0 sun4u aic7xxx
> 19: 1 584788 sun4u ohci_hcd:usb2
> 20: 0 0 sun4u ohci_hcd:usb3
> 21: 1467 sun4u ehci_hcd:usb1
> 22: 0 0 sun4u PSYCHO_PCIERR
> 24: 27308743
PSYCHO_PCIERR
24: 27308743 0 sun4u eth1
rayleigh:[~]
Is this only with eth2 ? It seems to be the only one to have interrupts
delivered to CPU0 and CPU2...
Just my $0.02 ;)
Paul
--
Paul RollandE-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net
Witbe.net SA
Hello,
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:42:07 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Paul Rolland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:37:04 +0100
>
> > I remember reading some time ago about a network driver to "simulate"
> &g
Hello,
I remember reading some time ago about a network driver to "simulate"
network default, for example packet loss...
Unfortunately, I can't find the post, neither in my mailbox nor in
archives...
Does anyone has an URL that you could send me ?
Regards,
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
Hello,
I remember reading some time ago about a network driver to simulate
network default, for example packet loss...
Unfortunately, I can't find the post, neither in my mailbox nor in
archives...
Does anyone has an URL that you could send me ?
Regards,
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
Hello,
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:42:07 -0800 (PST)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Paul Rolland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:37:04 +0100
I remember reading some time ago about a network driver to simulate
network default, for example packet loss...
Unfortunately
Hello,
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:29:55 +
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:13:46 -0800
> "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Fri 2007-12-14 10:02:57, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >
> > How long will that take to boot on a 386?
>
Hello,
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:29:55 +
Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:13:46 -0800
H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pavel Machek wrote:
On Fri 2007-12-14 10:02:57, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
How long will that take to boot on a 386?
Well the dumb
Hello,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:28:56 +0100
Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11-12-07 15:15, Rene Herman wrote:
>
> > On 11-12-07 14:32, Paul Rolland wrote:
> >
> This might be a bit more constant, I suppose. This serialises with cpuid.
> Don't see a d
Hello,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:16:01 +0100
Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11-12-07 13:08, David Newall wrote:
>
> > Rene Herman wrote:
> (*) some local testing shows it to be almost exactly that for both out and
> in on my own PC -- a little over. If anyone cares, see attached
Hello,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:16:01 +0100
Rene Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11-12-07 13:08, David Newall wrote:
Rene Herman wrote:
(*) some local testing shows it to be almost exactly that for both out and
in on my own PC -- a little over. If anyone cares, see attached little test
Hello,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:28:56 +0100
Rene Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11-12-07 15:15, Rene Herman wrote:
On 11-12-07 14:32, Paul Rolland wrote:
This might be a bit more constant, I suppose. This serialises with cpuid.
Don't see a difference locally, but perhaps you do
the value back ?
inb al,0x80
outb 0x80,al
I've been wondering since the beginning of this thread if the problem is not
just the value we put to port 0x80, not writing to the port...
Just my 0.02 Eur...
Paul
--
Paul RollandE-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net
Witbe.net SA
wondering since the beginning of this thread if the problem is not
just the value we put to port 0x80, not writing to the port...
Just my 0.02 Eur...
Paul
--
Paul RollandE-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net
Witbe.net SATel. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 77
Hello,
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:29:49 -0800
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TSCs on Core 2 Duo are supposed to be in sync unless CPU supports deep idle
> states like C2, C3. Can you send the full /proc/cpuinfo and full dmesg.
>
Sure I can...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# cat
Hello,
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:29:49 -0800
Pallipadi, Venkatesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TSCs on Core 2 Duo are supposed to be in sync unless CPU supports deep idle
states like C2, C3. Can you send the full /proc/cpuinfo and full dmesg.
Sure I can...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# cat
Hello,
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:23:15 +0900
Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 26/08/07, Paul Rolland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> My machine (an ASUS P5W-DH-Deluxe, Core2, 4Go RAM, 3 SATA and 2IDE) is
> >> reporting a :
> >> irq 23: nobody
Hello,
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:23:15 +0900
Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/08/07, Paul Rolland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My machine (an ASUS P5W-DH-Deluxe, Core2, 4Go RAM, 3 SATA and 2IDE) is
reporting a :
irq 23: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)
together
Hi Tejun,
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:23:15 +0900
Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 26/08/07, Paul Rolland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> My machine (an ASUS P5W-DH-Deluxe, Core2, 4Go RAM, 3 SATA and 2IDE) is
> >> reporting a :
> >> irq 23
Hi Tejun,
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:23:15 +0900
Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/08/07, Paul Rolland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My machine (an ASUS P5W-DH-Deluxe, Core2, 4Go RAM, 3 SATA and 2IDE) is
reporting a :
irq 23: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)
together
; What chipset ? 965gm ?
