On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ahh, it seems to be a alpine bug. Probably brought on by alpine trying to
highlight the web addresses.
It doesn't always happen - between Rank 3 and Rank 4, you have an empty
line, and alpine reacted correctly to that one, but the "empty" line
between
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ahh, it seems to be a alpine bug. Probably brought on by alpine trying to
highlight the web addresses.
It doesn't always happen - between Rank 3 and Rank 4, you have an empty
line, and alpine reacted correctly to that one, but the empty line
between
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 18:31 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> [NETFILTER]: conntrack: fix {nf,ip}_ct_iterate_cleanup endless loops
>
> {nf,ip}_ct_iterate_cleanup iterate over the unconfirmed list for cleaning
> up conntrack entries, which is wrong for multiple reasons:
>
> - unconfirmed entries
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 18:31 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
[NETFILTER]: conntrack: fix {nf,ip}_ct_iterate_cleanup endless loops
{nf,ip}_ct_iterate_cleanup iterate over the unconfirmed list for cleaning
up conntrack entries, which is wrong for multiple reasons:
- unconfirmed entries can not
ing made the patch below, it has
been tested successfully by Bernhard Schmidt. (Netfilter bugzilla #528)
Check the return value of nfct_nat() in device_cmp(), we might very well
have non NAT conntrack entries as well.
Signed-off-by: Martin Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.
conntrack entries as well.
Signed-off-by: Martin Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.20-rc3/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_MASQUERADE.c.orig 2007-01-02
22:47:14.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc3/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_MASQUERADE.c2007-01-02
22:57:11.0 +0100
@@ -127,10 +127,13
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 20:50 +0200, iSteve wrote:
> Greetings,
> in past few days, I've been trying to obtain certian information about
> behavior of e100 NIC driver with my minipci card. My first hit was the
> contact information mentioned in the header of e100.c, that is, "Linux
> NICS <[EMAIL
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 20:50 +0200, iSteve wrote:
Greetings,
in past few days, I've been trying to obtain certian information about
behavior of e100 NIC driver with my minipci card. My first hit was the
contact information mentioned in the header of e100.c, that is, Linux
NICS [EMAIL
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 15:26 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using an IBM Thinkpad X31. With stock 2.6.11 and the additional
> radeontool to power-off the backlight in suspend, S3 works very well
> and reliable. During S3 I've measured a power consumption of 1400
> to 1500 mWh (using
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 15:26 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Hi,
I'm using an IBM Thinkpad X31. With stock 2.6.11 and the additional
radeontool to power-off the backlight in suspend, S3 works very well
and reliable. During S3 I've measured a power consumption of 1400
to 1500 mWh (using 512
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 12:56 -0600, Steve Bergman wrote:
> I have a large rule set (~53000 rules) that I sometimes load using
> iptables-restore. (It takes almost an hour.
>
> Googling around tells me that the loop detection code in the kernel is
> slow with large rule sets. The only thing
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 12:56 -0600, Steve Bergman wrote:
I have a large rule set (~53000 rules) that I sometimes load using
iptables-restore. (It takes almost an hour.
Googling around tells me that the loop detection code in the kernel is
slow with large rule sets. The only thing that
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This mornings magic numbers are:
> >
> > 3
> > ip_dst_cache1292 1485256 151
>
> I just did a q-n-d test here: send one UDP frame to 1.1.1.1 up to
> 1.1.255.255. The ip_dst_cache grew
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This mornings magic numbers are:
3
ip_dst_cache1292 1485256 151
I just did a q-n-d test here: send one UDP frame to 1.1.1.1 up to
1.1.255.255. The ip_dst_cache grew to ~15k entries
On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 22:51 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> I'm seeing a problem with TCP as accessed through KMail (SuSE 9.2, x86_64).
> But oddly enough, only for sending mail, not reading it; and not through
> other (reading) applications... it's a regression with respect to rc1 and
> earlier
On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 22:51 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
I'm seeing a problem with TCP as accessed through KMail (SuSE 9.2, x86_64).
