Re: Asterisk deadlocks since Kernel 4.1

Hello Hannes, On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:40:32PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > > git bisect tells me it stopped working after those two commits were applied: > > > > commit d48623677191e0f035d7afd344f92cf880b01f8e > > Author: Herbert Xu > > Date: Tue Sep 22 11:38:56 2015 +0800 > > > >

Re: Strange PF_NETLINK NETLINK_ROUTE stall: netlink: Fix autobind race condition that leads to zero port ID

Hello, On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 09:10:08AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 04:23:54PM +0100, Philipp Hahn wrote: > > > > I observed a strange stall in a multi-threaded process (originally > > OpenLDAP slapd), which stalls during a call to getaddrinfo() after > > upgrading the

Re: Strange PF_NETLINK NETLINK_ROUTE stall: netlink: Fix autobind race condition that leads to zero port ID

Hello, On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 09:10:08AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 04:23:54PM +0100, Philipp Hahn wrote: > > > > I observed a strange stall in a multi-threaded process (originally > > OpenLDAP slapd), which stalls during a call to getaddrinfo() after > > upgrading the

Re: Asterisk deadlocks since Kernel 4.1

Hello Hannes, On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:40:32PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > > git bisect tells me it stopped working after those two commits were applied: > > > > commit d48623677191e0f035d7afd344f92cf880b01f8e > > Author: Herbert Xu > > Date: Tue Sep 22

RFH: How to correctly request a back-port / cherry-pick for stable 3.10?

Hello, I've found and debugged a problem in 3.10.54, which is fixed by commit 8915aa27d5efbb9185357175b0acf884325565f9, which is in 3.11. I'd like to request the commit being cherry-picked into 3.11, but reading Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt confuses me, as all my previous attempts seem

RFH: How to correctly request a back-port / cherry-pick for stable 3.10?

Hello, I've found and debugged a problem in 3.10.54, which is fixed by commit 8915aa27d5efbb9185357175b0acf884325565f9, which is in 3.11. I'd like to request the commit being cherry-picked into 3.11, but reading Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt confuses me, as all my previous attempts seem

Re: [alsa-devel] [BUG] 3.10.[01] modprobe snd-... hangs

dule() at the init phase. As a workaround, call the > registration part asynchronously. (And, this is a better approache > irrespective of the hang fix.) > > Reported-by: Philipp Matthias Hahn > Cc: > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai > --- > sound/core/seq/oss/seq_oss_init.c | 16 +

Re: [alsa-devel] [BUG] 3.10.[01] modprobe snd-... hangs

. As a workaround, call the registration part asynchronously. (And, this is a better approache irrespective of the hang fix.) Reported-by: Philipp Matthias Hahn pmh...@pmhahn.de Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de --- sound/core/seq/oss/seq_oss_init.c | 16

[BUG] 3.10.[01] modprobe snd-... hangs

Hello, My x86_64 systems has some trouble loading some ALSA snd-* modules since the upgrade to 3.10.[01]: Several automatic modprobe calls hang, but loading snd-intel-hda and snd-audio-usb by hand still works. # ps axf 460 ?S 0:00 \_ [kworker/u8:3] 1087 ?S 0:00 |

[BUG] 3.10.[01] modprobe snd-... hangs

Hello, My x86_64 systems has some trouble loading some ALSA snd-* modules since the upgrade to 3.10.[01]: Several automatic modprobe calls hang, but loading snd-intel-hda and snd-audio-usb by hand still works. # ps axf 460 ?S 0:00 \_ [kworker/u8:3] 1087 ?S 0:00 |

[PATCH] linux-2.6.24/drivers/hid/hid-input.c

In hidinput_configure_usage(device), IS_CHICONY_TACTICAL_PAD(devic) gets passed the 'device' parameter. But that macro still references its parameter by 'device' instead of by its local name 'x'. Signed-off-by: Philipp Matthias Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux/drivers/hid/hid-i

[PATCH] linux-2.6.24/drivers/hid/hid-input.c

In hidinput_configure_usage(device), IS_CHICONY_TACTICAL_PAD(devic) gets passed the 'device' parameter. But that macro still references its parameter by 'device' instead of by its local name 'x'. Signed-off-by: Philipp Matthias Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux/drivers/hid/hid-input.c 2008