975x
Paul
--
Paul RollandE-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net
Witbe.net SATel. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 77
Les Collines de l'Arche Fax. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 99
F-92057 Paris La DefenseRI
--
Paul RollandE-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net
Witbe.net SATel. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 77
Les Collines de l'Arche Fax. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 99
F-92057 Paris La DefenseRIPE : PR12-RIPE
Please no HTML, I'm
Hello,
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:04:11 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me guess... this is a T61 or X61 ?
Bad luck ;)
This is an Asus P5W-DH Deluxe motherboard, with a Core2 6400 CPU,
a bunch of disk (2 IDE, 3 SATA, 1 CDRW and 1 DVDRW-DL), and a damned
Olitec PCI
Hi Tejun,
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:55:22 +0900
Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Rolland wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 23:56:59 +0930
> > David Newall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Paul Rolland "(
Hi Tejun,
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:55:22 +0900
Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Rolland wrote:
Hi David,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 23:56:59 +0930
David Newall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Rolland (???) wrote:
Hell, IRQ 23 is shared between libata and my modem
Hello,
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:04:11 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me guess... this is a T61 or X61 ?
Bad luck ;)
This is an Asus P5W-DH Deluxe motherboard, with a Core2 6400 CPU,
a bunch of disk (2 IDE, 3 SATA, 1 CDRW and 1 DVDRW-DL), and a damned
Olitec PCI V92
Hi David,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 23:56:59 +0930
David Newall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Rolland "(???) wrote:
> > Hell, IRQ 23 is shared between libata and my modem !!!
> >
>
> Tried using the modem?
When no problem is reported, both the libata
Hi David,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 23:56:59 +0930
David Newall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Rolland (???) wrote:
Hell, IRQ 23 is shared between libata and my modem !!!
Tried using the modem?
When no problem is reported, both the libata part and the modem are OK.
When the problem
=patch+cfg80211+initialisation
This is not present in 2.6.23-rc7 ! :(((
Paul
--
Paul RollandE-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net
Witbe.net SATel. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 77
Les Collines de l'Arche Fax. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 99
F-92057 P
+initialisation
This is not present in 2.6.23-rc7 ! :(((
Paul
--
Paul RollandE-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net
Witbe.net SATel. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 77
Les Collines de l'Arche Fax. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 99
F-92057 Paris La Defense
Hi Rob,
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:21:39 -0400
"Rob Hussey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/15/07, ポール・ロラン Paul Rolland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> I had this problem as well. It has to do with mac80211, cfg80211 and
> the rate cont
acktrace. Mine is different but at least, we are at least two
> to have the crash.
Well, I have it when compiling rtl8187 inside the kernel, but I still have to
try it as a module, to confirm we are facing the same bug...
Please allow me some time for that, I'll post an update.
R
Hello Stefan,
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 10:25:39 +0200
Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Rolland wrote:
> > getting too much of "No help text available"
> > usually results in people no more reading the help text.
>
> I assert that a Kconf
e menuconfig" user, let me say that I agree. Of course, I'm used
to rebuild kernel, but sometimes, some options are not clear, and the help
text is searched for. But, getting too much of "No help text available"
usually results in people no more reading the help text.
What about split
, and the help
text is searched for. But, getting too much of No help text available
usually results in people no more reading the help text.
What about splitting the screen to have the top half with the menu, and the
bottom half with the help ?
Paul
--
Paul Rolland
Hello Stefan,
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 10:25:39 +0200
Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Rolland wrote:
getting too much of No help text available
usually results in people no more reading the help text.
I assert that a Kconfig prompt (a visible Kconfig variable) _without_
help
are at least two
to have the crash.
Well, I have it when compiling rtl8187 inside the kernel, but I still have to
try it as a module, to confirm we are facing the same bug...
Please allow me some time for that, I'll post an update.
