Re: SMP module compilation on UP?

2001-06-13 Thread Mark Mokryn
Rafael Herrera wrote: > > Mark Mokryn wrote: > > Is it possible to build an SMP module on a machine running a UP kernel > > (or vice versa)? We of course get unresolved symbols during module load > > due to the smp prefix on the ksyms, and haven't seen how to get around &

SMP module compilation on UP?

2001-06-13 Thread Mark Mokryn
Hi, Is it possible to build an SMP module on a machine running a UP kernel (or vice versa)? We of course get unresolved symbols during module load due to the smp prefix on the ksyms, and haven't seen how to get around it. (Defining __SMP__ does not cut it, though I believe this used to work a

SMP module compilation on UP?

2001-06-13 Thread Mark Mokryn
Hi, Is it possible to build an SMP module on a machine running a UP kernel (or vice versa)? We of course get unresolved symbols during module load due to the smp prefix on the ksyms, and haven't seen how to get around it. (Defining __SMP__ does not cut it, though I believe this used to work a

Re: SMP module compilation on UP?

2001-06-13 Thread Mark Mokryn
Rafael Herrera wrote: Mark Mokryn wrote: Is it possible to build an SMP module on a machine running a UP kernel (or vice versa)? We of course get unresolved symbols during module load due to the smp prefix on the ksyms, and haven't seen how to get around it. (Defining __SMP__ does

ioremap_nocache problem?

2001-01-23 Thread Mark Mokryn
ioremap_nocache does the following: return __ioremap(offset, size, _PAGE_PCD); However, in drivers/char/mem.c (2.4.0), we see the following: /* On PPro and successors, PCD alone doesn't always mean uncached because of interactions with the MTRRs. PCD | PWT