Re: [2.6.23] IBM X41 looses time after Suspend2Disk

Hello! On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 10:08:01PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > On Monday, 29 October 2007 21:19, Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote: > > > > I have an IBM X41 tablet pc running 2.6.23 with the following problem: > > > > Suspend2Ram work fine, but wh

Re: [2.6.23] IBM X41 looses time after Suspend2Disk

Hello! On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 10:08:01PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: On Monday, 29 October 2007 21:19, Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote: I have an IBM X41 tablet pc running 2.6.23 with the following problem: Suspend2Ram work fine, but when I do a Suspend2Disk (echo disk /sys/power

Re: [2.6.23] IBM X41 looses time after Suspend2Disk

Hello Rafael, Pavel! Thank you both for the fast help. On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 10:05:10PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, 29 October 2007 21:19, Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote: > > I have an IBM X41 tablet pc running 2.6.23 with the following problem: > > Suspen

Re: [2.6.23] IBM X41 looses time after Suspend2Disk

Hello Rafael, Pavel! Thank you both for the fast help. On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 10:05:10PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday, 29 October 2007 21:19, Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote: I have an IBM X41 tablet pc running 2.6.23 with the following problem: Suspend2Ram work fine, but when I

[2.6.23] IBM X41 looses time after Suspend2Disk

Hello Thomas, Pavel, Rafael! I have an IBM X41 tablet pc running 2.6.23 with the following problem: Suspend2Ram work fine, but when I do a Suspend2Disk (echo disk > /sys/power/state), the notebook hangs showing the following lines: Stopping tasks ... done. Shrinking memory... done

[2.6.23] IBM X41 looses time after Suspend2Disk

Hello Thomas, Pavel, Rafael! I have an IBM X41 tablet pc running 2.6.23 with the following problem: Suspend2Ram work fine, but when I do a Suspend2Disk (echo disk /sys/power/state), the notebook hangs showing the following lines: Stopping tasks ... done. Shrinking memory... done

Re: [PATCH] NTFS error messages: replace static char pointers by static char arrays

Hello! On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 02:40:35PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 01:55:42AM +0400, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote: > > The patch below contains a small code clean-up for the NTFS driver: all > > static char pointers to error message strings have been replaced by > >

Re: [PATCH] NTFS error messages: replace static char pointers by static char arrays

Hello! On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 02:40:35PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote: On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 01:55:42AM +0400, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote: The patch below contains a small code clean-up for the NTFS driver: all static char pointers to error message strings have been replaced by static char

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Btrfs: a copy on write, snapshotting FS

Hello! On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 08:04:57AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:11:13AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote: > > Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: > > > > > > I would also suggest one more feature: support for block level > > > de-duplication. I mean: ... > > > That would be

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Btrfs: a copy on write, snapshotting FS

Hello! On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 08:04:57AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:11:13AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote: Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: I would also suggest one more feature: support for block level de-duplication. I mean: ... That would be very usable

Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2

Hello! On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 02:20:19PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: ... > +++ b/Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt ... > +Consider a typical block of kernel code: > + > +spin_lock(_lock); > +do_something_on(_data); ^^^ > +

Re: [PATCH] volatile considered harmful, take 2

Hello! On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 02:20:19PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: ... +++ b/Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt ... +Consider a typical block of kernel code: + +spin_lock(the_lock); +do_something_on(shared_data); ^^^ +

Re: [PATA] Failed to set xfermode on LITE-ON LTR-48246S

Hello Tejun! On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:46:07AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:10:10PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > * Does applying the attached patch over unpatched 2.6.20.1 fix the > > > problem? > > >

Re: [PATA] Failed to set xfermode on LITE-ON LTR-48246S

Hello Tejun! On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:46:07AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote: On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:10:10PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: * Does applying the attached patch over unpatched 2.6.20.1 fix the problem? Yes, it seems to fix it. (testes on top

Re: [PATA] Failed to set xfermode on LITE-ON LTR-48246S

Helo Tejun! On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:10:10PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote: > > As reported by John Williams and others like in > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide@vger.kernel.org/msg03088.html > > I too have a problem with 2.6.20.1 using a

Re: [PATA] Failed to set xfermode on LITE-ON LTR-48246S

Helo Tejun! On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:10:10PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote: As reported by John Williams and others like in http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide@vger.kernel.org/msg03088.html I too have a problem with 2.6.20.1 using ata_piix not detecting the CD