But oddly enough, only for sending mail, not reading it; and not through
other (reading) applications... it's a regression with respect to rc1 and
earlier
On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 18:38 -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > Distribution: Debian
> > Hardware Environment: Pentum III 733 MHz
> > Software Environment: Debian Sid
> > Problem Description:
> > While starting open Office crashes, it did not happend on 2.6.10, but
> > happend on
> > 2.6.11. rc1 and
On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 18:38 -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
Distribution: Debian
Hardware Environment: Pentum III 733 MHz
Software Environment: Debian Sid
Problem Description:
While starting open Office crashes, it did not happend on 2.6.10, but
happend on
2.6.11. rc1 and rc2. The only
On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 18:54 -0500, sean wrote:
> I'm compiling with NAT, and get a different problem:
>
>LD net/ipv4/netfilter/built-in.o
> net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_nat_tftp.o(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of
> `ip_nat_tftp_hook'
> net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_tftp.o(.bss+0x0): first
On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 12:57 -0800, Udo A. Steinberg wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:04:29 +0100 Martin Josefsson (MJ) wrote:
>
> MJ> On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 22:32 -0800, Udo A. Steinberg wrote:
> MJ> >
> MJ> > Connection tracking does not compile...
>
> MJ>
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 22:32 -0800, Udo A. Steinberg wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:13:55 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds (LT) wrote:
>
> LT> Ok, trying to calm things down again for a 2.6.11 release.
>
> Connection tracking does not compile...
>
> CC
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 22:32 -0800, Udo A. Steinberg wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:13:55 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds (LT) wrote:
LT Ok, trying to calm things down again for a 2.6.11 release.
Connection tracking does not compile...
CC net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.o
In
On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 12:57 -0800, Udo A. Steinberg wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:04:29 +0100 Martin Josefsson (MJ) wrote:
MJ On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 22:32 -0800, Udo A. Steinberg wrote:
MJ
MJ Connection tracking does not compile...
MJ The problem is when compiling without NAT...
MJ
On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 18:54 -0500, sean wrote:
I'm compiling with NAT, and get a different problem:
LD net/ipv4/netfilter/built-in.o
net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_nat_tftp.o(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of
`ip_nat_tftp_hook'
net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_tftp.o(.bss+0x0): first
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Michal Margula wrote:
> Hello!
>
> My friend told me to noticed you about problems I had with 2.4.x line of
> kernels. I started up from 2.4.3. Under heavy load I was getting
> messages from telnet, ping, nmap "No buffer space available". Strace
> told me it was error marked
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Michal Margula wrote:
Hello!
My friend told me to noticed you about problems I had with 2.4.x line of
kernels. I started up from 2.4.3. Under heavy load I was getting
messages from telnet, ping, nmap No buffer space available. Strace
told me it was error marked as
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Glenn Shannon wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Enjoying the -ac2 kernel except for one minor thing: it locks up.
As I see below you have a Realtek 8139B...
The 8139too driver in 2.4.3-something to 2.4.5-ac2 is broken. It will hang
your machine. so upgrade to 2.4.5-ac3 or above
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Glenn Shannon wrote:
Hi all!
Enjoying the -ac2 kernel except for one minor thing: it locks up.
As I see below you have a Realtek 8139B...
The 8139too driver in 2.4.3-something to 2.4.5-ac2 is broken. It will hang
your machine. so upgrade to 2.4.5-ac3 or above (2.4.5-ac9
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
[snip]
> Just got three of these suckers and I'm about to order a bunch
> more (happy camper)...
yes the Dlink DFE570-TX is a very nice card indeed.
[snip]
> Because the D-Link cards were less than half of the nearest
> competitor [ <
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
[snip]
Just got three of these suckers and I'm about to order a bunch
more (happy camper)...
yes the Dlink DFE570-TX is a very nice card indeed.
