On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:29:47PM +0100, Markus Rechberger wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Robert Hancock
>> wrote:
>> > On 08/02/14 03:00 AM, Markus Rechberger wrote:
>> >>
>> >&g
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Robert Hancock wrote:
> On 08/02/14 03:00 AM, Markus Rechberger wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, David Laight
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Markus Rechberger
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dec 27
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Robert Hancock hancock...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/02/14 03:00 AM, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, David Laight david.lai...@aculab.com
wrote:
From: Markus Rechberger
Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.118245] xhci_hcd :00
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:29:47PM +0100, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Robert Hancock hancock...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 08/02/14 03:00 AM, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014
is in the usbcore.
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Markus Rechberger
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, David Laight wrote:
>> From: Markus Rechberger
>>> >> Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.118245] xhci_hcd :00:14.0:
>>> >&g
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Markus Rechberger
>> >> Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.118245] xhci_hcd :00:14.0:
>> >> ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA
>> ptr
>> >
>> > These messages might be harmless. T
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, David Laight david.lai...@aculab.com wrote:
From: Markus Rechberger
Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.118245] xhci_hcd :00:14.0:
ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA
ptr
These messages might be harmless. The 3.0 kernel contains a fix for
Intel Panther
is in the usbcore.
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Markus Rechberger
mrechber...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, David Laight david.lai...@aculab.com wrote:
From: Markus Rechberger
Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.118245] xhci_hcd :00:14.0:
ERROR Transfer event
Hi Sarah,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Sarah Sharp
wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> I'm the xHCI driver maintainer, and it helps to Cc me on USB 3.0 bug
> reports.
>
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 07:24:20AM +0100, Markus Rechberger wrote:
>> just received following log snippset
Hi Sarah,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Sarah Sharp
sarah.a.sh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi Markus,
I'm the xHCI driver maintainer, and it helps to Cc me on USB 3.0 bug
reports.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 07:24:20AM +0100, Markus Rechberger wrote:
just received following log snippset
, Dec 27, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Markus Rechberger
wrote:
> Seems like DH87RL was working with 3.2.0-55-generic-pae unfortunately
> we don't have such a board for testing and customer patience is
> limited to bisect the kernel.
>
> Does anyone have a clue what modification could have killed US
.
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Markus Rechberger
wrote:
> I just got another USB 3.0 bugreport, the entire system crashed. That
> particular customer already filed a bugreport in November 2013 that
> his system is in a bad state when using some USB 2.0 media devices
> which even hav
to be a disaster with Linux 3.6.12.
The affected board is an Intel DH87RL board.
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Markus Rechberger
wrote:
> A customer using a device with USBDEVFS is reporting following
> backtrace (it seems to be a rather generic issue related to linux usb
> 3.0 i
to be a disaster with Linux 3.6.12.
The affected board is an Intel DH87RL board.
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Markus Rechberger
mrechber...@gmail.com wrote:
A customer using a device with USBDEVFS is reporting following
backtrace (it seems to be a rather generic issue related to linux usb
3.0
.
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Markus Rechberger
mrechber...@gmail.com wrote:
I just got another USB 3.0 bugreport, the entire system crashed. That
particular customer already filed a bugreport in November 2013 that
his system is in a bad state when using some USB 2.0 media devices
which
, Dec 27, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Markus Rechberger
mrechber...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems like DH87RL was working with 3.2.0-55-generic-pae unfortunately
we don't have such a board for testing and customer patience is
limited to bisect the kernel.
Does anyone have a clue what modification could have killed
A customer using a device with USBDEVFS is reporting following
backtrace (it seems to be a rather generic issue related to linux usb
3.0 in general):
According to him this problem is reproducible as soon as he starts the
data transfer, is there anything known about that?
He is using
A customer using a device with USBDEVFS is reporting following
backtrace (it seems to be a rather generic issue related to linux usb
3.0 in general):
According to him this problem is reproducible as soon as he starts the
data transfer, is there anything known about that?
He is using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus, I see you were accidentally left off the cc: list on this bug.
The change was yours, so I suspect you'll have an opinion to share with
LKML.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus, I see you were accidentally left off the cc: list on this bug.
The change was yours, so I suspect you'll have an opinion to share with
LKML.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux
Hi,
did anyone already take care about:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg55641.html
the fix seems to paper the issue although it happened with other
people too now, so I wonder if there's any progress in that area?
thanks & have a nice Christmas,
Markus
On Dec 23, 2007 8:24 AM,
Hi,
did anyone already take care about:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg55641.html
the fix seems to paper the issue although it happened with other
people too now, so I wonder if there's any progress in that area?
thanks have a nice Christmas,
Markus
On Dec 23, 2007 8:24 AM,
On 11/21/07, Laurent Pinchart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> > On 11/21/07, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> > > > > > it'
On 11/21/07, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
>
> > > > it's not just usb_set_interface that hangs actually.
