Andre,
Minor typo fix:
--- ide-dma.c.~1~ Tue Jun 5 14:39:06 2001
+++ ide-dma.c Tue Jun 5 15:04:54 2001
@@ -708,15 +708,15 @@
if ((!dma_base) && (!second_chance)) {
unsigned long set_bmiba = 0;
second_chance++;
- switch(dev->vender)
Andre,
Minor typo fix:
--- ide-dma.c.~1~ Tue Jun 5 14:39:06 2001
+++ ide-dma.c Tue Jun 5 15:04:54 2001
@@ -708,15 +708,15 @@
if ((!dma_base) (!second_chance)) {
unsigned long set_bmiba = 0;
second_chance++;
- switch(dev-vender) {
Matthias,
I tried 2.4.4 with the old aic7 driver and it worked fine.
I have no control over that stupid, stupid mime-sweeper message.
Thats our anal-retentive network administrators work
-- todd --
--
.~. Todd Roy, Senior Database Administrator .~.
/V\ Holstein
Matthias,
I tried pretty much the same thing, and I also tried your patch.
Unhappily when I access my zip drive using the aic7xxx driver my system
becomes pretty much unresposive, just short of locking up completely.
ie at least the emergency alt-sysrq keys still work.
I guess we'll just have
Matthias,
I tried pretty much the same thing, and I also tried your patch.
Unhappily when I access my zip drive using the aic7xxx driver my system
becomes pretty much unresposive, just short of locking up completely.
ie at least the emergency alt-sysrq keys still work.
I guess we'll just have
Matthias,
I tried 2.4.4 with the old aic7 driver and it worked fine.
I have no control over that stupid, stupid mime-sweeper message.
Thats our anal-retentive network administrators work
-- todd --
--
.~. Todd Roy, Senior Database Administrator .~.
/V\ Holstein
I get this when I try to compile 2.4.4-pre2
(I'm assuming the list is working this morning, since I've received no
messages).
Thanks.
-- todd --
$ make bzImage
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/var/src/linux-2.4.3/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
I get this when I try to compile 2.4.4-pre2
(I'm assuming the list is working this morning, since I've received no
messages).
Thanks.
-- todd --
$ make bzImage
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/var/src/linux-2.4.3/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
> From:Jonathan Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1
> x-no-productlinks: yes
> X-Newsgroups: fa.linux.kernel
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Date:Sat, 07 Apr 2001 21:01:56 GMT
> Bytes: 235
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
From:Jonathan Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1
x-no-productlinks: yes
X-Newsgroups: fa.linux.kernel
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Date:Sat, 07 Apr 2001 21:01:56 GMT
Bytes: 235
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
Wayne,
I have also been seeing disk corruption with my ASUS A7V with both
2.4.3-pre7 and pre8.
-- todd --
Hi,
I'm running kernel 2.4.3-pre8 on an ASUS A7V (BIOS 1007) motherboard and
recently noticed that it sometimes corrupts my hard disk, an IBM 75GXP
on
the onboard PDC20265 IDE
Wayne,
I have also been seeing disk corruption with my ASUS A7V with both
2.4.3-pre7 and pre8.
-- todd --
Hi,
I'm running kernel 2.4.3-pre8 on an ASUS A7V (BIOS 1007) motherboard and
recently noticed that it sometimes corrupts my hard disk, an IBM 75GXP
on
the onboard PDC20265 IDE
Hi All,
I notice that the new aic7xxx driver in 2.4.3-pre7 needs some version
of the berkeley db. (the make file has -ldb1 in it). It blew
up on my because I apparently don't have it installed.
.~. Todd Roy, Senior Database Administrator .~.
/V\ Holstein Association, U.S.A. Inc.
Hi All,
I notice that the new aic7xxx driver needs some version
of the berkekey db. (the make file has -ldb1 in it). It blew
up on my because I apparently don't have it installed.
--
.~. Todd Roy, Senior Database Administrator .~.
/V\ Holstein Association, U.S.A. Inc. /V\
Hi All,
I notice that the new aic7xxx driver needs some version
of the berkekey db. (the make file has -ldb1 in it). It blew
up on my because I apparently don't have it installed.
--
.~. Todd Roy, Senior Database Administrator .~.
