Re: [PATCH 00/11] writeback bug fixes and simplifications
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:08:40 +0100 Sascha Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >> I applied your patches to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, but now I am faced with one >> pdflush often using 100% CPU for a long time. There seem to be some rare >> pauses from its 100% usage, however. >> >> On ~23 minutes uptime i have ~19 minutes pdflush runtime. >> >> This is on E6600, x86_64, 2 Gig RAM, SATA HDD, running on gentoo ~x64_64 >> >> Let me know if you need more info. >> >> > > (some) cc's restored. Please, always do reply-to-all. > Hi Wu, Your latest patch does fix the seen pdflush 100% issue :) P.S.: Andrew, sorry my subject pretended I was subscribed to lkml, I am not. I hoped for the script at lkml to pull the threads together because of the subject. Thank you, Sascha Warner -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 00/11] writeback bug fixes and simplifications
Hi, I applied your patches to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, but now I am faced with one pdflush often using 100% CPU for a long time. There seem to be some rare pauses from its 100% usage, however. On ~23 minutes uptime i have ~19 minutes pdflush runtime. This is on E6600, x86_64, 2 Gig RAM, SATA HDD, running on gentoo ~x64_64 Let me know if you need more info. Prost, Sascha Warner -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 00/11] writeback bug fixes and simplifications
Hi, I applied your patches to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, but now I am faced with one pdflush often using 100% CPU for a long time. There seem to be some rare pauses from its 100% usage, however. On ~23 minutes uptime i have ~19 minutes pdflush runtime. This is on E6600, x86_64, 2 Gig RAM, SATA HDD, running on gentoo ~x64_64 Let me know if you need more info. Prost, Sascha Warner -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 00/11] writeback bug fixes and simplifications
Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:08:40 +0100 Sascha Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I applied your patches to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, but now I am faced with one pdflush often using 100% CPU for a long time. There seem to be some rare pauses from its 100% usage, however. On ~23 minutes uptime i have ~19 minutes pdflush runtime. This is on E6600, x86_64, 2 Gig RAM, SATA HDD, running on gentoo ~x64_64 Let me know if you need more info. (some) cc's restored. Please, always do reply-to-all. Hi Wu, Your latest patch does fix the seen pdflush 100% issue :) P.S.: Andrew, sorry my subject pretended I was subscribed to lkml, I am not. I hoped for the script at lkml to pull the threads together because of the subject. Thank you, Sascha Warner -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
