Re: [kees:devel/overflow/sanitizers] [overflow] 660787b56e: UBSAN:signed-integer-overflow_in_lib/test_memcat_p.c

hi, Kees, On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 04:23:06PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 10:52:56PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > ... > > while testing, we observed below different (and same part) between parent > > and > > this commit: > > > > ea804316c9db5148

Re: [selftests] e48d82b67a: BUG_TestSlub_RZ_alloc(Not_tainted):Redzone_overwritten

Hi Vlastimil, On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 12:29:40PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 3/17/21 9:36 AM, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > > > Greeting, > > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9): > > > > commit: e48d82b67a2b760eedf7b95ca15f41267496386c ("[PATCH 1/2]

Re: [mm] 8fd8d23ab1: WARNING:at_fs/buffer.c:#__brelse

Hi Minchan, On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 09:29:38AM -0700, Minchan Kim wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:37:57AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > > > Greeting, > > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9): > > > > commit: 8fd8d23ab10cc2fceeac25ea7b0e2eaf98e78d64

Re: [vdpa_sim_net] 79991caf52: net/ipv4/ipmr.c:#RCU-list_traversed_in_non-reader_section

xf5/0x160 > >> [ 890.653833] ? vfs_iter_read+0x80/0x80 > >> [ 890.664229] ? __fdget_pos+0xc0/0xe0 > >> [ 890.674236] ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0xd9/0x1a0 > >> [ 890.684259] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x14/0x40 > >> [ 890.693852] ? sched_clock+0x1b/0x40 > >> [ 890.702898] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x120 > >> [ 890.711648] ? write_comp_data+0x2a/0xa0 > >> [ 890.720243] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x1d/0x60 > >> [ 890.729290] do_readv+0x111/0x260 > >> [ 890.738205] ? vfs_readv+0x160/0x160 > >> [ 890.747154] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x77/0x100 > >> [ 890.756100] ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x8a/0x100 > >> [ 890.765126] do_syscall_64+0x34/0x80 > >> [ 890.773795] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 > >> [ 890.782630] RIP: 0033:0x453b29 > >> [ 890.791189] Code: 00 f3 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 > >> 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 > >> <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 3b 84 00 00 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 > >> [ 890.810866] RSP: 002b:7ffcda44fb18 EFLAGS: 0246 ORIG_RAX: > >> 0013 > >> [ 890.820764] RAX: ffda RBX: 0013 RCX: > >> 00453b29 > >> [ 890.830792] RDX: 009a RSI: 01de1c00 RDI: > >> 00b9 > >> [ 890.840626] RBP: 7ffcda44fbc0 R08: 722c279d69ffc468 R09: > >> 0400 > >> [ 890.850366] R10: 0098d82a42c63c22 R11: 0246 R12: > >> 0002 > >> [ 890.860001] R13: 7f042ae6f058 R14: 010a2830 R15: > >> 7f042ae6f000 > >> > >> > >> > >> To reproduce: > >> > >> # build kernel > >>cd linux > >>cp config-5.11.0-rc4-8-g79991caf5202 .config > >>make HOSTCC=gcc-9 CC=gcc-9 ARCH=x86_64 olddefconfig prepare > >> modules_prepare bzImage > >> > >> git clone > >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!LfgrgVVtPAjwjqTZX8yANgsix4f3cJmAA_CcMeCVymh5XYcamWdR9dnbIQA-Qkr9TyI$ > >> > >> cd lkp-tests > >> bin/lkp qemu -k job-script # job-script is attached in > >> this email > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Oliver Sang > >> >

Re: [btrfs] 5297199a8b: xfstests.btrfs.220.fail

Hi Nikolay, On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:36:52AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 9.03.21 г. 10:49 ч., kernel test robot wrote: > > > > > > Greeting, > > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9): > > > > commit: 5297199a8bca12b8b96afcbf2341605efb6005de ("btrfs: remove

Re: [mm/highmem] 61b205f579: WARNING:at_mm/highmem.c:#__kmap_local_sched_out

Hi Ira, On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 08:02:20AM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 08:53:04PM +, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > > Ira, > > > > On 3/4/21 00:23, kernel test robot wrote: > > > Greeting, > > > > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9): > > > > > >

