x27;m not sure if it's a correct
way to handle this situation, but after a short test looks like it
works - now I get multiple PDUs with maximum size of a 1514 bytes
(1500 MTU) and switch recognizes them now.
MRP protocol can have the same problem, but I can't test it.
Signed-Off-By: V
07.06.2013 17:33, Daniel Borkmann пишет:
On 06/07/2013 04:17 PM, Vitaly V. Bursov wrote:
07.06.2013 16:05, Daniel Borkmann пишет:
[...]
Ideas are welcome :)
Probably, that depends on _your scenario_ and/or BPF filter, but would it be
an alternative if you have only a few packet sockets
07.06.2013 16:05, Daniel Borkmann пишет:
On 06/07/2013 02:41 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
(CC's net-fu dojo)
On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 14:56 +0300, Vitaly V. Bursov wrote:
Hello,
I have a Linux router with a lot of interfaces (hundreds or
thousands of VLANs) and an application that cr
Hello,
I have a Linux router with a lot of interfaces (hundreds or
thousands of VLANs) and an application that creates AF_PACKET
socket per interface and bind()s sockets to interfaces.
Each socket has attached BPF filter too.
The problem is observed on linux-3.8.13, but as far I can see
from th
16.04.2013 06:03, Eric Dumazet пишет:
From: Eric Dumazet
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 17:37 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 16:57 +0300, Vitaly V. Bursov wrote:
Hello,
I have a bonding device (mode=802.3ad xmit_hash_policy=layer2+3 miimon=300) and
for kernels <3.7 forwarded I
Hello,
I have a bonding device (mode=802.3ad xmit_hash_policy=layer2+3 miimon=300) and
for kernels <3.7 forwarded IPv4 traffic distributed fine across multiple
physical
links. Ethernet cards are Intel 82576 with igb driver (various versions).
3.7 and 3.8 kernels tend to fully utilize only one l
6 matches
Mail list logo
