Re: New system call wanted: fdreopen

2012-12-09 Thread Tristan Wibberley
On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 11:27:46 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 03:03:30PM +0000, Tristan Wibberley wrote: >> >> - /proc/self/fd/* does not solve this problem because the file might no ... > Actually, /proc/self/fd/* _will_ work. When you do a ls -

New system call wanted: fdreopen

2012-12-09 Thread Tristan Wibberley
solving this problem with otherwise unnecessary levels of either synchronisation or difficult to reproduce occasional bugs. -- Tristan Wibberley -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo i

New system call wanted: fdreopen

2012-12-09 Thread Tristan Wibberley
with otherwise unnecessary levels of either synchronisation or difficult to reproduce occasional bugs. -- Tristan Wibberley -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org

Re: New system call wanted: fdreopen

2012-12-09 Thread Tristan Wibberley
On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 11:27:46 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 03:03:30PM +, Tristan Wibberley wrote: - /proc/self/fd/* does not solve this problem because the file might no ... Actually, /proc/self/fd/* _will_ work. When you do a ls -l, it looks like a symlink

Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed

2005-02-15 Thread Tristan Wibberley
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 02:46:04 +, Tristan Wibberley wrote: > On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:54:14 +0100, Juergen Stuber wrote: > >> g BK, I can immediately start working on another SCM >> but I can't go back to BK immediately > > IMHO, it should be the other way around, and m

Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed

2005-02-15 Thread Tristan Wibberley
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 02:46:04 +, Tristan Wibberley wrote: On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:54:14 +0100, Juergen Stuber wrote: g BK, I can immediately start working on another SCM but I can't go back to BK immediately IMHO, it should be the other way around, and more like two years. Hmm, I

Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed

2005-02-14 Thread Tristan Wibberley
an SCM, and BitMover can get new users benefiting from their kindness and lifting their market penetration as easily as possible. -- Tristan Wibberley - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordo

Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed

2005-02-14 Thread Tristan Wibberley
, and BitMover can get new users benefiting from their kindness and lifting their market penetration as easily as possible. -- Tristan Wibberley - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http

Re: [patch, 2.6.11-rc2] sched: RLIMIT_RT_CPU_RATIO feature

2005-02-03 Thread Tristan Wibberley
be particularly hard to implement in O(1) :) Is it useful, too much work, over-engineered, logically impossible? -- Tristan Wibberley - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [patch, 2.6.11-rc2] sched: RLIMIT_RT_CPU_RATIO feature

2005-02-03 Thread Tristan Wibberley
could respond quickly to events without ever being able to cause or suffer from starvation. Unfortunately, O(1) behaviour would be a must, and that scheme could be particularly hard to implement in O(1) :) Is it useful, too much work, over-engineered, logically impossible? -- Tristan Wibberley