Re: [PATCH] HID: i2c-hid: Prevent sending reports from racing with device reset

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > Below is what happens to touchpad on Lenovo Yoga 900 during resume from > system sleep: > Reported-by: Nish Aravamudan > Reported-by: Linus Torvalds > Suggested-by: Benjamin Tissoires > Signed-off-by: Mika Wes

Re: [PATCH] HID: i2c-hid: Prevent sending reports from racing with device reset

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Below is what happens to touchpad on Lenovo Yoga 900 during resume from > system sleep: > Reported-by: Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamu...@gmail.com> > Reported-by: Linus

Re: [RESEND] Lenovo Yoga 900 touchpad issues

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 04:42:09PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: >> On another occasion the faulty input report was received immediatelly >> after we call i2c_hid_set_power(). >> >> With below hack patch suspend/resume works fine but it is

Re: [RESEND] Lenovo Yoga 900 touchpad issues

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 04:42:09PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: >> On another occasion the faulty input report was received immediatelly >> after we call i2c_hid_set_power(). >> >> With below hack patch

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 18:33 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas >> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 17:08 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> >

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 17:08 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas >> wrote: >> > Hi Andy, >> > >> > As per Nish these patches are impacting s

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 17:07 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada >> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 15:38 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> > &g

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

re necessary for functioning. I don't know (I will test it now), if removing the series makes the IIO sensors work properly in /dev/. -Nish > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 16:51 -0800, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: >> On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 15:38 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> > [Starting a ne

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 15:38 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> [Starting a new thread from https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/663, as >> now my laptop is displaying values in the sysfs *raw* files.] >> >>

iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

[Starting a new thread from https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/663, as now my laptop is displaying values in the sysfs *raw* files.] So I'm trying to understand exactly how the hid-sensor-accel-3d driver works. If I turn up debugging, when I `cat /sys/bus/iio/devices/device*/*raw*`, I see "iio

Re: Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Crt Mori wrote: >> On 17 December 2015 at 19:10, Nish Aravamudan >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Nish Aravamudan >>> wrote: >>>> On T

Re: Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Crt Mori wrote: > On 17 December 2015 at 19:10, Nish Aravamudan > wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Nish Aravamudan >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Crt Mori wrote: >>>> On 17 December 2015

Re: Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Crt Mori wrote: >> On 17 December 2015 at 06:27, Nish Aravamudan >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Nish Aravamudan >>> wrote: >>>> On

Re: [RESEND] Lenovo Yoga 900 touchpad issues

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > On Dec 17 2015 or thereabouts, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> Hi Benjamin, >> >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:53 AM, Benjamin Tissoires >> wrote: >> > On Dec 16 2015 or thereabouts, Nish Aravamudan wrote: &g

Re: Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Crt Mori wrote: > On 17 December 2015 at 06:27, Nish Aravamudan > wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Nish Aravamudan >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Crt Mori wrote: >>>> >>>> On D

Re: [RESEND] Lenovo Yoga 900 touchpad issues

Hi Benjamin, On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:53 AM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > On Dec 16 2015 or thereabouts, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> Hi Jiri, >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: >> > On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Mika Westerberg wrote: >> > &g

Re: [RESEND] Lenovo Yoga 900 touchpad issues

Hi Benjamin, On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:53 AM, Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Dec 16 2015 or thereabouts, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> Hi Jiri, >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Jiri Kosina <ji...@kernel.org> wrote: >> >

Re: [RESEND] Lenovo Yoga 900 touchpad issues

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Dec 17 2015 or thereabouts, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> Hi Benjamin, >> >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:53 AM, Benjamin Tissoires >> <benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com> wr

Re: Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Crt Mori <c...@melexis.com> wrote: > On 17 December 2015 at 06:27, Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamu...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Nish Aravamudan >> <nish.aravamu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>

Re: Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Crt Mori <c...@melexis.com> wrote: >> On 17 December 2015 at 06:27, Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Wed

