ec.org ---
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 02:56:43PM -0500, Phillip Ezolt wrote:
> > What data structure's would I look at? What should I investigate to
> > verify this?
>
> The relevant code is in arch/alpha/kernel/core_cia.c
&
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 02:56:43PM -0500, Phillip Ezolt wrote:
> > What data structure's would I look at? What should I investigate to
> > verify this?
>
> In the arch/alpha/kernel/pci_iommu.c change
> #define DEBUG_ALLOC 0
> to
> #define DEBUG_ALLOC 2
>
> Perhaps thi
:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 02:56:43PM -0500, Phillip Ezolt wrote:
What data structure's would I look at? What should I investigate to
verify this?
In the arch/alpha/kernel/pci_iommu.c change
#define DEBUG_ALLOC 0
to
#define DEBUG_ALLOC 2
Perhaps this will give us more info.
At the first
- See the results at www.spec.org ---
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:30:10PM -0500, Phillip Ezolt wrote:
> > Any ideas? (Or patches that I can test... ;-) )
>
> miata seems to use cia southbridge so it should set an
Ivan,
I have tried test12-pre3 with and without your patch, it fails in the same
way.
The Qlogic SCSI controller continues to fail if we have >1 gig in the machine.
(But works fine without it.)
Any ideas? (Or patches that I can test... ;-) )
Thanks,
--Phil
Compaq: High Performance Server
Ivan,
I have tried test12-pre3 with and without your patch, it fails in the same
way.
The Qlogic SCSI controller continues to fail if we have 1 gig in the machine.
(But works fine without it.)
Any ideas? (Or patches that I can test... ;-) )
Thanks,
--Phil
Compaq: High Performance Server
the results at www.spec.org ---
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:30:10PM -0500, Phillip Ezolt wrote:
Any ideas? (Or patches that I can test... ;-) )
miata seems to use cia southbridge so it should set an iommu direct mapping
large 2G. So it's
PROTECTED]
--- See the results at www.spec.org ---
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 03:02:42PM -0500, Phillip Ezolt wrote:
> > Qlogic SCSI support seems broken on 2.4.0-test11 on a Miata (Digital Personal
>WorkS
Hi All,
Qlogic SCSI support seems broken on 2.4.0-test11 on a Miata (Digital Personal
WorkStation 600au).
When starting up, we get a machine check after initialing the qlogic SCSI code.
Using the Alpha kgdb, we figured out that the code is dying in scsi_wait_request().
Here's the backtrace:
Hi All,
Qlogic SCSI support seems broken on 2.4.0-test11 on a Miata (Digital Personal
WorkStation 600au).
When starting up, we get a machine check after initialing the qlogic SCSI code.
Using the Alpha kgdb, we figured out that the code is dying in scsi_wait_request().
Here's the backtrace:
PROTECTED]
--- See the results at www.spec.org ---
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 03:02:42PM -0500, Phillip Ezolt wrote:
Qlogic SCSI support seems broken on 2.4.0-test11 on a Miata (Digital Personal
WorkStation 600au).
When
11 matches
Mail list logo
