Re: [Dri-devel] DRM patch for Linux 2.4.0-prerelease

2001-01-04 Thread Rik Faith
On Thu 4 Jan 2001 14:27:22 -0700, Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like this patch goes further than syncing with xfree 4.0.2, > but syncs with the dri trunk instead. There has been a version bump > in the mga drm module on the dri trunk to add a 'blit' ioctl. XFree >

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM patch for Linux 2.4.0-prerelease

2001-01-04 Thread Rik Faith
On Thu 4 Jan 2001 14:27:22 -0700, Keith Whitwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It looks like this patch goes further than syncing with xfree 4.0.2, but syncs with the dri trunk instead. There has been a version bump in the mga drm module on the dri trunk to add a 'blit' ioctl. XFree 4.0.2

Re: Happy new year^H^H^H^Hkernel..

2001-01-02 Thread Rik Faith
On Tue 2 Jan 2001 08:32:45 +1100, Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jan 2001 09:39:38 -0800 (PST), > Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On 1 Jan 2001, Adam Sampson wrote: > >> > >> It appears to work (even with the reiserfs patch with the obvious > >> Makefile

Re: Happy new year^H^H^H^Hkernel..

2001-01-02 Thread Rik Faith
On Tue 2 Jan 2001 08:32:45 +1100, Keith Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 1 Jan 2001 09:39:38 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1 Jan 2001, Adam Sampson wrote: It appears to work (even with the reiserfs patch with the obvious Makefile tweak), but the drm

Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work with modversions

2000-10-18 Thread Rik Faith
On Wed 18 Oct 2000 19:23:54 +0100, David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't you need to deal with the !CONFIG_AGP case correctly? This should already be dealt with in the Makefile -- if !CONFIG_AGP, then the file that we've been talking about (agpsupport.c) isn't compiled. (So,

Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work with modversions

2000-10-18 Thread Rik Faith
On Wed 18 Oct 2000 10:49:24 -0700, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you >wrote: > > > > > I have no idea what the get_module_symbol() code in question is trying to > > > do, but this should

Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work with modversions

2000-10-18 Thread Rik Faith
On Wed 18 Oct 2000 09:43:43 -0700, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, John Levon wrote: > > > > I have only compile-tested the patch below with 2.4.0test10pre3 and > > 2.2.18pre16 (some fuzz on apply). Hope it's right, I can't test if it > > fixes the

Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work with modversions

2000-10-18 Thread Rik Faith
On Wed 18 Oct 2000 09:43:43 -0700, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, John Levon wrote: I have only compile-tested the patch below with 2.4.0test10pre3 and 2.2.18pre16 (some fuzz on apply). Hope it's right, I can't test if it fixes the MODVERSIONS+in

Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work with modversions

2000-10-18 Thread Rik Faith
On Wed 18 Oct 2000 10:49:24 -0700, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: I have no idea what the get_module_symbol() code in question is trying to do, but this should be _fixed_ and not

Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work with modversions

2000-10-18 Thread Rik Faith
On Wed 18 Oct 2000 19:23:54 +0100, David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't you need to deal with the !CONFIG_AGP case correctly? This should already be dealt with in the Makefile -- if !CONFIG_AGP, then the file that we've been talking about (agpsupport.c) isn't compiled. (So, yes,

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [2.4.0test10-pre3]drm_proc_init incorrect when multiple device

2000-10-17 Thread Rik Faith
On Sun 15 Oct 2000 23:37:21 +0100, Tigran Aivazian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > or to write a "drmfs" (Al Viro's suggestion) or to abandon the original > > > design of not-sharing the code and do share it (my suggestion but of > > > course it's up

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [2.4.0test10-pre3]drm_proc_init incorrect when multiple device

2000-10-17 Thread Rik Faith
On Sun 15 Oct 2000 23:37:21 +0100, Tigran Aivazian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote: or to write a "drmfs" (Al Viro's suggestion) or to abandon the original design of not-sharing the code and do share it (my suggestion but of course it's up to Rick and