> On 22 Feb 2018, at 19:52, Mark Rustad wrote:
>
> Hardware-realized virtio-pci devices can implement SR-IOV, so this
> patch enables its use. The device in question is an upcoming Intel
> NIC that implements both a virtio-net PF and virtio-net VFs. These
> are
> On 22 Feb 2018, at 19:52, Mark Rustad wrote:
>
> Hardware-realized virtio-pci devices can implement SR-IOV, so this
> patch enables its use. The device in question is an upcoming Intel
> NIC that implements both a virtio-net PF and virtio-net VFs. These
> are hardware realizations of what
> On 20 Dec 2017, at 16:31, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:52:39AM -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/19/2017 04:19 AM, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 18 Dec 2017, at 18:04,
> On 20 Dec 2017, at 16:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:52:39AM -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/19/2017 04:19 AM, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 18 Dec 2017, at 18:04, Jason Baron via Qemu
> On 14 Dec 2017, at 21:33, Jason Baron via Qemu-devel
> wrote:
>
> Although they can be currently set in linux via 'ethtool -s', this requires
> guest changes, and thus it would be nice to extend this functionality such
> that it can be configured automatically from the
> On 14 Dec 2017, at 21:33, Jason Baron via Qemu-devel
> wrote:
>
> Although they can be currently set in linux via 'ethtool -s', this requires
> guest changes, and thus it would be nice to extend this functionality such
> that it can be configured automatically from the host (as other network
On Mar 17, 2014, at 8:43 AM, Ronen Hod wrote:
> On 03/13/2014 09:28 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 03/10/2014 04:03 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 01:28:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We used to stop the handling of tx when the number of pending DMAs
> exceeds
On Mar 17, 2014, at 8:43 AM, Ronen Hod r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/13/2014 09:28 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
On 03/10/2014 04:03 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 01:28:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
We used to stop the handling of tx when the number of pending DMAs
exceeds
On Apr 18, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:00:49PM +, Zhanghaoyu (A) wrote:
>> I start 10 VMs(windows xp), then running geekbench tool on them, about 2
>> days, one of them was reset,
>> I found the reset operation is done by
>> int
On Apr 18, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:00:49PM +, Zhanghaoyu (A) wrote:
I start 10 VMs(windows xp), then running geekbench tool on them, about 2
days, one of them was reset,
I found the reset operation is done by
int kvm_cpu_exec(CPUArchState *env)
On Aug 15, 2012, at 12:56 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> Do you consider allowing support for Windows as overengineering?
>>
>> I don't think there is a way to hook BSOD on Windows so attempting to
>> engineer something that works
On Aug 14, 2012, at 10:35 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti writes:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:53:01PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> Marcelo Tosatti writes:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:55:54PM +0300, Yan Vugenfirer wrote
On Aug 14, 2012, at 10:35 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:53:01PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:55:54PM +0300, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
On Aug 14, 2012
On Aug 15, 2012, at 12:56 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Do you consider allowing support for Windows as overengineering?
I don't think there is a way to hook BSOD on Windows so attempting to
engineer something that works with
On Aug 14, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-08-14 10:56, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 03:21:32PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:43:01AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
We can know the guest is panicked when the guest runs on xen.
On Aug 14, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-08-14 10:56, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 03:21:32PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:43:01AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
We can know the guest is panicked when the guest runs on xen.
But we
16 matches
Mail list logo