> > > > It seems to hang at
> > > >
> > > > wait_event(usb_kill_urb_queue, a
On 11/21/07, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 21 November 2007 schrieb Markus Rechberger:
> > > Which URB is usb_kill_urb() called for?
> > >
> >
> > it's the usb_control_message which calls usb_kill_urb if I haven't got
> >
On 11/21/07, Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/21/07, Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11/21/07, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch 21 November 2007 schrieb Markus Rechberger:
> > > >
On 11/21/07, Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/21/07, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch 21 November 2007 schrieb Markus Rechberger:
> > > On 11/21/07, Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
On 11/21/07, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 21 November 2007 schrieb Markus Rechberger:
> > On 11/21/07, Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 11/21/07, Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On 11/21/07, Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/21/07, Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Markus Rechberger wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm looking at the linux uvc driver, and noticed after resuming my
> > ..
>
On 11/21/07, Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/21/07, Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at the linux uvc driver, and noticed after resuming my
..
Pardon me.. what is the uvc driver? Which module/source file
On 11/21/07, Oliver Neukum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch 21 November 2007 schrieb Markus Rechberger:
On 11/21/07, Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/21/07, Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at the linux uvc
On 11/21/07, Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/21/07, Oliver Neukum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch 21 November 2007 schrieb Markus Rechberger:
On 11/21/07, Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/21/07, Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus
On 11/21/07, Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/21/07, Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/21/07, Oliver Neukum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch 21 November 2007 schrieb Markus Rechberger:
On 11/21/07, Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11
On 11/21/07, Oliver Neukum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch 21 November 2007 schrieb Markus Rechberger:
Which URB is usb_kill_urb() called for?
it's the usb_control_message which calls usb_kill_urb if I haven't got
it wrong. (if you're looking for some other information please let
On 11/21/07, Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
it's not just usb_set_interface that hangs actually.
It seems to hang at
wait_event(usb_kill_urb_queue, atomic_read(urb-use_count) == 0);
in drivers/usb/core/urb.c after
On 11/21/07, Laurent Pinchart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 21 November 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 11/21/07, Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
it's not just usb_set_interface that hangs actually.
It seems to hang
On 11/21/07, Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Markus Rechberger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm looking at the linux uvc driver, and noticed after resuming my
> ..
>
> Pardon me.. what is the "uvc" driver? Which module/source file is that?
>
h
Hi,
I'm looking at the linux uvc driver, and noticed after resuming my
notebook it deadlocks at usb_set_interface.
The linux kernel version on that notebook is 2.6.21.4, I searched
around and haven't found any such bugreports.
I wonder if anyone has ever heard about such a problem?
I'm digging
Hi,
I'm looking at the linux uvc driver, and noticed after resuming my
notebook it deadlocks at usb_set_interface.
The linux kernel version on that notebook is 2.6.21.4, I searched
around and haven't found any such bugreports.
I wonder if anyone has ever heard about such a problem?
I'm digging
On 11/21/07, Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at the linux uvc driver, and noticed after resuming my
..
Pardon me.. what is the uvc driver? Which module/source file is that?
http://linux-uvc.berlios.de/ it's not yet included in the kernel
On 10/14/07, Hans Verkuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 14 October 2007 12:40:35 Markus Rechberger wrote:
> > On 10/11/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:00:39 +0200
> > > "Markus Rechberger" <[EM
On 10/11/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:00:39 +0200
> "Markus Rechberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please don't send 900 line emails to which you have added only an additional
> paragraph.
>
> &g
On 10/11/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:00:39 +0200
Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't send 900 line emails to which you have added only an additional
paragraph.
drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-core.c |1
On 10/14/07, Hans Verkuil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 14 October 2007 12:40:35 Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 10/11/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:00:39 +0200
Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't send 900 line emails to which
On 10/11/07, Marcel Siegert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Markus Rechberger schrieb:
> > On 10/11/07, Marcel Siegert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Markus Rechberger schrieb:
> >>> On 10/11/07, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
On 10/11/07, Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aidan Thornton wrote:
> > I looked at this recently, and I'm not sure the core em28xx code was
> > really that different (at least, pre-userspace). Most of the core
> > changes seemed to be related to Markus' driver having (semi-working)
> >
On 10/11/07, Marcel Siegert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Markus Rechberger schrieb:
> > On 10/11/07, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Markus Rechberger a écrit :
> >>> On 10/11/07, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
On 10/11/07, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Markus Rechberger a écrit :
> > On 10/11/07, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> As such, the old and decrepit em28xx driver seems more useful to people,
> >> since at least it supports
On 10/11/07, Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger a écrit :
On 10/11/07, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As such, the old and decrepit em28xx driver seems more useful to people,
since at least it supports the limited set of hardware on its own.