Re: Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Crt Mori <c...@melexis.com> wrote: > On 17 December 2015 at 19:10, Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamu...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Nish Aravamudan >> <nish.aravamu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>

Re: Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Crt Mori <c...@melexis.com> wrote: >> On 17 December 2015 at 19:10, Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Thu

iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

[Starting a new thread from https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/663, as now my laptop is displaying values in the sysfs *raw* files.] So I'm trying to understand exactly how the hid-sensor-accel-3d driver works. If I turn up debugging, when I `cat /sys/bus/iio/devices/device*/*raw*`, I see "iio

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas <srinivas.pandruv...@intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 18:33 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas >> <srinivas.pandruv...@intel.com> wrote: >> > On

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruv...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 17:07 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada >> <srinivas.pandruv...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >&

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas <srinivas.pandruv...@intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 17:08 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas >> <srinivas.pandruv...@intel.com> wrote: >>

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

oga 900 don't work at all. So they are necessary for functioning. I don't know (I will test it now), if removing the series makes the IIO sensors work properly in /dev/. -Nish > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 16:51 -0800, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: >> On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 15:38 -0800, Nish Arava

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruv...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 15:38 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> [Starting a new thread from https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/663, as >> now my laptop is displaying values in

Re: Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Crt Mori wrote: >> >> On Dec 16, 2015 11:37 PM, "Nish Aravamudan" >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:22 PM, C

Re: Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Crt Mori wrote: > > On Dec 16, 2015 11:37 PM, "Nish Aravamudan" > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Crt Mori wrote: >> > On 16 December 2015 at 22:41, Nish Aravamudan >> > wrote:

Re: [RESEND] Lenovo Yoga 900 touchpad issues

Hi Jiri, On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Mika Westerberg wrote: > >> > [Apologies for the resend, didn't realize I hadn't changed my GMail >> > settings >> > to not use HTML.] >> > >> > I have recently purchased a Lenovo Yoga 900 and most everything is

Re: [RESEND] Lenovo Yoga 900 touchpad issues

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:14:32AM -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> [Apologies for the resend, didn't realize I hadn't changed my GMail settings >> to not use HTML.] >> >> I have recently purchased a Lenovo Y

Re: Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

Hi, On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Crt Mori wrote: > On 16 December 2015 at 22:41, Nish Aravamudan > wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Daniel Baluta >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Nish Aravamudan >

Re: Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

Hi Daniel, On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Daniel Baluta wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Nish Aravamudan > wrote: >> So, I apologize in advance for this relatively vague report, but I'm fairly >> sure >> the Yoga 900 has an accelerometer amongst othe

Re: Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Crt Mori wrote: > Hi, > So you were using 4.4-rc5 before and it worked, but after applying a > patch it stopped? Sorry, I should have explained it better. Without the patchset referred to in my original e-mail, the touchpad simply doesn't work. However, I do have

Re: Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Crt Mori <c...@melexis.com> wrote: > > On Dec 16, 2015 11:37 PM, "Nish Aravamudan" <nish.aravamu...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Crt Mori <c...@melexis.com&

Re: [RESEND] Lenovo Yoga 900 touchpad issues

Hi Jiri, On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Mika Westerberg wrote: > >> > [Apologies for the resend, didn't realize I hadn't changed my GMail >> > settings >> > to not use HTML.] >> > >> > I have recently purchased a Lenovo Yoga 900 and

Re: Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Crt Mori wrote: > Hi, > So you were using 4.4-rc5 before and it worked, but after applying a > patch it stopped? Sorry, I should have explained it better. Without the patchset referred to in my original e-mail, the touchpad simply doesn't work.