[snip]
Because the D-Link cards were less than half of the nearest
competitor [ $180
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Andris Pavenis wrote:
> On Sunday 27 May 2001 02:34, Alan Cox wrote:
[snip]
> > Can you try 2.4.5 with the 8139too.c file from the 2.4.3-ac3 that works for
> > you and report on that
>
> Done.
>
> Seems that taking 8139too.o from 2.4.3-ac3 fixes the problem.
>
>
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Andris Pavenis wrote:
On Sunday 27 May 2001 02:34, Alan Cox wrote:
[snip]
Can you try 2.4.5 with the 8139too.c file from the 2.4.3-ac3 that works for
you and report on that
Done.
Seems that taking 8139too.o from 2.4.3-ac3 fixes the problem.
Tortured it much
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Ted Gervais wrote:
>
> I get the following when ftping from one workstation to another.
> Using kernel 2.4.3 and Redhat7.1:
>
> Assertion failed! tp->tx_info[entry].skb ==
>NULL,8139too.c,rtl8139_start_xmit,line=1676
> Assertion failed! tp->tx_info[entry].mapping ==
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Ted Gervais wrote:
I get the following when ftping from one workstation to another.
Using kernel 2.4.3 and Redhat7.1:
Assertion failed! tp-tx_info[entry].skb ==
NULL,8139too.c,rtl8139_start_xmit,line=1676
Assertion failed! tp-tx_info[entry].mapping ==
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Wolfgang Rohdewald wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 April 2001 22:36, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
> > + if (len == -1 || len > 0 && len < count) {
>
> are you sure there are no missing () ?
>
> if ((len == -1) || (len > 0) && (len < count)) {
>
> assumig that && has precedence over ||
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
[snip]
> > Does arpfilter exist in 2.4 kernels?
>
> Not yet, will be merged very soon. I can send you a patch if you need it urgently.
No I don't need it urgently.
I was asking because I had this problem before (router with two cards
against one physical
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 03:26:19PM -0600, Eric Weigle wrote:
> > Hello-
> >
> > This is a known 'feature' of the Linux kernel, and can help with load sharing
> > and fault tolerance. However, it can also cause problems (such as when one nic
> > in a
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 03:26:19PM -0600, Eric Weigle wrote:
Hello-
This is a known 'feature' of the Linux kernel, and can help with load sharing
and fault tolerance. However, it can also cause problems (such as when one nic
in a multi-nic
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
[snip]
Does arpfilter exist in 2.4 kernels?
Not yet, will be merged very soon. I can send you a patch if you need it urgently.
No I don't need it urgently.
I was asking because I had this problem before (router with two cards
against one physical
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Wolfgang Rohdewald wrote:
On Tuesday 17 April 2001 22:36, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
+ if (len == -1 || len 0 len count) {
are you sure there are no missing () ?
if ((len == -1) || (len 0) (len count)) {
assumig that has precedence over || (I believe so)
I
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
>
> Intermediate diffs are available from
>
> http://www.bzimage.org
>
> (Note that the cmsfs port to 2.4 is a work in progress)
>
> 2.4.2-ac24
> o
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
Intermediate diffs are available from
http://www.bzimage.org
(Note that the cmsfs port to 2.4 is a work in progress)
2.4.2-ac24
o Fix build
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Alex Baretta wrote:
> Leandro Bernsmuller wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > some body know if exist or is possible to do one
> > driver
> > to makes floppy drive use some type of "balanced" bits
> > distribution?
> > ...
>
> I don't remember where I saw it, but I'm sure there is
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Alex Baretta wrote:
Leandro Bernsmuller wrote:
Hi,
some body know if exist or is possible to do one
driver
to makes floppy drive use some type of "balanced" bits
distribution?
...
I don't remember where I saw it, but I'm sure there is a program
which
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Mårten Wikström wrote:
[much text]
> Thanks! I'll try that out. How can I tell if the driver supports
> CONFIG_NET_HW_FLOWCONTROL? I'm not sure, but I think the cards are
> tulip-based, can I then use Robert & Jamal's optimised drivers?
