what are the issues of using procfs in place of ptrace?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
what are the issues of using procfs in place of ptrace?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Anyone with information regarding the programming of the Panasonic
CF-W7 embedded laptop controller?
Please?
Thank You in Advance
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Anyone with information regarding the programming of the Panasonic
CF-W7 embedded laptop controller?
Please?
Thank You in Advance
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
whats the difference between:
atomic_inc(>count);
and
spin_lock_irq(>lock);
++port->count;
spin_unlock_irq(>lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
whats the difference between:
atomic_inc(port-count);
and
spin_lock_irq(port-lock);
++port-count;
spin_unlock_irq(port-lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.
Date: Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:48 AM
Subject: direct firmware load failure with loadable kernel modules and
userspace firmware loader user helper fallback turned off
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Dec 3 10:18:02 (none
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.
Date: Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: mysterious udev segfault
To: Mathias Krause
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Mathias Krause wrote:
>
>
> Probably not. But I don't think the grsec patch changes
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rogelio M. Serrano Jr. rogelios...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: mysterious udev segfault
To: Mathias Krause mini...@googlemail.com
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Mathias Krause mini...@googlemail.com wrote:
snipped
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rogelio M. Serrano Jr. rogelios...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:48 AM
Subject: direct firmware load failure with loadable kernel modules and
userspace firmware loader user helper fallback turned off
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Dec
Mark Lord wrote:
> Why does link(2) not support hard-linking across bind mount points
> of the same underlying filesystem ?
do we need link(2) at all? bind mounts are supposed to be (hard/soft)
link minus the headaches.
--
Democracy is about two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for
Mark Lord wrote:
Why does link(2) not support hard-linking across bind mount points
of the same underlying filesystem ?
do we need link(2) at all? bind mounts are supposed to be (hard/soft)
link minus the headaches.
--
Democracy is about two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for dinner.
Ben Crowhurst wrote:
> Loïc Grenié wrote:
>> 2007/11/29, Ben Crowhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> Has Objective-C ever been considered for kernel development?
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> BPC
>>>
>>
I have tried it in a toy kernel. Oskit style. The code reuse is very
high specially with string ops
Ben Crowhurst wrote:
Loïc Grenié wrote:
2007/11/29, Ben Crowhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Has Objective-C ever been considered for kernel development?
regards,
BPC
I have tried it in a toy kernel. Oskit style. The code reuse is very
high specially with string ops and driver interfaces.
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>
>> The core libc and supporting libraries is the core. and the toolchain
>> the core dev. Those can be updated twice or even once a year. The kernel
>> can be updated once a month if you like.
>>
>
> A new release of the Linux kernel has more than half a million lines of
Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
>
>> But the good thing about open source software is that when you believe
>> your ideas are better than what current distributions do you can
>> implement your ideas and create your own distribution.
>>
>
> Haha, the typical FOSS advocate's fallacy. Quote:
>
> “You
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:51:25PM +, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
>
>> On 2007-11-12, Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I think a megafreeze development model is sane. Finding a collection
>>> of software versions that are all known to work together is
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:51:25PM +, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
On 2007-11-12, Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think a megafreeze development model is sane. Finding a collection
of software versions that are all known to work together is very
Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
But the good thing about open source software is that when you believe
your ideas are better than what current distributions do you can
implement your ideas and create your own distribution.
Haha, the typical FOSS advocate's fallacy. Quote:
“You have the
Adrian Bunk wrote:
The core libc and supporting libraries is the core. and the toolchain
the core dev. Those can be updated twice or even once a year. The kernel
can be updated once a month if you like.
A new release of the Linux kernel has more than half a million lines of
code
Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
>
> Allowing a user to tweak (under constraints) their settings might allow
> them to do something like create two mozilla profiles which are isolated
> from each other, so that the profile they use for general web surfing
> is isolated from the one they use for
Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
Allowing a user to tweak (under constraints) their settings might allow
them to do something like create two mozilla profiles which are isolated
from each other, so that the profile they use for general web surfing
is isolated from the one they use for online
i wrote a simple simulator for eevdf. im not sure if i got it right though.
how does eevdf track the runtime usage of a process?
is it supposed to be like this?
int
tick()
{
v_time += 1.0/sum_weights;
current->runtime += 1.0/current->weight;
//sched();
time++;
return 0;
}
i wrote a simple simulator for eevdf. im not sure if i got it right though.
how does eevdf track the runtime usage of a process?
is it supposed to be like this?
int
tick()
{
v_time += 1.0/sum_weights;
current->runtime += 1.0/current->weight;
//sched();
time++;
return 0;
}
i wrote a simple simulator for eevdf. im not sure if i got it right though.
how does eevdf track the runtime usage of a process?
is it supposed to be like this?
int
tick()
{
v_time += 1.0/sum_weights;
current-runtime += 1.0/current-weight;
//sched();
time++;
return 0;
}
i
i wrote a simple simulator for eevdf. im not sure if i got it right though.
how does eevdf track the runtime usage of a process?
is it supposed to be like this?
int
tick()
{
v_time += 1.0/sum_weights;
current-runtime += 1.0/current-weight;
//sched();
time++;
return 0;
}
i
26 matches
Mail list logo
