>>
>> /* Do we need to handle the stepping? */
>> if (is_default_overflow_handler(wp))
>> step = 1;
>> -
>> -unlock:
>> - rcu_read_unlock();
>> }
>> + if (min_dist > 0 && min_dist != -1) {
>> + /* No exact match fou
On 13 October 2016 at 11:22, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday 12 October 2016 04:46 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>>>
>>> Since, arm64 can support all offset within a double word limit.
>>> Therefore,
>>> now support other lengths within th
On 5 November 2015 at 20:29, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 11/05/2015 01:35 PM, Pavel Labath wrote:
>> That said, it seems to me that this could be a generally useful
>> feature. For the test suite, I can insert a sleep (even a large one,
>> to be sure), but this seems like a sub
On 5 November 2015 at 05:25, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 02:43 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> Oh, I don't think "Automagically if ptrace" makes any sense... What makes
>> ptrace special? Afaics nothing.
>>
>> We can modify this test-case to use signals/futexes/whatever to let the
>> the paren
Hello Oleg, everyone,
I have noticed something, which may be considered a race in the
interaction of ptrace and pseudoterminal interfaces. Basically, what
happens is this:
- we have two processes: A and B. B has the slave end of the pty open,
A has the master. A is tracing B.
- B writes some data
(eventually) reported?
cheers,
pl
On 23 March 2015 at 09:42, Pavel Labath wrote:
> On 21 March 2015 at 18:57, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> On 03/20, Pavel Labath wrote:
>>>
>>> One difference I see though is that in
>>> our test, we are not sending any additional signals to
On 21 March 2015 at 18:57, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 03/20, Pavel Labath wrote:
>>
>> One difference I see though is that in
>> our test, we are not sending any additional signals to the thread in
>> question (at least we shouldn't be sending them, but we are
Sending again, this time as plain text (I hope)...
On 20 March 2015 at 18:46, Pavel Labath wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the super quick response. :)
>
> I am at home now, so I don't have access to the same machine to run the test.
> I will run it on monday and let
8 matches
Mail list logo
