Hello Javier,
On Saturday 25 February 2017 01:12 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Pankaj,
>
> On 12/16/2016 08:48 AM, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> From: Smitha T Murthy
>>
>> It has been observed on ARM64 based Exynos SoC, if IOMMU is not enabled
>> and we try to use reserved memory for MFC
s series is superseded by patch [1] after
review comments and suggestion from Marek. Patch [1] has been accepted
and merged and working well for us.
[1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9482499/
Thanks,
Pankaj Dubey
>> Signed-off-by: Smitha T Murthy
>> [pankaj.dubey: debugging is
Hi Kishon,
On Thursday 12 January 2017 03:13 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Add COMPILE_TEST to all designware based drivers so that it is possible
> to perform compile test even when a particular architecture specific
> config symbol is not set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I
>
Hello Jingoo, Bjorn,
On Thursday 05 January 2017 09:47 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> On 01/05/2017 12:53 PM, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> From: Niyas Ahmed S T
>>
>> Currently Exynos PCIe driver is only supported for Exynos5440 SoC.
>> This patch does refactoring of Exynos PCIe driver to extend support
>>
Hi Javier,
On Wednesday 18 January 2017 09:06 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 01/18/2017 04:04 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi Pankaj,
>>
>> This issue already posted by Javier Martinez Canillas[1].
>> Maybe, he will post v2.
>>
>
> That's correct, I didn't post a v2 since I wa
Hi Krzysztof,
On Tuesday 10 January 2017 11:55 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 06:09:40PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> BTW What is interesting is that the Exynos7 dts patch [2] has never
>> made it into upstream for some reason. In the meantime however
>> Ex
Hi Jaehoon,
On Wednesday 04 January 2017 06:04 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> This patch is for using PHY generic framework.
> To maintain backward compatibility, check whether phy is supported or
> not with 'using_phy'.
>
> And if someone use the old dt-file, display the "deprecated" message.
> But
Hi Jaehoon,
On Wednesday 04 January 2017 06:04 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Add phy-pcie node for using Exynos5440 pcie.
> And use the reg-names as "elbi" and "config".
> Because the getting configuratioin space address from ranges is old way.
> It also is helpful to distinguish more clearly.
>
> S
Hi Jaehoon,
On Wednesday 04 January 2017 06:04 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> According to using PHY framework, updates the exynos5440-pcie binding.
> For maintaining backward compatibility, leaves the current dt-binding.
> (It should be deprecated.)
>
> Recommends to use the Phy Framework and "confi
Hi Jaehoon,
On Wednesday 04 January 2017 06:04 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> This patch supports to use Generic Phy framework for Exynos PCIe phy.
> When Exynos that supported the pcie want to use the PCIe,
> it needs to control the phy resgister.
> But it should be more complex to control in their o
Hi,
On Thursday 05 January 2017 09:46 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon,
>
> On 01/04/2017 06:04 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> Adds the exynos-pcie-phy binding for Exynos PCIe PHY.
>> This is for using generic PHY framework.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung
>> ---
>> Changelog on V2:
>> - Remo
Hi Jaehoon,
On Monday 19 December 2016 01:47 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Removed the duplicated codes.
> It can use the more simply than now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c | 22 --
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
Hi Jaehoon,
On Monday 19 December 2016 01:47 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Just use the bitops api to operate the bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c | 24
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Pankaj D
Hi Jaehoon,
On Monday 19 December 2016 01:47 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Remove the unnecessary variables(elbi/phy/block_base).
> It needs one resource structure for assigning each resource.
> So it replaces with one 'res' variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-e
Hi Jaehoon,
On Monday 19 December 2016 01:47 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> There is no reason to maintain *_blk/phy/elbi_* as register accessors.
> It can be replaced to one register accessor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung
> ---
Looks fine. Nice cleanup :)
Reviewed-by: Pankaj Dubey
Hi Marek,
On Tuesday 20 December 2016 05:28 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Pankaj
>
>
> On 2016-12-16 12:48, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> It has been observed on ARM64 based Exynos SoC, if IOMMU is not enabled
>> and we try to use reserved memory for MFC, reqbufs fails with below
>> mentioned error
On Thursday 17 November 2016 10:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday, November 17, 2016 9:50:27 AM CET pankaj.dubey wrote:
>>
>>>>> of_scu_enable() which _only_ looks up the SCU address in DT and enables
>>>>> it if it finds it, otherwise returning fai
rnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>> On Monday, November 14, 2016 2:10:16 PM CET pankaj.dubey wrote:
>>>>>>> +scu_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>>>>>>> +of_node_put(np);
>>>>>>> +if (!scu_base) {
>>>>>>> +
Hi Shawn,
On Monday 14 November 2016 07:56 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:32:07AM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> Now as we have of_scu_enable which takes care of mapping
>> scu base from DT, lets use it.
>>
>> At the same time this patch cleans up mach-imx platform files by
>> re
Hi Russell,
On Monday 14 November 2016 07:18 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> This should be sent _to_ me because it's touching generic ARM code.
> Thanks.
>
Sorry for this.
I had included your email in CC for this patch, but looks like my email
client had some issue and this patch could n
Hi Krzysztof,
On Wednesday 16 November 2016 12:29 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:31:57AM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> Now as we have of_scu_enable which takes care of mapping
>> scu base from DT, lets use it.
>>
>> This patch also fixes build failure in case !SMP caus
Hi Sudeep,
On Wednesday 16 November 2016 08:04 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 14/11/16 05:02, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> Now as we have of_scu_enable which takes care of mapping
>> scu base from DT, lets use it.