Re: [tcp] 9d9b1ee0b2: packetdrill.packetdrill/gtests/net/tcp/user_timeout/user-timeout-probe_ipv4-mapped-v6.fail

Hi, Neal, On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 10:13:02PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote: > Hi, Neal, > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 09:52:04AM -0500, Neal Cardwell wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 8:33 PM kernel test robot > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Greeting,

Re: [tcp] 9d9b1ee0b2: packetdrill.packetdrill/gtests/net/tcp/user_timeout/user-timeout-probe_ipv4-mapped-v6.fail

Hi, Neal, On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 09:52:04AM -0500, Neal Cardwell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 8:33 PM kernel test robot > wrote: > > > > > > Greeting, > > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9): > > > > commit: 9d9b1ee0b2d1c9e02b2338c4a4b0a062d2d3edac ("tcp: fix > >

Re: [binfmt_elf] d97e11e25d: ltp.DS000.fail

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 09:03:26AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 6:35 AM kernel test robot > wrote: > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9): > > > > commit: d97e11e25dd226c44257284f95494bb06d1ebf5a ("[PATCH v2] binfmt_elf: > > Fix

Re: [workqueue] d5bff968ea: WARNING:at_kernel/workqueue.c:#process_one_work

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:24:32PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:45:11 +0800 > > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9): > > > > commit: d5bff968ea9cc005e632d9369c26cbd8148c93d5 ("workqueue: break > > affinity initiatively") > >

Re: [workqueue] d5bff968ea: WARNING:at_kernel/workqueue.c:#process_one_work

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:42:48PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:45:11 +0800 > > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9): > > > > commit: d5bff968ea9cc005e632d9369c26cbd8148c93d5 ("workqueue: break > > affinity initiatively") > >

Re: [proc/wchan] 30a3a19273: leaking-addresses.proc.wchan./proc/bus/input/devices:B:KEY=1000000000007ff980000000007fffebeffdfffeffffffffffffffffffffe

t; [2 .noinstr.text] 0xc04b8d00 > > [1 uevent] KEY=10007 ff9807ff febeffdfffef > > fffe > > [50 modules] netconsole 20480 0 - Live 0xc00cb000 > > [337 blacklist] 0x81c00880-0x81c008a0 asm_exc_overflow > > [1 .rodata.cst32.byteshift_table] 0xc00a7100 > > [2 wchan] 0xc93c/proc/bus/input/devices: B: KEY=10007 > > ff9807ff febeffdfffef fffe > > [6 .ref.data] 0xc02817a0 > > [14 __ksymtab_gpl] 0xc03b503c > > [42 .rodata] 0xc009f2c0 > > [50 .symtab] 0xc00b9000 > > > > > > > > To reproduce: > > > > git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git > > cd lkp-tests > > bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email > > bin/lkp run job.yaml > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > Oliver Sang > > >

Re: [iov_iter] 9bd0e337c6: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -4.8% regression

Hi David, On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 11:51:48AM +, David Howells wrote: > kernel test robot wrote: > > > FYI, we noticed a -4.8% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to > > commit: > > > > > > commit: 9bd0e337c633aed3e8ec3c7397b7ae0b8436f163 ("[PATCH 01/29] iov_iter: > > Switch

Re: [drm/fb] 1d46491d4a: WARNING:at_drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c:#drm_fb_helper_damage_work[drm_kms_helper]

gt; > [ 28.380284] softirqs last enabled at (9464): [] > > __do_softirq+0x3fd/0x57c > > [ 28.381595] softirqs last disabled at (9381): [] > > call_on_stack+0x4c/0x60 > > [ 28.382878] ---[ end trace b5fac24d1c204ab3 ]--- > > > > > > To r

Re: [mm/gup] 47e29d32af: phoronix-test-suite.npb.FT.A.total_mop_s -45.0% regression

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:17:27AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 5:51 AM Jan Kara wrote: > > > > On Mon 16-11-20 19:35:31, John Hubbard wrote: > > > > > > On 11/16/20 6:48 PM, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > > > > > Greeting, > > > > > > > > FYI, we noticed a -45.0%