Regards,
Paul
--
Paul Rolland
Hi Rob,
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:21:39 -0400
Rob Hussey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/15/07, ポール・ロラン Paul Rolland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I had this problem as well. It has to do with mac80211, cfg80211 and
the rate control algorithm not initializing early enough in the boot
Hello Tejun,
On Sat, 08 Sep 2007 16:23:20 +0900
Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Rolland wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > My machine (an ASUS P5W-DH-Deluxe, Core2, 4Go RAM, 3 SATA and 2IDE) is
> > reporting a :
> > irq 23: nobody cared (try booting
Hello Tejun,
On Sat, 08 Sep 2007 16:23:20 +0900
Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Rolland wrote:
Hello,
My machine (an ASUS P5W-DH-Deluxe, Core2, 4Go RAM, 3 SATA and 2IDE) is
reporting a :
irq 23: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)
together with a Call Trace
Hello,
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:28:09 -0400
Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 08:30:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > <6>Linux agpgart interface v0.102
> > > +<6>rtc_cmos 00:03: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0
> > > +<4>rtc_cmos: probe of 00:03
Hello,
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:28:09 -0400
Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 08:30:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
6Linux agpgart interface v0.102
+6rtc_cmos 00:03: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0
+4rtc_cmos: probe of 00:03 failed with error -16
Hello,
I've a machine that has been installed with Intel Soft Raid on top
of 2 SATA disks.
I'm trying to have this work as a RAID-1 array.
Bios configuration has been done, using 128K chunk, and the kernel
(2.6.20.7) sees perfectly /dev/mapper/isw__RAID1
But, I'm facing two problems :
1
Hello,
I've a machine that has been installed with Intel Soft Raid on top
of 2 SATA disks.
I'm trying to have this work as a RAID-1 array.
Bios configuration has been done, using 128K chunk, and the kernel
(2.6.20.7) sees perfectly /dev/mapper/isw__RAID1
But, I'm facing two problems :
1
> Might want to 'cat /proc/mounts', and ponder the fact that a
> filesystem
> can be mounted and not listed in /etc/mtab, and then see if
> your system
> has 'udev' installed and enabled.
Damn ! You're right :
cat /proc/mounts | grep dev
none /dev tmpfs rw 0 0
and no, I don't have any udev
Hello,
I was trying to backup a machine using tar and the --one-file-system option
and I was getting an archive without /dev, but tar was spitting :
/dev: file is on a different filesystem; not dumped
So, I had a look at the code in tar, and the comparison is done on the
stat.st_dev field...
I
Hello,
I was trying to backup a machine using tar and the --one-file-system option
and I was getting an archive without /dev, but tar was spitting :
/dev: file is on a different filesystem; not dumped
So, I had a look at the code in tar, and the comparison is done on the
stat.st_dev field...
I
Might want to 'cat /proc/mounts', and ponder the fact that a
filesystem
can be mounted and not listed in /etc/mtab, and then see if
your system
has 'udev' installed and enabled.
Damn ! You're right :
cat /proc/mounts | grep dev
none /dev tmpfs rw 0 0
and no, I don't have any udev running,
> Oh... that's just weird. It seems you'll have to continue
> boot with the
> timeouts for the time being. Sorry about that.
Would you agree to a patch to add a kernel boot parameter to skip some
ata ports ?
I found some archives refering to some "ataX=noprobe", but it seems
to have no effect,
Oh... that's just weird. It seems you'll have to continue
boot with the
timeouts for the time being. Sorry about that.
Would you agree to a patch to add a kernel boot parameter to skip some
ata ports ?
I found some archives refering to some ataX=noprobe, but it seems
to have no effect, and
Doh ! Got that :
ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.2[B] -> GSI 23 (level, low) -> IRQ 23
ahci :00:1f.2: AHCI 0001.0100 32 slots 4 ports 3 Gbps 0xf impl SATA mode
ahci :00:1f.2: flags: 64bit ncq led clo pio slum part
ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xc208e900 ctl 0x
Hi,
> This is NCQ protocol violation on the drive's side shown on some early
> drives. No need to worry too much about it. The drive will just get
> blacklisted for NCQ and should work fine.
>
Thx.
Also, remember one of the problem I have, with ata2 going to timeout
because this port of the
Hello,
> Yeap, more than three HSM violations in ten minutes. That's the
> criteria for turning off NCQ. Good to see it working. It look like a
> lot because libata reports all active commands (can't help as on HSM
> failure, there's no way to determine which caused it) and the SCSI
> prints
Hello,
> Can you put the harddisk under high load and see what happens? How
> often do those errors occur? Care to post full dmesg?