Re: Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

Hi, On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Crt Mori <c...@melexis.com> wrote: > On 16 December 2015 at 22:41, Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamu...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Daniel Baluta <daniel.bal...@gmail.com> >

Re: Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

Hi Daniel, On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Daniel Baluta <daniel.bal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Nish Aravamudan > <nish.aravamu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> So, I apologize in advance for this relatively vague report, but I'm fairly >

Re: [RESEND] Lenovo Yoga 900 touchpad issues

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:14:32AM -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> [Apologies for the resend, didn't realize I hadn't changed my GMail settings >> to not use HTML.] >> >> I

Re: Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Crt Mori <c...@melexis.com> wrote: >> >> On Dec 16, 2015 11:37 PM, "Nish Aravamudan" <nish.aravamu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>

"special" key when Lenovo Yoga 900 in tablet mode

So the Lenovo Yoga 900 has 4 "modes" (laptop, tent, stand and tablet). In tablet mode, it appears that the following is printed roughly every second: atkbd serio0: Unknown key pressed (translated set 2, code 0xbf on isa0060/serio0). atkbd serio0: Use 'setkeycodes e03f ' to make it known.

[RESEND] Lenovo Yoga 900 touchpad issues

[Apologies for the resend, didn't realize I hadn't changed my GMail settings to not use HTML.] I have recently purchased a Lenovo Yoga 900 and most everything is working with a slightly modified 4.4-rc5 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/30/441 applied to enable the touchpad itself), I am seeing two

Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

So, I apologize in advance for this relatively vague report, but I'm fairly sure the Yoga 900 has an accelerometer amongst other sensors (ambient light?) exported over IIO. But, these sensors seem to not be updating at all with a 4.4-rc5+ kernel (a set of patches from

Issues with Lenovo Yoga 900 IIO devices (accelerometer, etc.)

So, I apologize in advance for this relatively vague report, but I'm fairly sure the Yoga 900 has an accelerometer amongst other sensors (ambient light?) exported over IIO. But, these sensors seem to not be updating at all with a 4.4-rc5+ kernel (a set of patches from

[RESEND] Lenovo Yoga 900 touchpad issues

[Apologies for the resend, didn't realize I hadn't changed my GMail settings to not use HTML.] I have recently purchased a Lenovo Yoga 900 and most everything is working with a slightly modified 4.4-rc5 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/30/441 applied to enable the touchpad itself), I am seeing two

"special" key when Lenovo Yoga 900 in tablet mode

So the Lenovo Yoga 900 has 4 "modes" (laptop, tent, stand and tablet). In tablet mode, it appears that the following is printed roughly every second: atkbd serio0: Unknown key pressed (translated set 2, code 0xbf on isa0060/serio0). atkbd serio0: Use 'setkeycodes e03f ' to make it known.

Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 - Build Failure at acpi_os

On 2/22/08, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:08:15 +0100 Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 05:38:52PM -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > > On 2/21/08, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > O

Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 - Build Failure at acpi_os

On 2/22/08, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 05:38:52PM -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > On 2/21/08, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:54:40AM -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > > &g

Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 - Build Failure at acpi_os

On 2/22/08, Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 05:38:52PM -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: On 2/21/08, Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:54:40AM -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: On 2/20/08, Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 - Build Failure at acpi_os

On 2/22/08, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:08:15 +0100 Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 05:38:52PM -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: On 2/21/08, Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:54:40AM -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote

Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 - Build Failure at acpi_os

On 2/21/08, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:54:40AM -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > On 2/20/08, Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Saturday 16 February 2008 14:47, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > > > > Hi

Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 - Build Failure at acpi_os

On 2/20/08, Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 16 February 2008 14:47, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > The 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 kernel with randconfig build option, fails > > to build on x86_64 machine > > > > CC drivers/acpi/osl.o > >

Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 - Build Failure at acpi_os

On 2/20/08, Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 16 February 2008 14:47, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: Hi Andrew, The 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 kernel with randconfig build option, fails to build on x86_64 machine CC drivers/acpi/osl.o drivers/acpi/osl.c:60:38: error: empty

Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 - Build Failure at acpi_os

On 2/21/08, Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:54:40AM -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: On 2/20/08, Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 16 February 2008 14:47, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: Hi Andrew, The 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 kernel

Re: 2.6.26-git0: IDE oops during boot

On 2/7/08, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 07 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > > >> On Wed 2008-02-06 11:53:34, Pavel Machek wrote: > > >>> Hi!

