Jonathan Morton wrote:
> I should instead write 59 ±2°C, since that is the most precision
> I can possibly know it to. With some advanced measuring techniques
> it *may* be acceptable to write 59.43 ±2°C *at most*, and then only
> if you really know why you need the extra information.
It's
Jonathan Morton wrote:
I should instead write 59 ±2°C, since that is the most precision
I can possibly know it to. With some advanced measuring techniques
it *may* be acceptable to write 59.43 ±2°C *at most*, and then only
if you really know why you need the extra information.
It's easy to
Bind 8.2.4 was released on May 17th, with the standard
comment "BIND 8.2.4 is the latest version of ISC BIND 8.
We strongly recommend that you upgrade to BIND 9.1 or, if
that is not immediately possible, to BIND 8.2.4 due to
certain security vulnerabilities in previous versions."
However, there
Bind 8.2.4 was released on May 17th, with the standard
comment BIND 8.2.4 is the latest version of ISC BIND 8.
We strongly recommend that you upgrade to BIND 9.1 or, if
that is not immediately possible, to BIND 8.2.4 due to
certain security vulnerabilities in previous versions.
However, there
James Sutherland wrote:
> Except you can't retry without ECN, because DaveM wants to do
> a Microsoft and force ECN on everyone, whether they like it
> or not. If ECN is so wonderful, why doesn't anybody actually
> WANT to use it anyway?
And there's the rub. Whether ECN is wonderful or not,
James Sutherland wrote:
Except you can't retry without ECN, because DaveM wants to do
a Microsoft and force ECN on everyone, whether they like it
or not. If ECN is so wonderful, why doesn't anybody actually
WANT to use it anyway?
And there's the rub. Whether ECN is wonderful or not,
6 matches
Mail list logo
