Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps

2001-06-06 Thread Marc Heckmann
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 12:16:30PM +1000, Andrew Morton wrote: > "Jeffrey W. Baker" wrote: > > > > Because the 2.4 VM is so broken, and > > because my machines are frequently deeply swapped, > > The swapoff algorithms in 2.2 and 2.4 are basically identical. > The problem *appears* worse in 2.4

Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps

2001-06-06 Thread Marc Heckmann
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 12:16:30PM +1000, Andrew Morton wrote: Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: Because the 2.4 VM is so broken, and because my machines are frequently deeply swapped, The swapoff algorithms in 2.2 and 2.4 are basically identical. The problem *appears* worse in 2.4 because it

Re: OOPS on bringing down ppp

2000-11-24 Thread Marc Heckmann
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 10:55:39AM +, Mark Ellis wrote: > Hi all, consistently getting the following when pppd is terminated. Happens > in 2.4.0-test11, fine in 2.4.0-test9, don't know about test10. Same happens > for pppd 2.4.0b4 and 2.4.0, both recompiled for test11. Is this related to >

Re: OOPS on bringing down ppp

2000-11-24 Thread Marc Heckmann
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 10:55:39AM +, Mark Ellis wrote: Hi all, consistently getting the following when pppd is terminated. Happens in 2.4.0-test11, fine in 2.4.0-test9, don't know about test10. Same happens for pppd 2.4.0b4 and 2.4.0, both recompiled for test11. Is this related to the