Re: 2.6.26-git0: IDE oops during boot

On 2/7/08, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 07 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: Hi, On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: On Wed 2008-02-06 11:53:34, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! Trying to boot

Re: missing asm-x86_64 detection

On 1/31/08, Reinaldo Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > :/# uname -a > Linux devil 2.6.22.16-amd64 #15 SMP Sat Jan 19 13:58:02 BRT 2008 > x86_64 GNU/Linux > > :/# cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.22 > :/# patch -p1 -R < ../patch-2.6.22.16 > :/# patch -p1 < ../patch-2.6.23 > :/# patch -p1 < ../patch-2.6.24

Re: missing asm-x86_64 detection

On 1/31/08, Reinaldo Carvalho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :/# uname -a Linux devil 2.6.22.16-amd64 #15 SMP Sat Jan 19 13:58:02 BRT 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux :/# cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.22 :/# patch -p1 -R ../patch-2.6.22.16 :/# patch -p1 ../patch-2.6.23 :/# patch -p1 ../patch-2.6.24 :/# cd

Re: [PATCH] Fake NUMA emulation for PowerPC (Take 2)

On 1/27/08, Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-27 22:55:43]: > > > Balbir Singh writes: > > > > > Here's a better and more complete fix for the problem. Could you > > > please see if it works for you? I tested it on a real NUMA box and it > > >

Re: [PATCH] Fake NUMA emulation for PowerPC (Take 2)

On 1/27/08, Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Paul Mackerras [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-27 22:55:43]: Balbir Singh writes: Here's a better and more complete fix for the problem. Could you please see if it works for you? I tested it on a real NUMA box and it seemed to work fine

Re: crash in kmem_cache_init

On 1/22/08, Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/slab-20080122/partial-revert-slab-changes.patch > > .. Can you please check on your machine if it fixes your problem? > > It does not fix or change the nature of the

Re: crash in kmem_cache_init

On 1/22/08, Olaf Hering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, Mel Gorman wrote: http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/slab-20080122/partial-revert-slab-changes.patch .. Can you please check on your machine if it fixes your problem? It does not fix or change the nature of the crash.

Re: crash in kmem_cache_init

On 1/18/08, Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could you try this patch? > > Memoryless nodes: Set N_NORMAL_MEMORY for a node if we do not support > HIGHMEM > > It seems that we only scan through zones to set N_NORMAL_MEMORY only if > CONFIG_HIGHMEM and CONFIG_NUMA are set. We need to

Re: crash in kmem_cache_init

On 1/18/08, Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you try this patch? Memoryless nodes: Set N_NORMAL_MEMORY for a node if we do not support HIGHMEM It seems that we only scan through zones to set N_NORMAL_MEMORY only if CONFIG_HIGHMEM and CONFIG_NUMA are set. We need to set

Re: [PATCH] [6/8] GBPAGES: Add an option to disable direct mapping gbpages and a global variable

On 1/3/08, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Index: linux/Documentation/x86_64/boot-options.txt > === > --- linux.orig/Documentation/x86_64/boot-options.txt > +++

Re: [2.6 patch] hwmon/ibmpex.c: fix NULL dereference

On 10/17/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't dereference "data" when we know for sure it's NULL. > > Spotted by the Coverity checker. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > 66bec2ef5c6d55fc30ef6ac5bb97fdfcfaf394f2 > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c

Re: [2.6 patch] hwmon/ibmpex.c: fix NULL dereference

On 10/17/07, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't dereference data when we know for sure it's NULL. Spotted by the Coverity checker. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- 66bec2ef5c6d55fc30ef6ac5bb97fdfcfaf394f2 diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c b/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c

