Re: Asus a8v-e Deluxe lockups

2005-08-27 Thread Lawrence Walton
Alexey Dobriyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 02:48:55PM -0700, Lawrence Walton wrote: > > I just switched out motherboards and CPUs From a Asus K8v SE Deluxe > > to a to a Asus A8V-E Deluxe, and a 754 pin 3200+ to a 934 pin 3200+. > > I am now havin

Re: Asus a8v-e Deluxe lockups

2005-08-27 Thread Lawrence Walton
Alexey Dobriyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 02:48:55PM -0700, Lawrence Walton wrote: I just switched out motherboards and CPUs From a Asus K8v SE Deluxe to a to a Asus A8V-E Deluxe, and a 754 pin 3200+ to a 934 pin 3200+. I am now having some fairly serious instability

Asus a8v-e Deluxe lockups

2005-08-25 Thread Lawrence Walton
Hi! I just switched out motherboards and CPUs From a Asus K8v SE Deluxe to a to a Asus A8V-E Deluxe, and a 754 pin 3200+ to a 934 pin 3200+. I am now having some fairly serious instability issues. The system locks up completely with no oops. After disabling CONFIGHIMEM and

Asus a8v-e Deluxe lockups

2005-08-25 Thread Lawrence Walton
Hi! I just switched out motherboards and CPUs From a Asus K8v SE Deluxe to a to a Asus A8V-E Deluxe, and a 754 pin 3200+ to a 934 pin 3200+. I am now having some fairly serious instability issues. The system locks up completely with no oops. After disabling CONFIGHIMEM and

Re: SysKonnect sk98lin Gigabit lan missing in action from 2.6.10 on

2005-02-04 Thread Lawrence Walton
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > maxer wrote: > >What is the status of sk98lin? Do we have to wait until Syskonnect gets > >their act together > >and write a new driver for 2.6.10? > > > >Their latest is Oct 2004 and not at all compatible with 2.6.10 and beyond. > > I've been telling

Re: SysKonnect sk98lin Gigabit lan missing in action from 2.6.10 on

2005-02-04 Thread Lawrence Walton
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: maxer wrote: What is the status of sk98lin? Do we have to wait until Syskonnect gets their act together and write a new driver for 2.6.10? Their latest is Oct 2004 and not at all compatible with 2.6.10 and beyond. I've been telling SysKonnect for

2.4.2-ac21

2001-03-22 Thread Lawrence Walton
Hello all 2.4.2-ac21 seems to have a couple problems. First the fs was acting very strangely, while compiling; the compiler complained about being unable to find files and directory's that existed. I was able to cd to those directory's and see the files with ls, (I was recompiling ac20 at the

2.4.2-ac21

2001-03-22 Thread Lawrence Walton
Hello all 2.4.2-ac21 seems to have a couple problems. First the fs was acting very strangely, while compiling; the compiler complained about being unable to find files and directory's that existed. I was able to cd to those directory's and see the files with ls, (I was recompiling ac20 at the

Samba seems to be broken in 2.4.1-ac14

2001-02-15 Thread Lawrence Walton
Samba appears to be broken in 2.4.1-ac14 No odd dmesg, modules load fine just nothing is there. Works in 2.4.1-ac7 just fine. Versions follow Samba version 2.0.7 If some fields are empty or look unusual you may have an old version. Compare to the current minimal requirements in

Samba seems to be broken in 2.4.1-ac14

2001-02-15 Thread Lawrence Walton
Samba appears to be broken in 2.4.1-ac14 No odd dmesg, modules load fine just nothing is there. Works in 2.4.1-ac7 just fine. Versions follow Samba version 2.0.7 If some fields are empty or look unusual you may have an old version. Compare to the current minimal requirements in

oops 2.4.0 pre3

2000-12-27 Thread Lawrence Walton
I was doing nothing out of the ordinary wen my system froze. Here is the oops Yes that is the correct system map btw. If anyone needs anything more please ask. ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.4.0-test13-pre3. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default)

oops 2.4.0 pre3

2000-12-27 Thread Lawrence Walton
I was doing nothing out of the ordinary wen my system froze. Here is the oops Yes that is the correct system map btw. If anyone needs anything more please ask. ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.4.0-test13-pre3. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default)

Re: corruption

2000-12-01 Thread Lawrence Walton
Andrew Morton [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > I bet this'll catch it: > > > > > > --- include/linux/list.h.orig Fri Dec 1 08:33:36 2000 > > > +++ include/linux/list.hFri Dec 1 08:33:55 2000 > > > @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ > > >

Re: corruption

2000-12-01 Thread Lawrence Walton
Andrew Morton [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: I bet this'll catch it: --- include/linux/list.h.orig Fri Dec 1 08:33:36 2000 +++ include/linux/list.hFri Dec 1 08:33:55 2000 @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ static __inline__ void

File corruption part deux

2000-11-29 Thread Lawrence Walton
my system has been acting slightly odd on all the pre 12 kernels with the fs going read only with out any messages until now. no opps or anything like that, but I did get this just now. Nov 29 16:03:12 the-penguin kernel: EXT2-fs error (device sd(8,2)): ext2_readdir: bad entry in directory

File corruption part deux

2000-11-29 Thread Lawrence Walton
my system has been acting slightly odd on all the pre 12 kernels with the fs going read only with out any messages until now. no opps or anything like that, but I did get this just now. Nov 29 16:03:12 the-penguin kernel: EXT2-fs error (device sd(8,2)): ext2_readdir: bad entry in directory

SCSI cdrom is broken in 2.4.0-test8-pre5

2000-09-06 Thread Lawrence Walton
It appears that SCSI cdroms as modules are broken in 2.4.0-test8. It works fine 2.4.0-test7. cat /dev/scd0 cat: /dev/scd0: No such device Module Size Used by isofs 20168 0 (autoclean) sg 21712 0 (unused) sr_mod 13224

SCSI cdrom is broken in 2.4.0-test8-pre5

2000-09-06 Thread Lawrence Walton
It appears that SCSI cdroms as modules are broken in 2.4.0-test8. It works fine 2.4.0-test7. cat /dev/scd0 cat: /dev/scd0: No such device Module Size Used by isofs 20168 0 (autoclean) sg 21712 0 (unused) sr_mod 13224