> It'll probably take some time
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, [ISO-8859-1] Mårten Wikström wrote:
>
> > I've performed a test on the routing capacity of a Linux 2.4.2 box
> > versus a FreeBSD 4.2 box. I used two Pentium Pro 200Mhz computers with
> > 64Mb memory, and two DEC 100Mbit ethernet
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, [ISO-8859-1] Mrten Wikstrm wrote:
I've performed a test on the routing capacity of a Linux 2.4.2 box
versus a FreeBSD 4.2 box. I used two Pentium Pro 200Mhz computers with
64Mb memory, and two DEC 100Mbit ethernet cards. I
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Mrten Wikstrm wrote:
[much text]
Thanks! I'll try that out. How can I tell if the driver supports
CONFIG_NET_HW_FLOWCONTROL? I'm not sure, but I think the cards are
tulip-based, can I then use Robert Jamal's optimised drivers?
It'll probably take some time before I can
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Avi Green wrote:
>
> Dear folks,
>
> I apologize for bothering you, but if by any chance this is an easy
> question for you to answer (wishful thinking, huh?) I'd be very grateful
> if you would.*
>
> I have some new Hawk PCs (Pentium-III) with D-Link DFE-570TX Fast
>
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Avi Green wrote:
Dear folks,
I apologize for bothering you, but if by any chance this is an easy
question for you to answer (wishful thinking, huh?) I'd be very grateful
if you would.*
I have some new Hawk PCs (Pentium-III) with D-Link DFE-570TX Fast
Ethernet
Hi
I found out that there has been a namechange in serial.h and here's the
corresponding changes to serial.c.
--- linux-2.4.2-ac16.backup/drivers/char/serial.c Fri Mar 9 16:39:16 2001
+++ linux-2.4.2-ac16/drivers/char/serial.c Fri Mar 9 19:57:52 2001
@@ -5494,7 +5494,7 @@
Hi
I found out that there has been a namechange in serial.h and here's the
corresponding changes to serial.c.
--- linux-2.4.2-ac16.backup/drivers/char/serial.c Fri Mar 9 16:39:16 2001
+++ linux-2.4.2-ac16/drivers/char/serial.c Fri Mar 9 19:57:52 2001
@@ -5494,7 +5494,7 @@
Here's the Changelog that can be found at
ftp.*.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/testing/ChangeLog
I think Linus forgot to send it.
-pre1:
- Chris Mason: reiserfs, another null bytes bug
- Andrea Arkangeli: make SMP Athlon build
- Alexander Zarochentcev: reiserfs directory fsync SMP locking
Here's the Changelog that can be found at
ftp.*.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/testing/ChangeLog
I think Linus forgot to send it.
-pre1:
- Chris Mason: reiserfs, another null bytes bug
- Andrea Arkangeli: make SMP Athlon build
- Alexander Zarochentcev: reiserfs directory fsync SMP locking
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Ville Herva wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 01:54:46AM -0800, you [Colonel] claimed:
> >
> > >mount -o loop=/dev/loop1 net.i /var/mnt/image/
> >
> > ends up in an uninterruptable sleep state (system cannot umount /
> > during shutdown).
> >
> > How do I track this down?
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Martin Josefsson wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I saw your patch for the APIC lockup and I saw that it was included in
> > 2.4.1-ac2 so I tried that one.. but it didn't help..
> >
> > I can begin with describi
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote:
Martin Josefsson wrote:
Hi
I saw your patch for the APIC lockup and I saw that it was included in
2.4.1-ac2 so I tried that one.. but it didn't help..
I can begin with describing my machine:
dual pIII 800 (133MHz FSB)
Asus P3C-D
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Martin Josefsson wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I saw your patch for the APIC lockup and I saw that it was included in
> > 2.4.1-ac2 so I tried that one.. but it didn't help..
> >
> > I can begin with describi
Hi
I saw your patch for the APIC lockup and I saw that it was included in
2.4.1-ac2 so I tried that one.. but it didn't help..
