IX_FS=y
CONFIG_PROC_FS=y
CONFIG_DEVPTS_FS=y
CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y
CONFIG_MSDOS_PARTITION=y
CONFIG_NLS=y
CONFIG_NLS_DEFAULT="iso8859-1"
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_437=y
CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_1=y
CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE=y
CONFIG_VIDEO_SELECT=y
CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
--
Mircea Damian
E-mails: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMA
no
coma_bug: yes
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr cx8 pge cmov mmx cyrix_arr
bogomips: 331.77
--
Mircea Damian
E-mails: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WebPage: http://taz.mania.k.ro/~dmircea/
=m
> CONFIG_PSMOUSE=y
>
> CONFIG_JOYSTICK=y
> CONFIG_INPUT_NS558=m
> CONFIG_INPUT_ANALOG=m
>
> CONFIG_NVRAM=m
> CONFIG_RTC=m
>
> CONFIG_AUTOFS4_FS=m
> CONFIG_REISERFS_FS=y
> CONFIG_FAT_FS=m
> CONFIG_MSDOS_FS=m
> CONFIG_VFAT_FS=m
> CONFIG_TMPFS=y
> CONF
rrupt handler!
If you need any other info please see my previous post:
http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0106.2/0790.html
(about the same problem and the OOPS is almost the same)
or just drop me an e-mail.
Please advise!
--
Mircea Damian
E-mails: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
Hi,
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
I can not start 2.4.6-pre5 on my machine.
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
I've tried to upgrade from 2.4.5-pre1 to 2.4.6-pre5 but it failed the new
kernel failed to boot. It OOPS-es while it's starting. I managed to write
down some of th
removed even though there are no more loop mounts.
"
So he has no loop mounts and he can not remove the module. This is a bug!
--
Mircea Damian
E-mails: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WebPage: http://taz.mania.k.ro/~dmircea/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri
this patch but at least it works.
Maybe someone can see which is the real bug and fix it.
Please help!
--
Mircea Damian
E-mails: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WebPage: http://taz.mania.k.ro/~dmircea/
/*
* linux/kernel/timer.c
*
* Kernel internal timers, kernel timekeeping, basic proc
; -- Lorenzo Marcantonio
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please rea
??
--
Mircea Damian
E-mails: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WebPage: http://taz.mania.k.ro/~dmircea/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
Hello,
I hope that this time it will be clear enough to extract some info. I got
the full OOPS and decoded it. Please find attached the decoded OOPS and
other info.
--
Mircea Damian
E-mails: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WebPage: http://taz.mania.k.ro/~dmircea/
[1.] One line summary
Resend. I got no answer.
--
Mircea Damian
E-mails: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WebPage: http://taz.mania.k.ro/~dmircea/
Hello,
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
Kernel OOPS. Machine hanged under heavy load.
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
The computer that
problem
(please look in /proc and include all information that you
think to be relevant):
This is a very loaded server running lots of apache processes and sendmail.
[X.] Other notes, patches, fixes, workarounds:
--
Mircea Damian
E-mails: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bellow for dmesg output for a better description of
hardware).
I do not see any corruption nor any messages in logs.
Should I use kdb or just remote logging would do the job?
--
Mircea Damian
E-mails: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WebPage: http://taz.mania.k.ro/~dmircea/
Linux version
-DJNA-371350, ATA DISK drive
Mar 2 20:26:29 taz kernel: hda: 26520480 sectors (13578 MB) w/1966KiB Cache,
CHS=1650/255/63
Is anybody able to explain the error?
That partition contains a valid VFAT partition with win98se installed on it (and it
works fine,
ofc if I remove lilo from MBR).
2.4.1? What's Linus opinion?
--
Mircea Damian
E-mails: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WebPage: http://taz.mania.k.ro/~dmircea/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
ut I thought I have a bus-mastering problem with
PCI cards so I replaced it.
--
Mircea Damian
E-mails: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WebPage: http://taz.mania.k.ro/~dmircea/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
not work.
--
Mircea Damian
E-mails: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WebPage: http://taz.mania.k.ro/~dmircea/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
AL. Right?
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 02:46:06PM +0200, Mircea Damian wrote:
>
> Sorry that I have to follow my self but I forgot to say that e2fsck is
> happy with it:
>
> root@invasion:~# e2fsck -C 0 -f /dev/hda2
> e2fsck 1.19, 13-Jul-2000 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
> Pass
:43 ../
root@invasion:/usr/src/perl-5.6.0/t# rm big
rm: cannot remove `big': Value too large for defined data type
I can not keep this machine down (my /-fs is read-only right now just to be
sure that nothing changes) for too much time.
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 02:24:33PM +0200, Mircea D
st just like the two above).
--
Mircea Damian
E-mails: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WebPage: http://taz.mania.k.ro/~dmircea/
uto BOOT_IMAGE=Linux ro root=302 console=ttyS0,38400
Initializing CPU#0
Detected 400.914 MHz processor.
Console: colour VGA+ 80x30
Calibrating delay loop... 799.54 BogoMI
Hello,
I just want to say that the file 'Documentation/networking/ppp.txt' (as it
is mentioned in Configure.help at CONFIG_PPP option) does not exists.
--
Mircea Damian
E-mails: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WebPage: http://taz.mania.k.ro/~dmircea/
-
To unsubscribe from
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:20:45AM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> Mircea Damian wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm unable to boot kernel 2.4.0-test10-pre5 on a:
>
> Upgrade GCC to 2.91.66 (aka egcs-1.1.2)
Ok. I can do that, but there is nowhere written that
c8 movl %ecx,%eax
405: c3 ret
406: 89 f6 movl %esi,%esi
It works fine with 2.2.14 too if that matters.
Thank you for your patience,
--
Mircea Damian
E-mails: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WebPage: http://taz
23 matches
Mail list logo