_unlocked() on a patch by Lan Tianyu. Juan provided the
> initial idea (userspace workaround), and Dennis and Lan Tianyu
> reviewed and suggest
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, February 27, 2014 02:12:40 AM Kieran Clancy wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Kieran Clancy
>> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu
>> Signed-off-by: Juan Manuel Cabo
>> Signed-off-by: Dennis Jansen
>
> T
acpi_ec_clear() on wake, from acpi_ec_unblock_transactions()
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44161
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45461
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57271
Signed-off-by: Kieran Clancy
Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu
Signed
acpi_ec_clear() on wake, from acpi_ec_unblock_transactions()
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44161
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45461
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57271
Signed-off-by: Kieran Clancy clancy.kie...@gmail.com
Signed-off
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 02:12:40 AM Kieran Clancy wrote:
Signed-off-by: Kieran Clancy clancy.kie...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu tianyu@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Juan Manuel Cabo juanmanuel.c
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Kieran Clancy clancy.kie...@gmail.com wrote:
I am the primary author, but I based the loop which calls
acpi_ec_query_unlocked() on a patch by Lan Tianyu. Juan provided the
initial idea (userspace workaround), and Dennis and Lan Tianyu
reviewed and suggested
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 11:29:53 AM Kieran Clancy wrote:
Oh, and I should add that Juan and Dennis both helped to test the
patch extensively.
You can use Tested-by or Reported-and-tested
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Li Guang lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
+#define ACPI_EC_CLEAR_MAX 20 /* Maximum number of events to
query
+* when trying to clear the EC */
20 is enough?
the query index is length of a byte.
On my
30 matches
Mail list logo