>>
>> CC: Liviu Dudau
>> CC: Sudeep Holla
>
> I assume you will take this series th
On Monday 14 November 2016 05:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, November 14, 2016 10:31:59 AM CET Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> static const struct of_device_id realview_scu_match[] = {
>> { .compatible = "arm,arm11mp-scu", },
>> - { .compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-scu", },
>> -
Hi Jisheng,
On Monday 14 November 2016 12:24 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:12:51 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>
>> Hi Pankaj,
>>
>>> + * Helper API to get SCU base address
>>> + * In case platform DT do not have SCU node, or iomap fails
>>> + * this call will fallback and
Hi Jisheng,
On Monday 14 November 2016 11:42 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Hi Pankaj,
>
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:31:56 +0530 Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> +
>> +np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, scu_match);
>
> could we check np before calling of_iomap()?
>
of_iomap takes care of that, and will r
Hi Alim,
On Tuesday 05 July 2016 02:22 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>
>
> On 07/05/2016 01:46 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 07/04/2016 01:03 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>>> As per code flow it is possible that s3c_rtc_setfreq() might get called
>>> with rtc clock disabled and in set_freq we perform
Hi Alim,
On Tuesday 05 July 2016 02:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/05/2016 10:52 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/05/2016 01:46 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 07/04/2016 01:03 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
As per code flow it is possible that s3c_rtc_setfreq() might get called
Hi Javier,
On Thursday 26 May 2016 01:15 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> [adding Kevin and Sjoerd who also noticed issues with this patch]
>
> Hi Pankaj,
>
> On 05/25/2016 11:43 PM, pankaj.dubey wrote:
>> Hi Javier,
>>
>> On Wednesday 25 May 2016 08:32 P
Hi Javier,
On Wednesday 25 May 2016 08:32 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Pankaj,
>
> On 05/25/2016 04:33 AM, pankaj.dubey wrote:
>> Hi Javier,
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
>>
>> Just noticed that, current krzk/for-
Hi Javier,
On Friday 29 April 2016 12:51 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The MFC nodes with the memory regions reserved for memory allocations
> are missing in the Exynos5420 Peach Pit and Exynos5800 Peach Pi DTS.
>
> This causes the s5p-mfc driver probe to fail with the following error:
>
On Saturday 05 March 2016 11:48 AM, pankaj.dubey wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wednesday 02 March 2016 11:23 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 02:03:37PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>>> This patch adds exynos-srom binding information for SROM Controller
>>>
Hi
On Wednesday 02 March 2016 11:23 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 02:03:37PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> This patch adds exynos-srom binding information for SROM Controller
>> driver on Exynos SoCs.
>>
>> CC: Rob Herring
>> CC: Mark Rutland
>> CC: Ian Campbell
>> CC: device
Hi,
On Wednesday 02 March 2016 11:27 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 02:03:41PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> From: Pavel Fedin
>>
>> Add documentation for new subnode properties, allowing bank configuration.
>> Based on u-boot implementation, but heavily reworked.
>>
>> Also, fi
Hi,
On Wednesday 02 March 2016 11:23 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 02:03:37PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> This patch adds exynos-srom binding information for SROM Controller
>> driver on Exynos SoCs.
>>
>> CC: Rob Herring
>> CC: Mark Rutland
>> CC: Ian Campbell
>> CC: devic
Hi Krzysztof,
On Thursday 25 February 2016 06:13 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 25.02.2016 07:22, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 09:34:02AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Hi Arnd, Kevin and Olof,
>>>
>>> This finally moves SROM controller and PMU code to separate
>>>
Hi Krzysztof,
On Thursday 25 February 2016 09:36 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 25.02.2016 12:27, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> From: Alim Akhtar
>>
>> This patch adds tmu node, related temprature sensor and triping
>> point data for Atlas cpu core found on exynos7 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alim Ak
Hi Krzysztof,
On Friday 18 December 2015 09:57 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18.12.2015 12:32, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> In this series I am splitting up SoC specific PMU configuration data into
>> mach-exynos folder itself, before moving all of them under
>> drivers/soc/samsung/. Also instead
Hi Krzysztof,
On Thursday 17 December 2015 11:01 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17.11.2015 15:05, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> In this series I am splitting up SoC specific PMU configuration data into
>> mach-exynos folder itself, before moving all of them under
>> drivers/soc/samsung/. Also instea
Hi Krzysztof,
On Thursday 17 December 2015 10:44 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12.12.2015 16:43, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> THIS IS A RESEND OF ONCE MERGED INTO kgene/for-next AND LOST PATCHES
>>
>> Series v5 got merged in kgene/for-next but due to last moment change before
>> pull
>> these pat
Hi Kukjin
On Friday 23 October 2015 11:48 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 10/23/15 18:49, Pavel Fedin wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
This patchset, I have tested on Peach-Pi (Exynos5880) based chromebook for
boot
and S2R functionality.
>>>
>>> Entire patchset tested on Trats2 (Exynos4412) bo
On Monday 16 November 2015 07:06 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Currently the Exynos5433 (ARMv8 SoC) clock driver depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
> so it is built also on ARMv7. This does not bring any kind of benefit.
> There won't be a single kernel image for ARMv7 and ARMv8 SoCs (like
> multi_v7 for
On Monday 16 November 2015 07:06 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The ARMv8 Exynos family SoCs in Linux kernel are currently:
> - Exynos5433 (controlled by ARCH_EXYNOS),
> - Exynos7 (controlled by ARCH_EXYNOS7).
>
> It duplicates Kconfig symbols unnecessarily, so consolidate them into
> one AR
On Saturday 14 November 2015 05:00 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
W dniu 14.11.2015 o 00:36, Pankaj Dubey pisze:
On 13 November 2015 at 15:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
On 13.11.2015 18:29, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
This patch moves Exynos PMU driver implementation from "arm/mach-exynos"
to "dr
43 matches
Mail list logo