Re: Dying disk and filesystem choice.

Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > No, reiserfs does have badblock support > > You just have to get it as a separate patch from us because it was written after > code freeze. > > Hans > It might be nice to have a link to that patch from the "download" page. I didn't see that

Re: Dying disk and filesystem choice.

Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, May 24 2001, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 12:58:14AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > > Well reiserfs is probably a very bad choice at this point. It > > > does not have any bad blocks support (yet), so as soon as you have > > >

Re: Dying disk and filesystem choice.

Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, May 24 2001, Andi Kleen wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 12:58:14AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: Well reiserfs is probably a very bad choice at this point. It does not have any bad blocks support (yet), so as soon as you have a bad block

Re: Dying disk and filesystem choice.

Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No, reiserfs does have badblock support You just have to get it as a separate patch from us because it was written after code freeze. Hans It might be nice to have a link to that patch from the download page. I didn't see that patch the

Dying disk and filesystem choice.

Hi, Could I please be CC'd replies. To keep it short and sweet, I have a 45Gb IBM drive that is slowly dying by getting more bad sectors. I have already returned my first one to get the current disk, so would like to use the current one for a while before returning it for another disk that

Dying disk and filesystem choice.

Hi, Could I please be CC'd replies. To keep it short and sweet, I have a 45Gb IBM drive that is slowly dying by getting more bad sectors. I have already returned my first one to get the current disk, so would like to use the current one for a while before returning it for another disk that

idebus=xx on a ISA only 486

Hi, This may be harmless but I noticed a warning msg when I went to 2.4.3 on a ISA only 486 mobo. Feb 18 18:01:41 speedy kernel: ide: Assuming 50MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx My first thought was to drop idebus to 8Mhz (I think this is the ISA speed ?), but

idebus=xx on a ISA only 486

Hi, This may be harmless but I noticed a warning msg when I went to 2.4.3 on a ISA only 486 mobo. Feb 18 18:01:41 speedy kernel: ide: Assuming 50MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx My first thought was to drop idebus to 8Mhz (I think this is the ISA speed ?), but