RE: powernow-k8 and non-standard multipliers

2007-11-13 Thread Langsdorf, Mark
> I've just upgraded to an X2 5000+ black edition. This model > doesn't have a multiple lock and I tried bumping the multiplier > up, which is perfectly stable, but which causes powernow-k8 to > fail to load. I also tried with the updated patch you posted > at the beginning of october

RE: powernow-k8 and non-standard multipliers

2007-11-13 Thread Langsdorf, Mark
I've just upgraded to an X2 5000+ black edition. This model doesn't have a multiple lock and I tried bumping the multiplier up, which is perfectly stable, but which causes powernow-k8 to fail to load. I also tried with the updated patch you posted at the beginning of october

RE: [PATCH][try 2] architectural pstate driver for powernow-k8

2007-10-10 Thread Langsdorf, Mark
> > Has this been tested on older implementations of powernow yet? > > I'm happy to merge this and give it some time in -mm, before it > > goes to mainline, but if no-one is testing on those older > > opterons/turions etc then we're not going to know we regressed > > until its too late. If it

RE: [PATCH][try 2] architectural pstate driver for powernow-k8

2007-10-10 Thread Langsdorf, Mark
Has this been tested on older implementations of powernow yet? I'm happy to merge this and give it some time in -mm, before it goes to mainline, but if no-one is testing on those older opterons/turions etc then we're not going to know we regressed until its too late. If it hasn't been

RE: [PATCH] x86: limit mwait_idle to Intel CPUs

2007-04-05 Thread Langsdorf, Mark
> > Commit 991528d7348667924176f3e29addea0675298944 > > introduced mwait_idle which is supposed to work > > for Intel CPUs starting with Core Duo. > > > > AMD Fam10 processors won't enter C1 on mwait. > > Unfortunate. Will this be fixed? Fam10 processors were not designed to enter C1 on mwait.

RE: [PATCH] x86: limit mwait_idle to Intel CPUs

2007-04-05 Thread Langsdorf, Mark
Commit 991528d7348667924176f3e29addea0675298944 introduced mwait_idle which is supposed to work for Intel CPUs starting with Core Duo. AMD Fam10 processors won't enter C1 on mwait. Unfortunate. Will this be fixed? Fam10 processors were not designed to enter C1 on mwait. That feature

RE: System hang on athlon64 cpufreq change

2007-04-02 Thread Langsdorf, Mark
> On 3/16/07, Langsdorf, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The processor is not changing frequency in response to your > > launch of mplayer. The powersave governor forces it to the > > lowest frequency regardless of system load. You really want > > to u

RE: System hang on athlon64 cpufreq change

2007-04-02 Thread Langsdorf, Mark
On 3/16/07, Langsdorf, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The processor is not changing frequency in response to your launch of mplayer. The powersave governor forces it to the lowest frequency regardless of system load. You really want to use ondemand for dynamic frequency scaling

RE: [PATCH] i386: add command line option "local_apic_timer_c2_ok"

2007-03-29 Thread Langsdorf, Mark
> > If we really care about using the LAPIC timer on systems with deeper > > than C1 support, the only alternative seems to be to test > > if it actually works or not at boot and run-time. > > Otherwise, we wait for future hardware with guaranteed > > not to break under any (BIOS) conditions

RE: [PATCH] i386: add command line option local_apic_timer_c2_ok

2007-03-29 Thread Langsdorf, Mark
If we really care about using the LAPIC timer on systems with deeper than C1 support, the only alternative seems to be to test if it actually works or not at boot and run-time. Otherwise, we wait for future hardware with guaranteed not to break under any (BIOS) conditions ships, and

RE: System hang on athlon64 cpufreq change

2007-03-16 Thread Langsdorf, Mark
> My kernel boots up with performance cpufreq governor, thus setting > frequency to 2hgz. Then I change it to powersave governor, thus > setting frequency to 1ghz just like that: > > echo powersave > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor > > Everything works well. Then I launch

RE: System hang on athlon64 cpufreq change

2007-03-16 Thread Langsdorf, Mark
My kernel boots up with performance cpufreq governor, thus setting frequency to 2hgz. Then I change it to powersave governor, thus setting frequency to 1ghz just like that: echo powersave /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor Everything works well. Then I launch mplayer

RE: Slower CPU frequency reported by the kernel

2007-02-06 Thread Langsdorf, Mark
> > I'm using a PC with AMD 64 3000+ cpu which is theoricaly running at > > 2Ghz. But when looking at /proc/cpuinfo, the kernel reports that it > > runs only at 1Ghz: > > ... > > What's going wrong ? > > Do you have feature called "Cool N' Quiet" enabled in BIOS? > I had the same problem and

RE: Slower CPU frequency reported by the kernel

2007-02-06 Thread Langsdorf, Mark
I'm using a PC with AMD 64 3000+ cpu which is theoricaly running at 2Ghz. But when looking at /proc/cpuinfo, the kernel reports that it runs only at 1Ghz: ... What's going wrong ? Do you have feature called Cool N' Quiet enabled in BIOS? I had the same problem and disabling the

RE: Understanding cpufreq?

2007-01-09 Thread Langsdorf, Mark
> These machines are running a 2.6.9-42 RHEL4 kernel with the > powernow-k8 module loaded - which I believe have backported > cpufreq support from more recent mainline kernels. To an extent. The problem is not the powernow-k8 driver, but the cpufreq infrastructure. See below. > In trying to

RE: Understanding cpufreq?

2007-01-09 Thread Langsdorf, Mark
These machines are running a 2.6.9-42 RHEL4 kernel with the powernow-k8 module loaded - which I believe have backported cpufreq support from more recent mainline kernels. To an extent. The problem is not the powernow-k8 driver, but the cpufreq infrastructure. See below. In trying to