Re: [PATA] Failed to set xfermode on LITE-ON LTR-48246S

Hello! As reported by John Williams and others like in http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide@vger.kernel.org/msg03088.html I too have a problem with 2.6.20.1 using ata_piix not detecting the CD-ROM any more. Applying the patch from http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/24 did not help, but additionally

Re: [PATA] Failed to set xfermode on LITE-ON LTR-48246S

Hello! As reported by John Williams and others like in http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide@vger.kernel.org/msg03088.html I too have a problem with 2.6.20.1 using ata_piix not detecting the CD-ROM any more. Applying the patch from http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/24 did not help, but additionally

[PATCH] saa7146_i2c device model integration

Hello! Integrate saa7146_i2c adapter into device model: Moves entries from /sys/device/platform to /sys/device/pci*. Signed-off-by: Philipp Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux/drivers/media/common/saa7146_i2c.c2004-10-26 22:24:09.0 +0200 +++ linux/drivers/media/common/saa7146_i2c.c

[PATCH] saa7146_i2c device model integration

Hello! Integrate saa7146_i2c adapter into device model: Moves entries from /sys/device/platform to /sys/device/pci*. Signed-off-by: Philipp Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux/drivers/media/common/saa7146_i2c.c2004-10-26 22:24:09.0 +0200 +++ linux/drivers/media/common/saa7146_i2c.c

Re: Linux-2.6.13-rc6: aic7xxx testers please..

Hello Michael! On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 02:37:20PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >I got the following OOPS from running "alevtd -F -d -v /dev/vbi0" with > >my Siemens-DVB-C on a Dual-i686-600. I'm able to reproduce this even > >running a 2.6.12-rc6 without the nvidia module tainting the

Re: Linux-2.6.13-rc6: aic7xxx testers please..

Hello! On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 11:47:53AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Apart from some reverts and the aic7xxx performance regression fix, > there's arm and ppc updates, and some PCI resource allocation updates that > hopefully will reduce the number of machines (especially laptopns) that >

Re: Linux-2.6.13-rc6: aic7xxx testers please..

Hello! On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 11:47:53AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > James and gang found the aic7xxx slowdown that happened after 2.6.12, and > we'd like to get particular testing that it's fixed, so if you have a > relevant machine, please do test this. I just tried 2.6.13-rc6 after my

Re: Linux-2.6.13-rc6: aic7xxx testers please..

Hello! On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 11:47:53AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: Apart from some reverts and the aic7xxx performance regression fix, there's arm and ppc updates, and some PCI resource allocation updates that hopefully will reduce the number of machines (especially laptopns) that have

Re: Linux-2.6.13-rc6: aic7xxx testers please..

Hello! On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 11:47:53AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: James and gang found the aic7xxx slowdown that happened after 2.6.12, and we'd like to get particular testing that it's fixed, so if you have a relevant machine, please do test this. I just tried 2.6.13-rc6 after my last

Re: Linux-2.6.13-rc6: aic7xxx testers please..

Hello Michael! On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 02:37:20PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got the following OOPS from running alevtd -F -d -v /dev/vbi0 with my Siemens-DVB-C on a Dual-i686-600. I'm able to reproduce this even running a 2.6.12-rc6 without the nvidia module tainting the kernel. So

Re: Zip: what does that mean?

On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Gregoire Favre wrote: > I have an IDE 250Mb Zip, it work fine, but I can see: > > Jun 11 23:52:35 greg kernel: ide-floppy: hdc: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = > 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0 > Jun 11 23:52:37 greg kernel: hdc: unknown partition table > Jun 11 23:52:37 greg kernel: hdc:

Re: Zip: what does that mean?

On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Gregoire Favre wrote: I have an IDE 250Mb Zip, it work fine, but I can see: Jun 11 23:52:35 greg kernel: ide-floppy: hdc: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0 Jun 11 23:52:37 greg kernel: hdc: unknown partition table Jun 11 23:52:37 greg kernel: hdc:

Re: PROBLEM: isdn connecting error(auth failed) with 2.4.4-ac9 and2.4.5

On Thu, 31 May 2001, CZUCZY Gergely wrote: > May 27 15:00:52 kign ipppd[391]: Remote message: Access Denied > May 27 15:00:52 kign ipppd[391]: PAP authentication failed You passwors in /etc/{ppp,isdn}/pap-secrets is wrong. > Modules Loaded NVdriver hisax isdn slhc au8820

Re: PROBLEM: isdn connecting error(auth failed) with 2.4.4-ac9 and2.4.5

On Thu, 31 May 2001, CZUCZY Gergely wrote: May 27 15:00:52 kign ipppd[391]: Remote message: Access Denied May 27 15:00:52 kign ipppd[391]: PAP authentication failed You passwors in /etc/{ppp,isdn}/pap-secrets is wrong. Modules Loaded NVdriver hisax isdn slhc au8820

Re: nfs mount by label not working.

