> -Original Message-
> From: Network Nut [mailto:sillyst...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 5:00 PM
> To: 'Clemens Ladisch'
> Cc: 'Austin S. Hemmelgarn'; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: WaitForMultipleObjects/etc. In Kernel
> > -Origin
> -Original Message-
> From: Clemens Ladisch [mailto:clem...@ladisch.de]
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 4:54 PM
> To: Network Nut
> Cc: 'Austin S. Hemmelgarn'; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: WaitForMultipleObjects/etc. In Kernel
>
> Network
> -Original Message-
> From: Austin S. Hemmelgarn [mailto:ahferro...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 11:05 AM
> To: Network Nut; 'Clemens Ladisch'
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: WaitForMultipleObjects/etc. In Kernel
> >> Network Nu
-Original Message-
From: Austin S. Hemmelgarn [mailto:ahferro...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 11:05 AM
To: Network Nut; 'Clemens Ladisch'
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WaitForMultipleObjects/etc. In Kernel
Network Nut wrote:
I was thinking
-Original Message-
From: Clemens Ladisch [mailto:clem...@ladisch.de]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 4:54 PM
To: Network Nut
Cc: 'Austin S. Hemmelgarn'; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WaitForMultipleObjects/etc. In Kernel
Network Nut wrote:
Assuming that you're
-Original Message-
From: Network Nut [mailto:sillyst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 5:00 PM
To: 'Clemens Ladisch'
Cc: 'Austin S. Hemmelgarn'; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: WaitForMultipleObjects/etc. In Kernel
-Original Message-
From: Clemens
> -Original Message-
> From: Clemens Ladisch [mailto:clem...@ladisch.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:31 AM
> To: Network Nut
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: WaitForMultipleObjects/etc. In Kernel
>
> Network Nut wrote:
> >I was look
-Original Message-
From: Clemens Ladisch [mailto:clem...@ladisch.de]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:31 AM
To: Network Nut
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: WaitForMultipleObjects/etc. In Kernel
Network Nut wrote:
I was looking at POSIX because it allows naming
> -Original Message-
> From: Clemens Ladisch [mailto:clem...@ladisch.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 3:04 AM
> To: Network Nut
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: WaitForMultipleObjects/etc. In Kernel
>
> Network Nut wrote:
> > 5. I ca
-Original Message-
From: Clemens Ladisch [mailto:clem...@ladisch.de]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 3:04 AM
To: Network Nut
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WaitForMultipleObjects/etc. In Kernel
Network Nut wrote:
5. I can simulate system-global named mutex using
> Unrelated processes cannot directly open objects created by another
> process (with the exception of sockets and pipes, which can be created in
> the file system). However, sharing of any file descriptor is possible by
> sending it in a control message through a Unix domain socket.
I just
Unrelated processes cannot directly open objects created by another
process (with the exception of sockets and pipes, which can be created in
the file system). However, sharing of any file descriptor is possible by
sending it in a control message through a Unix domain socket.
I just spent a
> -Original Message-
> From: Clemens Ladisch [mailto:clem...@ladisch.de]
> Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2014 12:33 PM
> To: Network Nut
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: WaitForMultipleObjects/etc. In Kernel
>
> Network Nut wrote:
> > I th
-Original Message-
From: Clemens Ladisch [mailto:clem...@ladisch.de]
Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2014 12:33 PM
To: Network Nut
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WaitForMultipleObjects/etc. In Kernel
Network Nut wrote:
I think that the facility by which a thread can
Hi All,
This is my first post to anything Linux, so if there is a better mailing
list, please let me know.
I think that the facility by which a thread can block while waiting for any
of several synchronization primitives (*mutex*, *semaphore*, *event*,
*waitable
timer*)...is not only "nice to
Hi All,
This is my first post to anything Linux, so if there is a better mailing
list, please let me know.
I think that the facility by which a thread can block while waiting for any
of several synchronization primitives (*mutex*, *semaphore*, *event*,
*waitable
timer*)...is not only nice to
16 matches
Mail list logo