/V\ Holstein Association, U.S.A. Inc. /V\
Hi All,
I notice that the new aic7xxx driver in 2.4.3-pre7 needs some version
of the berkeley db. (the make file has -ldb1 in it). It blew
up on my because I apparently don't have it installed.
.~. Todd Roy, Senior Database Administrator .~.
/V\ Holstein Association, U.S.A. Inc.
Andrea,
This worked for me on my home machine!!
Thank you!
-- todd --
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 05:32:34PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > BTW, I can easily reproduce. I was near to go into it yesterday but got
> > interrupted by other issues (like the merging
Andrea,
This worked for me on my home machine!!
Thank you!
-- todd --
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 05:32:34PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
BTW, I can easily reproduce. I was near to go into it yesterday but got
interrupted by other issues (like the merging of the
Andrea,
Sorry to say but lvm 0.9.1-beta1 still segfaults
at the same place, line 140 of pv_read_all_pv_of_vg.c
pv_this is still null.
This with a straight 2.4.0 kernel with an onstream tape
patch and the generated lvm patch. Lvm is a module (on
my home machine).
-- todd --
gdb
Andrea,
Sorry to say but lvm 0.9.1-beta1 still segfaults
at the same place, line 140 of pv_read_all_pv_of_vg.c
pv_this is still null.
This with a straight 2.4.0 kernel with an onstream tape
patch and the generated lvm patch. Lvm is a module (on
my home machine).
-- todd --
gdb
Alan and All,
I've detected a bug somewhere in 2.4.0-acX, at least in ac4,
the first ac kernel I built. It seems that I can't mount
a scsi zip disk in, unless the following has occurred:
1. There is a disk in the zip drive when I boot.
2. I fdisk the scsi block device and re-write the
Alan and All,
I've detected a bug somewhere in 2.4.0-acX, at least in ac4,
the first ac kernel I built. It seems that I can't mount
a scsi zip disk in, unless the following has occurred:
1. There is a disk in the zip drive when I boot.
2. I fdisk the scsi block device and re-write the
//e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc
>
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 04:29:19PM -0500, Todd M. Roy wrote:
> > group is visible, and you just told meit should be, then I can just
> > copy volumes over under test13-pre3 and destroy and recreate the
> > first volume group.
>
&g
//e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc
>
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 04:29:19PM -0500, Todd M. Roy wrote:
> > group is visible, and you just told meit should be, then I can just
> > copy volumes over under test13-pre3 and destroy and recreate the
> > first volume group.
>
&g
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 04:29:19PM -0500, Todd M. Roy wrote:
group is visible, and you just told meit should be, then I can just
copy volumes over under test13-pre3 and destroy and recreate the
first volume group.
Is it possible you had a snapshot in the volume group when you started
lvm
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 04:29:19PM -0500, Todd M. Roy wrote:
group is visible, and you just told meit should be, then I can just
copy volumes over under test13-pre3 and destroy and recreate the
first volume group.
Is it possible you had a snapshot in the volume group when you started
lvm
-pre3 and destroy and recreate the
first volume group.
Thanks,
-- todd --
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 02:24:39PM -0500, Todd M. Roy wrote:
>
>> Now that in 2.4.0-test12-pre4, lvm 0.9 has replaced 0.8, is it
possible
>> to do a conversion of lvm created physical volumes, volume groups
Now that in 2.4.0-test12-pre4, lvm 0.9 has replaced 0.8, is it possible
to do a conversion of lvm created physical volumes, volume groups
and logical volumes from 0.8 to 0.9?
Sorry if this is already a FAQ that I just haven't found yet.
-- todd --
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
-pre3 and destroy and recreate the
first volume group.
Thanks,
-- todd --
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 02:24:39PM -0500, Todd M. Roy wrote:
Now that in 2.4.0-test12-pre4, lvm 0.9 has replaced 0.8, is it
possible
to do a conversion of lvm created physical volumes, volume groups
and logical volumes
I got this oops dding partitions. test10-pre3
works fine.
below is a representative sample.
Thanks
-- todd --
root@pcx4168:~# fdisk -l /dev/hda
Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1216 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Device BootStart EndBlocks Id
I got this oops dding partitions. test10-pre3
works fine.
below is a representative sample.
Thanks
-- todd --
root@pcx4168:~# fdisk -l /dev/hda
Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1216 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Device BootStart EndBlocks Id
31 matches
Mail list logo