On Wed, 23 May 2001, Dave Mielke wrote: > Using kernel 2.2.17-14 as supplied by RedHat, and using mount from > mount-2.9u-4, mounting by label using the -L option does not work. > > mount -L backup1 /a Do you realy mean what you wrote in the Subject line: Subject : Re: *nfs* mount by label

[BUG][PATCH] linux-2.4.5-pre5/drivers/isdn/avmb1/capifs.c

Hello lkml! capifs.c is broken in 2.4.5-pre5: - A forward declaration of capifs_new_inode() is needed - The semicolon at the end of line musrt be deleted - struct inode * was not declared --- linux-2.4.5/drivers/isdn/avmb1/capifs.c.origThu May 24 08:42:43 2001 +++

[BUG][PATCH] linux-2.4.5-pre5/drivers/isdn/avmb1/capifs.c

Hello lkml! capifs.c is broken in 2.4.5-pre5: - A forward declaration of capifs_new_inode() is needed - The semicolon at the end of line musrt be deleted - struct inode * was not declared --- linux-2.4.5/drivers/isdn/avmb1/capifs.c.origThu May 24 08:42:43 2001 +++

Re: nfs mount by label not working.

On Wed, 23 May 2001, Dave Mielke wrote: Using kernel 2.2.17-14 as supplied by RedHat, and using mount from mount-2.9u-4, mounting by label using the -L option does not work. mount -L backup1 /a Do you realy mean what you wrote in the Subject line: Subject : Re: *nfs* mount by label not

Re: [PATCH] Re: [OOPS] 8139too

On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Does the attached patch solve the problem? I didn't have a crash so far, so until now it look's okay. I would like to say "you fixed it", but that's the problem with bugs: You can prove, there are no bugs. I will tell you as soon as possible if it should

Re: [PATCH] Re: [OOPS] 8139too

On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote: Does the attached patch solve the problem? I didn't have a crash so far, so until now it look's okay. I would like to say "you fixed it", but that's the problem with bugs: You can prove, there are no bugs. I will tell you as soon as possible if it should

Re: [OOPS] 8139too

On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote: > > after APM laptop suspend to disk > > 8139too is build-in, not pcmcia > > I often get hangups after suspend-to-disk if I'm connected to a > > hub/switch. > > This is the first oops I've actually seen and copied it by hand: > Was the nic connected or

Re: [OOPS] 8139too

On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote: after APM laptop suspend to disk 8139too is build-in, not pcmcia I often get hangups after suspend-to-disk if I'm connected to a hub/switch. This is the first oops I've actually seen and copied it by hand: Was the nic connected or not? The

[OOPS] 8139too

Hello LKML! i686 2.4.2 UP+kdb+lm_sensors+pcmcia after APM laptop suspend to disk 8139too is build-in, not pcmcia I often get hangups after suspend-to-disk if I'm connected to a hub/switch. This is the first oops I've actually seen and copied it by hand: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer

[OOPS] 8139too

Hello LKML! i686 2.4.2 UP+kdb+lm_sensors+pcmcia after APM laptop suspend to disk 8139too is build-in, not pcmcia I often get hangups after suspend-to-disk if I'm connected to a hub/switch. This is the first oops I've actually seen and copied it by hand: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer

[PATCH] acpi/cpu.c on SMP

Hello! acpi_idle is disabled on SMP systems with more then 1 cpu. The boot message sais otherwise. This patch corrects the message. --- linux-2.4.2/drivers/acpi/cpu.c.orig Sat Feb 10 12:01:52 2001 +++ linux-2.4.2/drivers/acpi/cpu.c Thu Feb 15 08:54:16 2001 @@ -335,13 +335,12 @@