I can begin with describing my machine:
dual pIII 800 (133MHz FSB)
Asus P3C-D mainboard with i820 chipset
256MB rimm (rambus)
Dlink DFE570TX (4 port tulip card)
Hi
I saw your patch for the APIC lockup and I saw that it was included in
2.4.1-ac2 so I tried that one.. but it didn't help..
I can begin with describing my machine:
dual pIII 800 (133MHz FSB)
Asus P3C-D mainboard with i820 chipset
256MB rimm (rambus)
Dlink DFE570TX (4 port tulip card)
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote:
Martin Josefsson wrote:
Hi
I saw your patch for the APIC lockup and I saw that it was included in
2.4.1-ac2 so I tried that one.. but it didn't help..
I can begin with describing my machine:
dual pIII 800 (133MHz FSB)
Asus P3C-D
On 24 Jan 2001, Mark Longair wrote:
> Mark Longair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [..]
> > I'm having a problem where twice a day or so, any new tcp connection
> > it gets stuck in SYN_SENT. Eventually this situation rights itself,
> > but obviously in the meantime many services (e.g. squid, X)
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Tim Sullivan wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Yes, that code is still necessary. There's a new aic7xxx driver by Justin
> > Gibbs at Adaptec which is now being beta tested which corrects this issue.
>
> Justin's 6.0.9beta(latest release) hasn't corrected the
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Tim Sullivan wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, that code is still necessary. There's a new aic7xxx driver by Justin
Gibbs at Adaptec which is now being beta tested which corrects this issue.
Justin's 6.0.9beta(latest release) hasn't corrected the problem yet.
On 24 Jan 2001, Mark Longair wrote:
Mark Longair [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[..]
I'm having a problem where twice a day or so, any new tcp connection
it gets stuck in SYN_SENT. Eventually this situation rights itself,
but obviously in the meantime many services (e.g. squid, X) are
On 23 Jan 2001, Daniel Stone wrote:
[snip]
> > -:- DCC GET request from aaronl_[[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [64.81.36.147:33989]] 150 bytes /* That's the NAT box's IP */
> > -:- DCC Unable to create connection: Connection refused
> >
> > Any idea what's wrong? I have irc-conntrack-nat
On 23 Jan 2001, Daniel Stone wrote:
[snip]
-:- DCC GET request from aaronl_[[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[64.81.36.147:33989]] 150 bytes /* That's the NAT box's IP */
-:- DCC Unable to create connection: Connection refused
Any idea what's wrong? I have irc-conntrack-nat compiled into
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Stephen Torri wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Martin Josefsson wrote:
>
> > My setup looks like this, I boot from hde
> > I configured my BIOS to boot from SCSI (I have no scsi-adapter but t
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Stephen Torri wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'm having difficulty booting from the Promise controller. Here is the
> story:
>
> I originally had my system setup with all drives working off the
> mainsboard IDE controller (Intel 82371AB
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Stephen Torri wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm having difficulty booting from the Promise controller. Here is the
story:
I originally had my system setup with all drives working off the
mainsboard IDE controller (Intel 82371AB PIIX4). The
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Stephen Torri wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Martin Josefsson wrote:
My setup looks like this, I boot from hde
I configured my BIOS to boot from SCSI (I have no scsi-adapter but the
promise card reports itself as one
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Tim Sailer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:07:18PM +0100, Erik Mouw wrote:
> > I had similar problems two weeks ago. Turned out the connection between
> > two switches: one of them was hard wired to 100Mbit/s full duplex, the
> > other one to 100Mbit/s half duplex. Just
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Tim Sailer wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:07:18PM +0100, Erik Mouw wrote:
I had similar problems two weeks ago. Turned out the connection between
two switches: one of them was hard wired to 100Mbit/s full duplex, the
other one to 100Mbit/s half duplex. Just to rule
hackers are funny people: They count the time in patchlevels.
