On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:34:00PM +, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Hi Liviu, Rob,
Hi Alexey,
>
> On Fri, 2017-03-03 at 18:21 +, liviu.du...@arm.com wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 05:48:19PM +, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Liviu,
> > >
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:34:00PM +, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Hi Liviu, Rob,
Hi Alexey,
>
> On Fri, 2017-03-03 at 18:21 +, liviu.du...@arm.com wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 05:48:19PM +, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Liviu,
> > >
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 05:48:19PM +, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Hi Liviu,
>
> On Fri, 2017-03-03 at 16:28 +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 06:19:24PM +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > >
> > > - /* find the encoder node and initialize it */
> > > - encoder_node =
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 05:48:19PM +, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Hi Liviu,
>
> On Fri, 2017-03-03 at 16:28 +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 06:19:24PM +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > >
> > > - /* find the encoder node and initialize it */
> > > - encoder_node =
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 08:26:42AM +, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Hi Liviu
>
[snip]
> > > >
> > > > Your idea is a good one, however you are abusing PCIBIOS_MIN_IO and
> > you
> > > > actually need another variable for "reserving" an area in the I/O
> > space
> > > > that can be used for
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 08:26:42AM +, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Hi Liviu
>
[snip]
> > > >
> > > > Your idea is a good one, however you are abusing PCIBIOS_MIN_IO and
> > you
> > > > actually need another variable for "reserving" an area in the I/O
> > space
> > > > that can be used for
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 03:53:53PM +, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Hi Liviu
Hi Gabriele,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: liviu.du...@arm.com [mailto:liviu.du...@arm.com]
> > Sent: 11 November 2016 14:46
> > To: Gabriele Paoloni
> &
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 03:53:53PM +, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Hi Liviu
Hi Gabriele,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: liviu.du...@arm.com [mailto:liviu.du...@arm.com]
> > Sent: 11 November 2016 14:46
> > To: Gabriele Paoloni
> &
mail.com;
> > robh...@kernel.org; kant...@163.com; linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org;
> > catalin.mari...@arm.com; o...@lixom.net; liviu.du...@arm.com;
> > bhelgaas@googl e.com; zhichang.yua...@gmail.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] ARM64 LPC: LPC driver implementation on
>
mail.com;
> > robh...@kernel.org; kant...@163.com; linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org;
> > catalin.mari...@arm.com; o...@lixom.net; liviu.du...@arm.com;
> > bhelgaas@googl e.com; zhichang.yua...@gmail.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] ARM64 LPC: LPC driver implementation on
>
Hi Arnd,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 05:07:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:36:49 PM CET Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> >
> > Where should we get the range from? For LPC we know that it is going
> > Work on anything that is not used by PCI I/O space, and this is
> >
Hi Arnd,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 05:07:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:36:49 PM CET Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> >
> > Where should we get the range from? For LPC we know that it is going
> > Work on anything that is not used by PCI I/O space, and this is
> >
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 04:06:40PM +, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Hi Liviu
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: liviu.du...@arm.com [mailto:liviu.du...@arm.com]
> > Sent: 09 November 2016 16:51
> > To: Gabriele Paoloni
> > Cc: Yuanzhichang; catalin.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 04:06:40PM +, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Hi Liviu
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: liviu.du...@arm.com [mailto:liviu.du...@arm.com]
> > Sent: 09 November 2016 16:51
> > To: Gabriele Paoloni
> > Cc: Yuanzhichang; catalin.
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 04:16:17PM +, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Hi Liviu
>
> Thanks for reviewing
>
[removed some irrelevant part of discussion, avoid crazy formatting]
> > > +/**
> > > + * addr_is_indirect_io - check whether the input taddr is for
> > indirectIO.
> > > + * @taddr: the io
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 04:16:17PM +, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Hi Liviu
>
> Thanks for reviewing
>
[removed some irrelevant part of discussion, avoid crazy formatting]
> > > +/**
> > > + * addr_is_indirect_io - check whether the input taddr is for
> > indirectIO.
> > > + * @taddr: the io
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 05:28:47PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 3:16:21 PM CEST Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> >
> > > This has neither the PCI memory nor the I/O resource, it looks like you
> > > never
> > > call pci_add_resource_offset() to start with, or maybe it
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 05:28:47PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 3:16:21 PM CEST Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> >
> > > This has neither the PCI memory nor the I/O resource, it looks like you
> > > never
> > > call pci_add_resource_offset() to start with, or maybe it
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 08:11:56AM +, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > Subject: Re: Purpose of pci_remap_iospace
> >
> > On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 6:57:10 AM CEST Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a query.
> > >
> > > Can any once explain the purpose of pci_remap_iospace
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 08:11:56AM +, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > Subject: Re: Purpose of pci_remap_iospace
> >
> > On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 6:57:10 AM CEST Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a query.
> > >
> > > Can any once explain the purpose of pci_remap_iospace
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:26:33AM +, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> Hi Liviu, Arnd,
>
> On 11 November 2015 18:25, LIviu wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:32:13PM +, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> > > Hi Liviu, Will,
> > >
> > > On 04 November 2015 15:19, Phil wrote:
> > > > On 04 November 2015
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:26:33AM +, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> Hi Liviu, Arnd,
>
> On 11 November 2015 18:25, LIviu wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:32:13PM +, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> > > Hi Liviu, Will,
> > >
> > > On 04 November 2015 15:19, Phil wrote:
> > > > On 04 November 2015
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:32:13PM +, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> Hi Liviu, Will,
>
> On 04 November 2015 15:19, Phil wrote:
> > On 04 November 2015 15:02, Liviu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 02:48:38PM +, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> > > > Hi Liviu,
> > > >
> > > > On 04 November 2015 14:24,
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:32:13PM +, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> Hi Liviu, Will,
>
> On 04 November 2015 15:19, Phil wrote:
> > On 04 November 2015 15:02, Liviu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 02:48:38PM +, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> > > > Hi Liviu,
> > > >
> > > > On 04 November 2015 14:24,
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 02:48:38PM +, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> Hi Liviu,
>
> On 04 November 2015 14:24, Liviu wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 01:57:48PM +, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am trying to hook up a PCIe host controller that sits behind an IOMMU,
> > > but having
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 01:57:48PM +, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to hook up a PCIe host controller that sits behind an IOMMU,
> but having some problems.
>
> I'm using the pcie-rcar PCIe host controller and it works fine without
> the IOMMU, and I can attach the IOMMU to the
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 02:48:38PM +, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> Hi Liviu,
>
> On 04 November 2015 14:24, Liviu wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 01:57:48PM +, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am trying to hook up a PCIe host controller that sits behind an IOMMU,
> > > but having
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 01:57:48PM +, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to hook up a PCIe host controller that sits behind an IOMMU,
> but having some problems.
>
> I'm using the pcie-rcar PCIe host controller and it works fine without
> the IOMMU, and I can attach the IOMMU to the
28 matches
Mail list logo