Re: [drm/i915/gem] 59dd13ad31: phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second -54.0% regression

| > > | > > | > > | > >5000 |-+ > > | > > | O > > | > >4000 > > +---+ > > > > > > > > > > [*] bisect-good sample > > [O] bisect-bad sample > > > > > > > > Disclaimer: > > Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are > > provided > > for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or > > software > > design or configuration may affect actual performance. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Oliver Sang > >

Re: [LKP] Re: [IB/srpt] c804af2c1d: last_state.test.blktests.exit_code.143

On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 09:59:29AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:02:36PM +0800, Sang, Oliver wrote: > > Hi, > > > > want to consult if all fix merged into mainline? > > > > we found below commit merged rdma updates into mainline > > rc2 probably fixes the error

Re: [btrfs] 3b54a0a703: WARNING:at_fs/btrfs/inode.c:#btrfs_finish_ordered_io[btrfs]

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:20:12PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > On 2020/9/16 上午11:32, Oliver Sang wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:00:40PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 2020/9/15 下午3:40, Qu Wenruo wrote: > >>> > >&g

Re: [sched/fair] 0b0695f2b3: phoronix-test-suite.compress-gzip.0.seconds 19.8% regression

On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 01:23:19PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 07:26:01PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 10:02, Vincent Guittot > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 10:28, Oliver Sang wrote: > > &g

Re: [sched/fair] 0b0695f2b3: phoronix-test-suite.compress-gzip.0.seconds 19.8% regression

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 07:26:01PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 10:02, Vincent Guittot > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 10:28, Oliver Sang wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 03:04:48PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:

Re: [sched/fair] 0b0695f2b3: phoronix-test-suite.compress-gzip.0.seconds 19.8% regression

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 03:04:48PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 19:09, Vincent Guittot > wrote: > > > > Hi Oliver, > > > > On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 16:05, kernel test robot > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Vincent Guittot, > > > > > > Below report FYI. > > > Last year, we

Re: [sched/fair] 0b0695f2b3: phoronix-test-suite.compress-gzip.0.seconds 19.8% regression

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:12:26PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > > On Fri, 15 May 2020 09:43:39 +0800 Oliver Sang wrote: > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 07:09:35PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > > Hi Oliver, > > > > > > On Thu, 14 May 2020 at

Re: [sched/fair] 0b0695f2b3: phoronix-test-suite.compress-gzip.0.seconds 19.8% regression

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 07:09:35PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 16:05, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > Hi Vincent Guittot, > > > > Below report FYI. > > Last year, we actually reported an improvement "[sched/fair] 0b0695f2b3: > > vm-scalability.median

Re: [LKP] [fs/namei.c] e013ec23b8: WARNING:at_fs/dcache.c:#dentry_free

On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 02:52:40PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 04:42:46PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 09:09:17PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > > [ 13.886602] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 541 at fs/dcache.c:338 >

Re: [LKP] [fs/namei.c] e013ec23b8: WARNING:at_fs/dcache.c:#dentry_free

On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 04:42:46PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 09:09:17PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > [ 13.886602] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 541 at fs/dcache.c:338 > > dentry_free+0x7f/0x90 > > [ 13.889208] Modules linked in: > > [ 13.890276] CPU: 0 PID: 541 Comm:

Re: [ext4] [confidence: ] 2f7f60cf9f: WARNING:at_lib/list_debug.c:#__list_add_valid

R08: R09: > > 5564e2fd94d5 > > [ 62.522183] R10: R11: 0206 R12: > > 5564e2fd6b08 > > [ 62.523770] R13: 00005564e2fd6b67 R14: 02f5 R15: > > > > [ 62.525457] ---[ end trace 6c35045d811b284c ]--- > > > > > > To reproduce: > > > > # build kernel > > cd linux > > cp config-5.3.0-rc5-00283-g2f7f60cf9fbcd .config > > make HOSTCC=gcc-7 CC=gcc-7 ARCH=x86_64 olddefconfig prepare > > modules_prepare bzImage modules > > make HOSTCC=gcc-7 CC=gcc-7 ARCH=x86_64 > > INSTALL_MOD_PATH= modules_install > > cd > > find lib/ | cpio -o -H newc --quiet | gzip > modules.cgz > > > > > > git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git > > cd lkp-tests > > bin/lkp qemu -k -m modules.cgz job-script # job-script is > > attached in this email > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > Oliver Sang > > >