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Martin Josefsson wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Martin Josefsson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > > > I compiled test13-pre3 a few minutes ago and when runnin
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Martin Josefsson wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > I compiled test13-pre3 a few minutes ago and when running
> > > make modules_install I got this:
> > >
> > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
>/lib/mo
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I compiled test13-pre3 a few minutes ago and when running
> > make modules_install I got this:
> >
> > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
>/lib/modules/2.4.0-test13-pre3/kernel/fs/ext2/ext2.o
> > depmod: buffer_insert_inode_queue
> > depmod:
Hi
I compiled test13-pre3 a few minutes ago and when running
make modules_install I got this:
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.0-test13-pre3/kernel/fs/ext2/ext2.o
depmod: buffer_insert_inode_queue
depmod: fsync_inode_buffers
As you may have noticed I have ext2
Hi
I compiled test13-pre3 a few minutes ago and when running
make modules_install I got this:
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.0-test13-pre3/kernel/fs/ext2/ext2.o
depmod: buffer_insert_inode_queue
depmod: fsync_inode_buffers
As you may have noticed I have ext2
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
I compiled test13-pre3 a few minutes ago and when running
make modules_install I got this:
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.0-test13-pre3/kernel/fs/ext2/ext2.o
depmod: buffer_insert_inode_queue
depmod:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Martin Josefsson wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
I compiled test13-pre3 a few minutes ago and when running
make modules_install I got this:
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.0-test13-pre3/kernel/fs/ext2/ext2.o
depmod
hackers are funny people: They count the time in patchlevels.
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Martin Josefsson wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Martin Josefsson wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
I compiled test13-pre3 a few minutes ago and when running
make modules_install I got
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Taco IJsselmuiden wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Martin Josefsson wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Taco IJsselmuiden wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm having trouble masquerading ftp-ports other than 20/21.
> > >
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Taco IJsselmuiden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having trouble masquerading ftp-ports other than 20/21.
> For some service i'm using, i need to masquerade port 42,43,62,63 for FTP
> (I know it's weird...).
> Now, when using 2.2.x kernels i could use
> 'insmod ip_masq_ftp
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Taco IJsselmuiden wrote:
Hi,
I'm having trouble masquerading ftp-ports other than 20/21.
For some service i'm using, i need to masquerade port 42,43,62,63 for FTP
(I know it's weird...).
Now, when using 2.2.x kernels i could use
'insmod ip_masq_ftp
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Taco IJsselmuiden wrote:
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Martin Josefsson wrote:
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Taco IJsselmuiden wrote:
Hi,
I'm having trouble masquerading ftp-ports other than 20/21.
For some service i'm using, i need to masquerade port 42,43,62,63 for FTP
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Adam wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> > > [adam@pepsi /tmp]$ dd if=/dev/zero of=holed.file bs=1000 seek=5000 count=1000
> > > [adam@pepsi /tmp]$ ls -l holed.file
> > > -rw-rw-r--1 adam adam 600 Nov 29 08:52 holed.file
> > >
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Adam wrote:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
[adam@pepsi /tmp]$ dd if=/dev/zero of=holed.file bs=1000 seek=5000 count=1000
[adam@pepsi /tmp]$ ls -l holed.file
-rw-rw-r--1 adam adam 600 Nov 29 08:52 holed.file
[adam@pepsi
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Anil kumar wrote:
> > The system hangs after messages:
> > loading linux..
> > uncompressing linux, booting linux kernel OK.
> >
> > The System hangs here.
> >
> > Please let me know where I am wrong
>
> Hi Anil,
>
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Anil kumar wrote:
The system hangs after messages:
loading linux..
uncompressing linux, booting linux kernel OK.
The System hangs here.
Please let me know where I am wrong
Hi Anil,
The only
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> > In page_launder() about halfway down there is this sequence of tests
> > on LRU pages:
> >
> > if (!clearedbuf) {
> > ...
> > } else if (!page->mapping) {
> > ...
> > } else if (page_count(page) > 1)
90 matches
Mail list logo