I started again a stock 2.6.21-rc4, and ran that :
while (/bin/true); do tar jxf linux-2.6.19.1.tar.bz2; rm -rf linux-2.6.19.1;
echo -n "."; done
After
Hello,
Can you put the harddisk under high load and see what happens? How
often do those errors occur? Care to post full dmesg?
I started again a stock 2.6.21-rc4, and ran that :
while (/bin/true); do tar jxf linux-2.6.19.1.tar.bz2; rm -rf linux-2.6.19.1;
echo -n .; done
After several
Hello,
Yeap, more than three HSM violations in ten minutes. That's the
criteria for turning off NCQ. Good to see it working. It look like a
lot because libata reports all active commands (can't help as on HSM
failure, there's no way to determine which caused it) and the SCSI
prints
Hi,
This is NCQ protocol violation on the drive's side shown on some early
drives. No need to worry too much about it. The drive will just get
blacklisted for NCQ and should work fine.
Thx.
Also, remember one of the problem I have, with ata2 going to timeout
because this port of the ICH7
Doh ! Got that :
ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.2[B] - GSI 23 (level, low) - IRQ 23
ahci :00:1f.2: AHCI 0001.0100 32 slots 4 ports 3 Gbps 0xf impl SATA mode
ahci :00:1f.2: flags: 64bit ncq led clo pio slum part
ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xc208e900 ctl 0x
Hello,
> The kernel says that NCQ is turned off due to excessive
> errors. If your
> HSM violation is intermittent, it might not trigger tho.
I've just grep'ed thru all my messages, and I can't find anything
stating that NCQ is being turned off...
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
> If you leave it alone, does libata turn off NCQ and boot continues?
boot continues, but I can't tell anything about libata turning of NCQ...
I've had a bunch of them at some while while compiling some kernel, so it
was quite some time after booting.
Is there a message I can check for that
,
> > + /* NCQ is broken */
> > + { "Maxtor 6L250S0", NULL,
> ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ },
> >
> > /* Devices with NCQ limits */
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Rolland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> NAK - but add the f
NONCQ },
/* Devices with NCQ limits */
Signed-off-by: Paul Rolland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
With this applied, my machine has stopped all those painful messages.
dmesg now says :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/Kernels# dmesg | grep LBA
ata1.00: 490234752 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (not used)
ata2.00
to remember
this could be NCQ-related, and my disk should have been blacklisted,
but is this already in 2.6.21-rc4 ?
Regards,
Paul
Paul Rolland, rol(at)as2917.net
ex-AS2917 Network administrator and Peering Coordinator
--
Please no HTML, I'm not a browser - Pas d'HTML, je ne suis pas un
> > PS : I'd like to try 2.6.21-rc3, but it seems that this is
> breaking my
> > config : disk naming is no more the same, and I end up with a panic
> > Warning: unable to open an initial console
> > though i've been compiling with the same .config I was
> using for 2.6.21-rc2
>
> Gaah. Can
PS : I'd like to try 2.6.21-rc3, but it seems that this is
breaking my
config : disk naming is no more the same, and I end up with a panic
Warning: unable to open an initial console
though i've been compiling with the same .config I was
using for 2.6.21-rc2
Gaah. Can you get a log
to remember
this could be NCQ-related, and my disk should have been blacklisted,
but is this already in 2.6.21-rc4 ?
Regards,
Paul
Paul Rolland, rol(at)as2917.net
ex-AS2917 Network administrator and Peering Coordinator
--
Please no HTML, I'm not a browser - Pas d'HTML, je ne suis pas un
limits */
Signed-off-by: Paul Rolland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With this applied, my machine has stopped all those painful messages.
dmesg now says :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/Kernels# dmesg | grep LBA
ata1.00: 490234752 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (not used)
ata2.00: 640 sectors, multi 1: LBA
ata3.00
},
/* Devices with NCQ limits */
Signed-off-by: Paul Rolland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAK - but add the firmware to the match and you can have an Ack 8)
Second try, compiled _and_ boot tested, of course.
dmesg says :
ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
ata1.00: ATA-7
If you leave it alone, does libata turn off NCQ and boot continues?
boot continues, but I can't tell anything about libata turning of NCQ...
I've had a bunch of them at some while while compiling some kernel, so it
was quite some time after booting.
Is there a message I can check for that would
Hello,
The kernel says that NCQ is turned off due to excessive
errors. If your
HSM violation is intermittent, it might not trigger tho.