Re: atm: panic when loading clip 2nd time

On 10/16/07, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2.6.23-git7, using SLAB (not SLUB) [config attached]: > > # modprobe clip > # rmmod clip > # modprobe clip > > results in panic: > > kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache clip_arp_cache > > Call Trace: > [] kmem_cache_create+0x3bf/0x3fd > []

Re: atm: panic when loading clip 2nd time

On 10/16/07, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2.6.23-git7, using SLAB (not SLUB) [config attached]: # modprobe clip # rmmod clip # modprobe clip results in panic: kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache clip_arp_cache Call Trace: [8028c682] kmem_cache_create+0x3bf/0x3fd

Re: 2.6.23-rc7-mm1 -- powerpc rtas panic

On 10/5/07, Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 05:01:47PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > On 10/2/07, Tony Breeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:30:16AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > > &

Re: 2.6.23-rc7-mm1 -- powerpc rtas panic

On 10/5/07, Linas Vepstas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 05:01:47PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote: On 10/2/07, Tony Breeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:30:16AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: I realise it'll make the patch bigger

Re: 2.6.23-rc7-mm1 -- powerpc rtas panic

On 10/2/07, Tony Breeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:30:16AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > I realise it'll make the patch bigger, but this doesn't seem like a > > particularly good name for the variable anymore. > > Sure, what about? > > Clarify when RTAS logging

Re: 2.6.23-rc7-mm1 -- powerpc rtas panic

On 10/2/07, Tony Breeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:30:16AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: I realise it'll make the patch bigger, but this doesn't seem like a particularly good name for the variable anymore. Sure, what about? Clarify when RTAS logging is enabled.

Re: x86 patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24

On 10/2/07, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 00:18:09 -0700 > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > How come? Memoryless node can and do occur in real-world machines. > > > > Kernel > > > > should support that? > > > > > > But a node is just

Re: x86 patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24

On 10/2/07, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 00:18:09 -0700 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How come? Memoryless node can and do occur in real-world machines. Kernel should support that? But a node is just defined by its memory?

Re: Make checkpatch warn about pointless casting of kalloc returns.

On 8/8/07, jschopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +WARN("No need to cast return value.\n"); > > > > > > Could the warning be more descriptive? This describes what, but it > > should also describe > > > why; after all if somebody made this error they may not know

Re: Make checkpatch warn about pointless casting of kalloc returns.

On 8/8/07, jschopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +WARN(No need to cast return value.\n); Could the warning be more descriptive? This describes what, but it should also describe why; after all if somebody made this error they may not know they why. I'm

Re: [PATCH] Add missing newlines to some uses of dev_ messages

On 8/7/07, Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Found these while looking at printk uses. > > Add missing newlines to dev_ uses > Add missing KERN_ prefixes to multiline dev_s > Fixed a wierd->weird spelling typo > Added a newline to a printk I think these should have been split logically

Re: [PATCH] Add missing newlines to some uses of dev_level messages

On 8/7/07, Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Found these while looking at printk uses. Add missing newlines to dev_level uses Add missing KERN_level prefixes to multiline dev_levels Fixed a wierd-weird spelling typo Added a newline to a printk I think these should have been split

Re: [PATCH] remove hugetlb_instantiation_mutex

On 8/3/07, Adam Litke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 15:15 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 11:37 -0500, Adam Litke wrote: > > > Hey... I am amazed at how quickly you came back with a patch for this :) > > > Thanks for looking at it. Unfortunately there is

Re: [PATCH] remove hugetlb_instantiation_mutex

On 8/3/07, Adam Litke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 15:15 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 11:37 -0500, Adam Litke wrote: Hey... I am amazed at how quickly you came back with a patch for this :) Thanks for looking at it. Unfortunately there is one

Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 huge pages VM freeze (maybe?)

On 8/1/07, Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 08:52 -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > On 7/31/07, Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 15:02 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:21

Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 huge pages VM freeze (maybe?)