it does
On 10/11/07, Marcel Siegert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger schrieb:
On 10/11/07, Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger a écrit :
On 10/11/07, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As such, the old and decrepit em28xx driver seems more useful to
people
On 10/11/07, Pádraig Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aidan Thornton wrote:
I looked at this recently, and I'm not sure the core em28xx code was
really that different (at least, pre-userspace). Most of the core
changes seemed to be related to Markus' driver having (semi-working)
VBI
On 10/11/07, Marcel Siegert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger schrieb:
On 10/11/07, Marcel Siegert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger schrieb:
On 10/11/07, Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger a écrit :
On 10/11/07, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 10/11/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 07:09:47 +0200 "Markus Rechberger"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 10/11/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:00:39 +0200
On 10/11/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:00:39 +0200
> "Markus Rechberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please don't send 900 line emails to which you have added only an additional
> paragraph.
>
> &g
On 10/11/07, Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/10/2007 07:24 PM, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> >
> > To point to more changes within the available driver which hasn't been
> merged
> > within the last 1 1/2 years:
> > * it supports non usbaudio ba
On 10/11/07, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> >
> > the chances of the em28xx are not accepted from my side since the latest
> code
> > which supports way more hardware is offtree for various reaso
On 10/11/07, Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/10/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Linus,
> >
> > Please pull from:
> >
> ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/v4l-dvb.git
> > master
>
On 10/10/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Linus,
>
> Please pull from:
> ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/v4l-dvb.git
> master
>
> We have 300+ patches this time, covering lots of drivers improvements and
> fixes.
>
> Also, there are several
On 10/10/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linus,
Please pull from:
ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/v4l-dvb.git
master
We have 300+ patches this time, covering lots of drivers improvements and
fixes.
Also, there are several core changes:
On 10/11/07, Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linus,
Please pull from:
ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/v4l-dvb.git
master
We have 300+ patches this time, covering lots of drivers
On 10/11/07, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
the chances of the em28xx are not accepted from my side since the latest
code
which supports way more hardware is offtree for various reasons.
Well, I've talked to various people
On 10/11/07, Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/2007 07:24 PM, Markus Rechberger wrote:
To point to more changes within the available driver which hasn't been
merged
within the last 1 1/2 years:
* it supports non usbaudio based video devices.
* has support for dvb-t/atsc
On 10/11/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:00:39 +0200
Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't send 900 line emails to which you have added only an additional
paragraph.
drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-core.c |1
On 10/11/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 07:09:47 +0200 Markus Rechberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/11/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:00:39 +0200
Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't send 900
On 9/18/07, Jelle Foks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Markus Rechberger wrote:
> > On 9/14/07, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:17:05AM +0200, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> >>> what stops vendors of using the curren
On 9/18/07, Jelle Foks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 9/14/07, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:17:05AM +0200, Markus Rechberger wrote:
what stops vendors of using the current existing code to achieve that
goal. They could provide binary
Hi,
On 9/17/07, Ram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I am trying to write a driver which uses double, float. I am using
> an arm11 with gcc 3.4.4
>
>When i try to compile my modules (with float variables) i get the error
>
>WARNING: "__extendsfdf2" undefined!
>WARNING:
On 9/15/07, Bernard Jungen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:04:42AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > With respect to your kernel-userspace API for xc3028, you made something
> > that seemed to be a dream: there's a consensus: not a single developer
> > believed that
On 9/15/07, Bernard Jungen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:04:42AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
With respect to your kernel-userspace API for xc3028, you made something
that seemed to be a dream: there's a consensus: not a single developer
believed that this is
Hi,
On 9/17/07, Ram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to write a driver which uses double, float. I am using
an arm11 with gcc 3.4.4
When i try to compile my modules (with float variables) i get the error
WARNING: __extendsfdf2 undefined!
WARNING: __mulsf3undefined!
On 9/15/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Everyone knows that there are some issues even some internal
> > ones which I'm not part of.
>
> With respect to your kernel-userspace API for xc3028, you made something
> that seemed to be a dream: there's a consensus: not a single
On 9/15/07, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> >
> > it gets me thinking. Some core developers who I met during
> > the last few weeks (kernel summit, suse conference in czech)
> > told me to go on w
On 9/15/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The main discussion in this thread was about drivers in userspace
> > are bad because the API will allow binary drivers.
>
> No. The focus is that userspace API is not needed at all, and the
> community believe that this is a
On 9/15/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main discussion in this thread was about drivers in userspace
are bad because the API will allow binary drivers.