I've just grep'ed thru all my messages, and I can't find anything
stating that NCQ is being turned off...
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Hello Vincent,
> patched kernel. Now it looks more like 5 seconds faster!
> Wow.. nice work CK!
>
> 2.6.18.8 vanilla kernel:
> [ 48.185716] libata version 2.00 loaded.
> [ 49.838513] scsi0 : sata_nv
>
>
> 2.6.18.8-rsdl-0.30:
> [ 43.144312] libata version 2.00 loaded.
> [ 45.820504]
Hello,
> > That sounds a quite expensive solution ;)
>
> You should be able to just move the drive attached at ata1 to ata2.
> Please report whether that works.
I'll try to find an unused disk... As I said, these ports are part of
Asus EZRaid solution, and i'd prefer this piece of code not to
Hello,
> It involves a long timeout, so it's bothersome. This is caused by
> Silicon Image 4726/3726 storage processor (SATA Port Multiplier with
> extra features) attached to one of the ICH ports.
Yes, I think this is the part Asus is using for it's EZ-Raid feature
on this motherboard, and
Hello,
> Ok, so that's just a message irritation, not actually bothersome
> otherwise?
It is somewhat painful, because delays involved are quite long, and
it is not possible to explain the machine to "ignore" the port, and
skip to the next one...
> > The second problem is a Jmicron363
Hello Vincent,
patched kernel. Now it looks more like 5 seconds faster!
Wow.. nice work CK!
2.6.18.8 vanilla kernel:
[ 48.185716] libata version 2.00 loaded.
[ 49.838513] scsi0 : sata_nv
2.6.18.8-rsdl-0.30:
[ 43.144312] libata version 2.00 loaded.
[ 45.820504] Vendor:
Hello,
Ok, so that's just a message irritation, not actually bothersome
otherwise?
It is somewhat painful, because delays involved are quite long, and
it is not possible to explain the machine to ignore the port, and
skip to the next one...
The second problem is a Jmicron363 controler
Hello,
It involves a long timeout, so it's bothersome. This is caused by
Silicon Image 4726/3726 storage processor (SATA Port Multiplier with
extra features) attached to one of the ICH ports.
Yes, I think this is the part Asus is using for it's EZ-Raid feature
on this motherboard, and they
Hello,
That sounds a quite expensive solution ;)
You should be able to just move the drive attached at ata1 to ata2.
Please report whether that works.
I'll try to find an unused disk... As I said, these ports are part of
Asus EZRaid solution, and i'd prefer this piece of code not to try to
Hello,
> > Nope... I tried several patches from Tejun, and also some
> that Jeff posted
> > to linux-ide, but no luck. The only way to have this DVD-RW
> working is to
> > use irqpoll on the command line...
>
> So it has *never* worked? That's what I'm trying to see - you had a
> "before" and
Just one point that may be interesting, as it seems that this is IRQ
related : at the beginning of the dmesg, it seems that IRQ16 is used
for sky2/Yukon , but when reading /proc/interrupts, it has been remapped
to IRQ 505... Could this also affect libata ?
Regards,
Paul
Paul Rolland, rol
Hello,
> It seems like IRQ is not getting through. The first IRQ
> driven command is failing for you.
H
> Extract is :
> ata7: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x00019c00 ctl 0x00019882 bmdma
> 0x00019400 irq 16
> ata8: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x00019800 ctl
Hello,
It seems like IRQ is not getting through. The first IRQ
driven command is failing for you.
H
Extract is :
ata7: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x00019c00 ctl 0x00019882 bmdma
0x00019400 irq 16
ata8: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x00019800 ctl
Just one point that may be interesting, as it seems that this is IRQ
related : at the beginning of the dmesg, it seems that IRQ16 is used
for sky2/Yukon , but when reading /proc/interrupts, it has been remapped
to IRQ 505... Could this also affect libata ?
Regards,
Paul
Paul Rolland, rol
Hello,
Nope... I tried several patches from Tejun, and also some
that Jeff posted
to linux-ide, but no luck. The only way to have this DVD-RW
working is to
use irqpoll on the command line...
So it has *never* worked? That's what I'm trying to see - you had a
before and after dmesg
Hello,
> > Yes, it does, so it's a Good One (tm),
>
> And points out that $SUBJECT is misleading; the root cause of
> the oops isn't rtc_cmos. Workaround, don't enable the legacy
> driver for this hardware.
