Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> I ran into a build error when I disabled CONFIG_ACPI and tried to
> compile this driver:
>
> drivers/perf/xgene_pmu.c:1242:1: warning: data definition has no type or
> storage class
>
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> I ran into a build error when I disabled CONFIG_ACPI and tried to
> compile this driver:
>
> drivers/perf/xgene_pmu.c:1242:1: warning: data definition has no type or
> storage class
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of,
My bad, I can reproduce the issue now.
Thanks
Tai
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Tai Tri Nguyen <ttngu...@apm.com> wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> I ran into a build error when I dis
My bad, I can reproduce the issue now.
Thanks
Tai
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> I ran into a build error when I disabled CONFIG_ACPI and tried to
>> compile this driver:
&
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> I ran into a build error when I disabled CONFIG_ACPI and tried to
> compile this driver:
I tried kernel 4.9 and couldn't reproduce the issue.
What is the kernel version you are seeing the compilation issue?
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> I ran into a build error when I disabled CONFIG_ACPI and tried to
> compile this driver:
I tried kernel 4.9 and couldn't reproduce the issue.
What is the kernel version you are seeing the compilation issue?
Regards
Tai
>
>
Hi Mark and Joe,
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:05:48AM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Tai Tri Nguyen <ttngu...@apm.com> wrote:
>> &
Hi Mark and Joe,
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:05:48AM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> > Hi Joe,
>> >
>> > On T
Hi Joe,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Tai Tri Nguyen <ttngu...@apm.com> wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 10:27 -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>>> This patch adds a driver for th
Hi Joe,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 10:27 -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>>> This patch adds a driver for the SoC-wide (AKA uncore) PMU hardware
>
Hi Joe,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 10:27 -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>> This patch adds a driver for the SoC-wide (AKA uncore) PMU hardware
>> found in APM X-Gene SoCs.
>
> trivia:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/perf/xgene_pmu.c
Hi Joe,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 10:27 -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>> This patch adds a driver for the SoC-wide (AKA uncore) PMU hardware
>> found in APM X-Gene SoCs.
>
> trivia:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/perf/xgene_pmu.c
Hi Will,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 6:16 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:05:40PM -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>> In addition to the X-Gene ARM CPU performance monitoring unit (PMU), there
>> are PMU for the SoC system devices such as L3 cache(s), I/O bridge(s),
Hi Will,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 6:16 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:05:40PM -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>> In addition to the X-Gene ARM CPU performance monitoring unit (PMU), there
>> are PMU for the SoC system devices such as L3 cache(s), I/O bridge(s),
>> memory controller
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your comments.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Tai Nguyen
>> ---
>> Documentation/perf/xgene-pmu.txt | 48 ++
>>
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your comments.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Tai Nguyen
>> ---
>> Documentation/perf/xgene-pmu.txt | 48 ++
>> drivers/perf/Kconfig |7 +
>>
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:39 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Please add some commit messge text, e.g.
>
> This patch adds a driver for the SoC-wide (AKA uncore) PMU hardware
> found in APM X-Gene SoCs.
>
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 05:07:24PM -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>>
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:39 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Please add some commit messge text, e.g.
>
> This patch adds a driver for the SoC-wide (AKA uncore) PMU hardware
> found in APM X-Gene SoCs.
>
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 05:07:24PM -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Tai
Hi Joe,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 17:35 -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi Joe,
>
> Chào Tai.
>
Thanks for the greeting!
>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wro
Hi Joe,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 17:35 -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi Joe,
>
> Chào Tai.
>
Thanks for the greeting!
>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2016-07-06
Hi Joe,
Thanks.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 17:07 -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Tai Nguyen
>> ---
>> MAINTAINERS | 8
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS
Hi Joe,
Thanks.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 17:07 -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Tai Nguyen
>> ---
>> MAINTAINERS | 8
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> []
>> @@ -8593,6
Hi Mark,
Thanks.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This looks mostly good now, though there are some remaining issues that
> I've commented on below.
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:50:44AM -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Tai Nguyen
Hi Mark,
Thanks.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This looks mostly good now, though there are some remaining issues that
> I've commented on below.
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:50:44AM -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Tai Nguyen
>> ---
>>
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 09:39:36AM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
>> > On T
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 09:39:36AM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 02:21:38PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 02:21:38PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 28/06/16 12:13, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:54:07AM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> >
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 02:21:38PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 28/06/16 12:13, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:54:07AM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jun 27,
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:54:20AM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 22,
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:54:20AM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:06:58AM -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>> >
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:06:58AM -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/perf/Kconfig b/drivers/perf/Kconfig
> > index 04e2653..be597dd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/perf/Kconfig
> > +++
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:06:58AM -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/perf/Kconfig b/drivers/perf/Kconfig
> > index 04e2653..be597dd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/perf/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/perf/Kconfig
> >
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the comments.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 06:24:51PM -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +#include
> >
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the comments.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 06:24:51PM -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +#include
>
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 06:25:56PM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>
> [...]
>
>> I'm facing a problem after removing the index for MCU and MC sub-nodes.
>> Th
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 06:25:56PM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>
> [...]
>
>> I'm facing a problem after removing the index for MCU and MC sub-nodes.