No. The focus is that userspace API is not needed at all, and the
community believe that this is a regression from
On 9/15/07, Johannes Stezenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
it gets me thinking. Some core developers who I met during
the last few weeks (kernel summit, suse conference in czech)
told me to go on with it actually because the final plan isn't
On 9/15/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Everyone knows that there are some issues even some internal
ones which I'm not part of.
With respect to your kernel-userspace API for xc3028, you made something
that seemed to be a dream: there's a consensus: not a single developer
On 9/14/07, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> >
> > people do contribute to the em28xx project.
> ...
> > there's also an active and even problem solving oriented ML available:
> > http://mcentr
On 9/14/07, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> >
> > people do contribute to the em28xx project.
> ...
> > there's also an active and even problem solving oriented ML available:
> > http://mcentr
On 9/14/07, Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/14/07, Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/14/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:57:59AM +0400, Manu Ab
On 9/14/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Markus,
>
> > >
> > > Maybe you still don't realize how tiresome it is to talk to you.
> > > What you present as "linuxtv people block my contributions" is
> > > IMHO "linuxtv people got fed up talking to you". Because when
> > >
On 9/14/07, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> > On 9/14/07, Steven Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > If you care about LinuxTV you'll work with the core subsystem developers
> &g
On 9/14/07, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:17:05AM +0200, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> > what stops vendors of using the current existing code to achieve that
> > goal. They could provide binary drivers with the existing API.
>
> If y
On 9/14/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:57:59AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
> > What do you think about IOMMU?
> >
> >
> Just because AMD or INTEL want to invent some whizzy new technology it
> doesn't say
On 9/14/07, Steven Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Markus Rechberger wrote:
> > On 9/13/07, Steven Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>>> Also there is to consider a non technical aspect, whether vendors will
> >>>> misuse th
On 9/14/07, Steven Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 9/13/07, Steven Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also there is to consider a non technical aspect, whether vendors will
misuse this interface for binary only, undermining the efforts put in
for OSS drivers
On 9/14/07, Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:57:59AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
What do you think about IOMMU?
Just because AMD or INTEL want to invent some whizzy new technology it
doesn't say anything about the TV card development
On 9/14/07, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:17:05AM +0200, Markus Rechberger wrote:
what stops vendors of using the current existing code to achieve that
goal. They could provide binary drivers with the existing API.
If you feel lucky about the GPL
What stops
On 9/14/07, Johannes Stezenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 9/14/07, Steven Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you care about LinuxTV you'll work with the core subsystem developers
to bring your em28xx tree inline. If you don't care then why
On 9/14/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus,
Maybe you still don't realize how tiresome it is to talk to you.
What you present as linuxtv people block my contributions is
IMHO linuxtv people got fed up talking to you. Because when
people disagree with you,
On 9/14/07, Alex Deucher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/14/07, Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/14/07, Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:57:59AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
What do you think about IOMMU?
Just
On 9/14/07, Johannes Stezenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
people do contribute to the em28xx project.
...
there's also an active and even problem solving oriented ML available:
http://mcentral.de/pipermail/em28xx/
Also if you look
On 9/14/07, Johannes Stezenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
people do contribute to the em28xx project.
...
there's also an active and even problem solving oriented ML available:
http://mcentral.de/pipermail/em28xx/
Also if you look
On 9/13/07, Steven Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >> Also there is to consider a non technical aspect, whether vendors will
> >> misuse this interface for binary only, undermining the efforts put in
> >> for OSS drivers.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > What holds companies for using the current
On 9/13/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Markus Rechberger wrote:
> > On 9/13/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> It's only a step in development, I do not intend to keep the kernel
> >>> stub in the end, but I do
On 9/13/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It's only a step in development, I do not intend to keep the kernel
> > stub in the end, but I do intend to keep and use the userspace drivers
> > with i2c-dev in the long run, this requires a v4l/dvb library at the front
> > of everything.
On 9/13/07, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> > Let's add the LKML to this.
> >
> > On 9/13/07, Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 9/12/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMA
Hi,
On 9/13/07, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> >
> > We currently have an implementation that works, although
> > it works by downloading several firmwares for several devices
> > or even several c
Hi,
On 9/13/07, Johannes Stezenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
We currently have an implementation that works, although
it works by downloading several firmwares for several devices
or even several countries. This is not what I want to have
On 9/13/07, Johannes Stezenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
Let's add the LKML to this.
On 9/13/07, Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/12/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see any technical reason
On 9/13/07, Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's only a step in development, I do not intend to keep the kernel
stub in the end, but I do intend to keep and use the userspace drivers
with i2c-dev in the long run, this requires a v4l/dvb library at the front
of everything.
Well,
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