On 8/1/07, Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 08:52 -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote: On 7/31/07, Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 15:02 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:21 -0600 Zan Lynx wrote: I was playing with huge

Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 huge pages VM freeze (maybe?)

On 7/31/07, Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 15:02 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:21 -0600 Zan Lynx wrote: > > > > > I was playing with huge pages and libhugetlbfs. Small programs like > > > "ls" work fine. I tried running Evolution through

Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 huge pages VM freeze (maybe?)

On 7/31/07, Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 15:02 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:21 -0600 Zan Lynx wrote: > > > > > I was playing with huge pages and libhugetlbfs. Small programs like > > > "ls" work fine. I tried running Evolution through

Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 huge pages VM freeze (maybe?)

On 8/1/07, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > On 7/31/07, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:21 -0600 Zan Lynx wrote: > >> > >>> I was playing with huge pages and libhugetlbfs.

Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 huge pages VM freeze (maybe?)

On 7/31/07, Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 15:02 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:21 -0600 Zan Lynx wrote: > > > > > I was playing with huge pages and libhugetlbfs. Small programs like > > > "ls" work fine. I tried running Evolution through

Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 huge pages VM freeze (maybe?)

On 7/31/07, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:21 -0600 Zan Lynx wrote: > > > I was playing with huge pages and libhugetlbfs. Small programs like > > "ls" work fine. I tried running Evolution through libhugetlbfs and the > > system slowly stops running. One

Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 huge pages VM freeze (maybe?)

On 7/31/07, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:21 -0600 Zan Lynx wrote: I was playing with huge pages and libhugetlbfs. Small programs like ls work fine. I tried running Evolution through libhugetlbfs and the system slowly stops running. One interesting

Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 huge pages VM freeze (maybe?)

On 8/1/07, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nish Aravamudan wrote: On 7/31/07, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:21 -0600 Zan Lynx wrote: I was playing with huge pages and libhugetlbfs. Small programs like ls work fine. I tried running Evolution

Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 huge pages VM freeze (maybe?)

On 7/31/07, Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 15:02 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:21 -0600 Zan Lynx wrote: I was playing with huge pages and libhugetlbfs. Small programs like ls work fine. I tried running Evolution through libhugetlbfs and

Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 huge pages VM freeze (maybe?)

On 7/31/07, Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 15:02 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:21 -0600 Zan Lynx wrote: I was playing with huge pages and libhugetlbfs. Small programs like ls work fine. I tried running Evolution through libhugetlbfs and

Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 huge pages VM freeze (maybe?)

On 7/31/07, Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 15:02 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:21 -0600 Zan Lynx wrote: I was playing with huge pages and libhugetlbfs. Small programs like ls work fine. I tried running Evolution through libhugetlbfs and

Re: [PATCH/RFC] msleep() with hrtimers

On 7/16/07, Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nish Aravamudan wrote: > Well, before these changes, the only guarantee msleep() could make, > just like the only guarantee schedule_timeout() could make, was that > it would not return early. The 1-jiffy sleep was alway

Re: [PATCH/RFC] msleep() with hrtimers

On 7/16/07, Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nish Aravamudan wrote: Well, before these changes, the only guarantee msleep() could make, just like the only guarantee schedule_timeout() could make, was that it would not return early. The 1-jiffy sleep was always tough to deal

Re: [PATCH/RFC] msleep() with hrtimers

On 7/16/07, Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/16/07, Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > > One possible problem here is that setting up that timer can be > > > considerably more expensive, for a relative timer you have to read the > > >

Re: [PATCH/RFC] msleep() with hrtimers

On 7/16/07, Ray Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/16/07, Roman Zippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Jonathan Corbet wrote: One possible problem here is that setting up that timer can be considerably more expensive, for a relative timer you have to read the current time,

Re: [PATCH] Add nid sanity on alloc_pages_node

On 7/14/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:40:25 -0700 "Nish Aravamudan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/13/07, Joe Jin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Patch gone too ;) I deleted it. I was hoping th

  1   2   3   4   >