Re: 4.8.1 regression with cpufreq governors

2016-10-19 Thread Tim Walberg
This indeed turned out to be the fix. On 10/18/2016 23:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Monday, October 17, 2016 07:46:06 PM Tim Walberg wrote: >> > May or may not be related to similar reports, but here's what I've >> just observed >> > on m

Re: 4.8.1 regression with cpufreq governors

2016-10-19 Thread Tim Walberg
This indeed turned out to be the fix. On 10/18/2016 23:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Monday, October 17, 2016 07:46:06 PM Tim Walberg wrote: >> > May or may not be related to similar reports, but here's what I've >> just observed >> > on m

4.8.1 regression with cpufreq governors

2016-10-17 Thread Tim Walberg
May or may not be related to similar reports, but here's what I've just observed on my system. Built a stock kernel from tags/v4.8.1, relevant cpufreq bits: CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ATTR_SET=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_COMMON=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT=y

4.8.1 regression with cpufreq governors

2016-10-17 Thread Tim Walberg
May or may not be related to similar reports, but here's what I've just observed on my system. Built a stock kernel from tags/v4.8.1, relevant cpufreq bits: CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ATTR_SET=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_COMMON=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT=y

Re: A question about MMX.

2001-04-21 Thread Tim Walberg
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ End of included message -- +--+--+ | Tim Walberg | [EMAIL

Re: A question about MMX.

2001-04-21 Thread Tim Walberg
ed message -- +--+------+ | Tim Walberg | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | 828 Marshall Ct. | www.concentric.net/~twalberg | | Palatine

Re: kernel/sched.c questions

2001-04-04 Thread Tim Walberg
I know that goto's are better but finaly you are jumping to a function and >> then calling the function. I think you can improve performance doing this. This looks like a hand-optimization to avoid a branch in the most common case. Chances are a_condition is supposed to be pretty ra

Re: kernel/sched.c questions

2001-04-04 Thread Tim Walberg
usually include a branch for the usual code path, then. tw -- +--+--+ | Tim Walberg | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | 828 Marshall Ct. | www.concentric.net/~twalberg | | Palatine, IL 60074

Re: Bug report

2001-03-22 Thread Tim Walberg
510732 2884 0 1204 480948 >> -/+ buffers/cache: 28580 485036 >> Swap: 128480 40 128440 >> >> >> --- >> Craig Cummings, Ph.D. >> &

Re: Bug report

2001-03-22 Thread Tim Walberg
/lkml/ End of included message -- +--+----------+ | Tim Walberg | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | 828 Marshall Ct. | www.concentric.net/~twalberg | | Palatine, IL 60074 | | +--+--+ PGP signature

smartmedia adapter support??

2001-03-01 Thread Tim Walberg
to work real hard at it either, so I'm hoping someone can give me some pointers... TIA, tw -- +--+--+ | Tim Walberg | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | 828 Marshall Ct

smartmedia adapter support??

2001-03-01 Thread Tim Walberg
to work real hard at it either, so I'm hoping someone can give me some pointers... TIA, tw -- +--+--+ | Tim Walberg | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | 828 Marshall Ct

Re: ERR in /proc/interrupts

2001-01-18 Thread Tim Walberg
;> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ End of included message -- +--+--+ | Tim Walberg | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | 828 Marshall Ct. | www.concentric.net/~twalberg | | Palatine, IL 60074 | | +--+--+ PGP signature

Re: ERR in /proc/interrupts

2001-01-18 Thread Tim Walberg
. == - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ End of included message -- +--+------+ | Tim Walberg

Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue]

2000-11-10 Thread Tim Walberg
On 11/10/2000 16:30 -0300, Horst von Brand wrote: >> "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> > Horst von Brand wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> > > I've been using sendmail-8.11.1 (no encryption) to talk to MTAs all over >> >> > Turn on encryption, and try

Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue]

2000-11-10 Thread Tim Walberg
On 11/10/2000 16:30 -0300, Horst von Brand wrote: "Jeff V. Merkey" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Horst von Brand wrote: [...] I've been using sendmail-8.11.1 (no encryption) to talk to MTAs all over Turn on encryption, and try sending attachements