[PATCH] acpi/cpu.c on SMP

Hello! acpi_idle is disabled on SMP systems with more then 1 cpu. The boot message sais otherwise. This patch corrects the message. --- linux-2.4.2/drivers/acpi/cpu.c.orig Sat Feb 10 12:01:52 2001 +++ linux-2.4.2/drivers/acpi/cpu.c Thu Feb 15 08:54:16 2001 @@ -335,13 +335,12 @@

Re: WOL failure after shutdown

On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, James Brents wrote: > Sorry, I wrote that in a hurry. Its a 3Com PCI 3c905C Tornado. I can > successfully use wakeonlan if I power off the machine immeadiatly after > turning it on. Using the shutdown command, which it will when I need it > to power back up, it will not

Re: WOL failure after shutdown

On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, James Brents wrote: Sorry, I wrote that in a hurry. Its a 3Com PCI 3c905C Tornado. I can successfully use wakeonlan if I power off the machine immeadiatly after turning it on. Using the shutdown command, which it will when I need it to power back up, it will not work.

Re: Problems with irda (irlap, ircomm)

On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Fredrik Falk wrote: > Version: "Linux version 2.4.2-pre2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.96 Please update to pre3. There ware some irda-updated from Dag. > 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.0)) #1 SMP Sat Feb 10 02:26:51 CET 2001"

Re: Problems with irda (irlap, ircomm)

On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Fredrik Falk wrote: Version: "Linux version 2.4.2-pre2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.96 Please update to pre3. There ware some irda-updated from Dag. 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.0)) #1 SMP Sat Feb 10 02:26:51 CET 2001" I

Re: Firewall netlink question...

On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Scaramanga wrote: > Under Linux 2.2.x I used to be able to use ipchains to send packet to a > netlink socket so that my userspace application could further analyze > the packet data. > > Since kernel 2.4 and iptables, I have not enjoyed the same functionality, > has it been

Re: Firewall netlink question...

On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Scaramanga wrote: Under Linux 2.2.x I used to be able to use ipchains to send packet to a netlink socket so that my userspace application could further analyze the packet data. Since kernel 2.4 and iptables, I have not enjoyed the same functionality, has it been

Re: FS callback routines

On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Sean R. Bright wrote: > I was writing a user space application to monitor a folder's contents. The > folder itself contained 100 folders, and each of those contained 24 folders. > While writing the code to traverse the directory structure I realized that > instead of my

automount doesn't unmount

Hello! I'm using the kernel automounter to mount several cdrom's and partitions on my smp-box. When the mount expires they aren't automatically unmounted. Forcing a 'kill -SIGUSR1 `pidof automount`' works for some devices, but others stay. $ umount /auto/install umount: /auto/install: device

automount doesn't unmount

Hello! I'm using the kernel automounter to mount several cdrom's and partitions on my smp-box. When the mount expires they aren't automatically unmounted. Forcing a 'kill -SIGUSR1 `pidof automount`' works for some devices, but others stay. $ umount /auto/install umount: /auto/install: device

[PATCH] linux-2.4.0-test7/driver/sbus/char/vfc_dev.c

Hello! I'm just trying to compile a kernel for my sparc and found a bug in the above file: In line 170: dev->de = devfs_register (devfs_handle, devname, DEVFS_FL_DEFAULT, VFC_MAJOR, instance, S_IFCHR | S_IRUSR |

[PATCH] linux-2.4.0-test7/driver/sbus/char/vfc_dev.c

Hello! I'm just trying to compile a kernel for my sparc and found a bug in the above file: In line 170: dev-de = devfs_register (devfs_handle, devname, DEVFS_FL_DEFAULT, VFC_MAJOR, instance, S_IFCHR | S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR,

Multiple test_if_zero

Hello! Just a note: The patch to test8-pre3 contains 2 definitions of a function to test is a memory-block is zero: fs/buffer.c: int mem_is_zero(char *p, unsigned len) fs/ext2/inode.c: static inline int all_zeroes(u32 *p, u32 *q) driver/usb/hid.c: static __inline__ int search(__s32 *array,

Multiple test_if_zero

Hello! Just a note: The patch to test8-pre3 contains 2 definitions of a function to test is a memory-block is zero: fs/buffer.c: int mem_is_zero(char *p, unsigned len) fs/ext2/inode.c: static inline int all_zeroes(u32 *p, u32 *q) driver/usb/hid.c: static __inline__ int search(__s32 *array,