>> The MCUs and MCs aren't always enabl
Hi Mark,
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Tai Tri Nguyen <ttngu...@apm.com> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 02:46:05PM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>>> Hi Rob,
>>
Hi Mark,
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 02:46:05PM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:56 PM
Hi Will,
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 02:12:19PM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> It's been weeks.
>> I just want to ping again if you have any more comments on this patch set?
>
> We seem to have
Hi Will,
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 02:12:19PM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> It's been weeks.
>> I just want to ping again if you have any more comments on this patch set?
>
> We seem to have reached a stalemate whereby:
&
Hi Mark,
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 02:46:05PM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr
Hi Mark,
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 02:46:05PM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:31:22PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
&g
Hi all,
It's been weeks.
I just want to ping again if you have any more comments on this patch set?
Thanks,
Tai
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Tai Tri Nguyen <ttngu...@apm.com> wrote:
> Hi Rob/Mark,
>
> Do you have any more comments, please?
>
> Thanks,
> Tai
>
&g
Hi all,
It's been weeks.
I just want to ping again if you have any more comments on this patch set?
Thanks,
Tai
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Rob/Mark,
>
> Do you have any more comments, please?
>
> Thanks,
> Tai
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at
Hi Rob/Mark,
Do you have any more comments, please?
Thanks,
Tai
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Tai Tri Nguyen <ttngu...@apm.com> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:31:22PM +0100, Wi
Hi Rob/Mark,
Do you have any more comments, please?
Thanks,
Tai
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:31:22PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 18,
Hi Rob,
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:31:22PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:04:53PM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> > >> +Required properties for MCB subnode:
>>
Hi Rob,
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:31:22PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:04:53PM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> > >> +Required properties for MCB subnode:
>> > >> +- compatibl
Hi Mark and Rob,
[...]
>
> Regardless, I'll need an ack from Rob or Mark before I can merge this.
>
> Will
Do you have any more comments, please?
Thanks,
--
Tai
Hi Mark and Rob,
[...]
>
> Regardless, I'll need an ack from Rob or Mark before I can merge this.
>
> Will
Do you have any more comments, please?
Thanks,
--
Tai
Hi Rob,
[...]
>> +Required properties for MCB subnode:
>> +- compatible : Shall be "apm,xgene-pmu-mcb".
>> +- reg: First resource shall be the MCB PMU resource.
>> +- index : Instance number of the MCB PMU.
>> +
>> +Required properties for MC
Hi Rob,
[...]
>> +Required properties for MCB subnode:
>> +- compatible : Shall be "apm,xgene-pmu-mcb".
>> +- reg: First resource shall be the MCB PMU resource.
>> +- index : Instance number of the MCB PMU.
>> +
>> +Required properties for MC
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:50:10AM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:42:11
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:50:10AM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:42:11PM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> >> On Fri
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:51:02AM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
>> > On
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:51:02AM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:40:33PM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wr
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:40:33PM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 04:3
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:40:33PM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 04:37:50PM -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>> >> +This is A
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:42:11PM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
>> >> +static int get_next_avail_c
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:42:11PM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> >> +static int get_next_avail_cntr(struct xgene_pmu_dev *pmu_dev)
>> >> +{
&g
Hi Mark,
First of all, thanks for your comments.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't reviewed this in great detail, but I spotted a few issues.
>
>> +static int get_next_avail_cntr(struct xgene_pmu_dev *pmu_dev)
>> +{
>> + int shift,
Hi Mark,
First of all, thanks for your comments.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't reviewed this in great detail, but I spotted a few issues.
>
>> +static int get_next_avail_cntr(struct xgene_pmu_dev *pmu_dev)
>> +{
>> + int shift, cntr, retval;
>> +
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As per Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt, please
> put binding patches earlier in a series than the code using them.
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 04:37:50PM -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As per Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt, please
> put binding patches earlier in a series than the code using them.
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 04:37:50PM -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>> Documentation: Add
Hi Dann,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Dann Frazier wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi Dann,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Dann Frazier
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>>
Hi Dann,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Dann Frazier dann.fraz...@canonical.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Tai Tri Nguyen ttngu...@apm.com wrote:
Hi Dann,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Dann Frazier dann.fraz...@canonical.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Tai Nguyen
Hi Dann,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Dann Frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Tai Nguyen wrote:
>> This patch adds syscon poweroff device node to support poweroff feature
>> on APM X-Gene Mustang platform
>
> hey Tai,
> The reboot changes work just fine for me, but poweroff
Hi Dann,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Dann Frazier dann.fraz...@canonical.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Tai Nguyen ttngu...@apm.com wrote:
This patch adds syscon poweroff device node to support poweroff feature
on APM X-Gene Mustang platform
hey Tai,
The reboot changes work
Hello,
Any comment on these patches, please?
Thanks,
Tai
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Tai Nguyen wrote:
> This patch set adds syscon reboot/poweroff device nodes to support reboot and
> poweroff features on X-Gene platform.
>
> Tai Nguyen (2):
> power: reset: Add syscon reboot device
Hello,
Any comment on these patches, please?
Thanks,
Tai
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Tai Nguyen ttngu...@apm.com wrote:
This patch set adds syscon reboot/poweroff device nodes to support reboot and
poweroff features on X-Gene platform.
Tai Nguyen (2):
power: reset: Add syscon reboot
70 matches
Mail list logo