Well, sorry for that, but my point was that without enabling
CONFIG_DRV_RTC_CMOS and
Hello,
Yes, it does, so it's a Good One (tm),
And points out that $SUBJECT is misleading; the root cause of
the oops isn't rtc_cmos. Workaround, don't enable the legacy
driver for this hardware.
Well, sorry for that, but my point was that without enabling
CONFIG_DRV_RTC_CMOS and only
frozen
ata7.00: cmd a0/01:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0 cdb 0x12 data 36 in
res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
ata7: soft resetting port
ata7.00: configured for UDMA/44
ata7: EH complete
Hope this helps...
Regards,
Paul
Paul Rolland, rol(at)as2917.net
ex
Hello Adrian,
> does the patch in http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/23/184 fix your problem?
Yes, it does, so it's a Good One (tm), but I don't understand what's going
on then... My dmesg says, related to rtc :
...
rtc_cmos 00:03: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0
pnp: Device 00:03 does not
Hello,
> Your drive has some issues with NCQ and is scheduled to be blacklisted
> such that it isn't enabled. libata used to ignore the
> condition but now
> considers it NCQ protocol violation and fails all pending commands.
OK, do you need an hdparm report to fully identify the disk ?
>
Hello,
> 1. Has it ever worked with the previous kernels?
I can't tell, this machine is new, and it never booted something that
was not a 2.6.20 or 2.6.21.
> 2. If you connect a harddisk to pata_jmicron, does it work?
>
> 3. Does applying the attached patch fix your problem?
Will do these two
Hello,
1. Has it ever worked with the previous kernels?
I can't tell, this machine is new, and it never booted something that
was not a 2.6.20 or 2.6.21.
2. If you connect a harddisk to pata_jmicron, does it work?
3. Does applying the attached patch fix your problem?
Will do these two
Hello,
Your drive has some issues with NCQ and is scheduled to be blacklisted
such that it isn't enabled. libata used to ignore the
condition but now
considers it NCQ protocol violation and fails all pending commands.
OK, do you need an hdparm report to fully identify the disk ?
libata
Hello Adrian,
does the patch in http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/23/184 fix your problem?
Yes, it does, so it's a Good One (tm), but I don't understand what's going
on then... My dmesg says, related to rtc :
...
rtc_cmos 00:03: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0
pnp: Device 00:03 does not
frozen
ata7.00: cmd a0/01:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0 cdb 0x12 data 36 in
res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
ata7: soft resetting port
ata7.00: configured for UDMA/44
ata7: EH complete
Hope this helps...
Regards,
Paul
Paul Rolland, rol(at)as2917.net
ex
Hello,
My machine is Oopsing at boot time, and ends up in a panic when I have :
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS=y
in my .config
Here is a transcript of the Oops - no serial console at the moment - I
made my best to copy without a mistake !
rtc_cmos 00:03: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0
Unable to
Hello,
My machine is Oopsing at boot time, and ends up in a panic when I have :
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS=y
in my .config
Here is a transcript of the Oops - no serial console at the moment - I
made my best to copy without a mistake !
rtc_cmos 00:03: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0
Unable to
retrying in 5 secs
ata9.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xef)
ata9.00: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x4)
ata9.00: disabled
scsi9 : pata_jmicron
But it seems Alan's patch doesn't touch the jmicron code, so this may
explain why it doesn't help...
Regards,
Paul
Paul Rolland, rol(at)as2917.net
ex-AS291
e sda: write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support
DPO or FUA
This last part was not present when booting stock 2.6.21-rc1
Any other info you may need, please ask.
Regards,
Paul
Paul Rolland, rol(at)as2917.net
ex-AS2917 Network administrator and Peering Coordinator
--
Please no HTM
, doesn't support
DPO or FUA
This last part was not present when booting stock 2.6.21-rc1
Any other info you may need, please ask.
Regards,
Paul
Paul Rolland, rol(at)as2917.net
ex-AS2917 Network administrator and Peering Coordinator
--
Please no HTML, I'm not a browser - Pas d'HTML, je ne
in 5 secs
ata9.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xef)
ata9.00: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x4)
ata9.00: disabled
scsi9 : pata_jmicron
But it seems Alan's patch doesn't touch the jmicron code, so this may
explain why it doesn't help...
Regards,
Paul
Paul Rolland, rol(at)as2917.net
ex-AS2917 Network
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
