Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: reinit of completion variable

2016-11-21 Thread prahlad venkata
Did anybody got chance to review this patch? I feel this is a trivial yet required fix. On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Prahlad V wrote: > > completion variable should be reinitialized before reusing. > > Signed-off-by: Prahlad V > --- >

Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: reinit of completion variable

2016-11-21 Thread prahlad venkata
Did anybody got chance to review this patch? I feel this is a trivial yet required fix. On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Prahlad V wrote: > > completion variable should be reinitialized before reusing. > > Signed-off-by: Prahlad V > --- > drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1

Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: clear wlen field while setting word length.

2016-07-11 Thread prahlad venkata
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> wrote: > > > On Monday 11 July 2016 02:49 PM, prahlad venkata wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> wrote: > [...] >>>>>>>>> diff --gi

Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: clear wlen field while setting word length.

2016-07-11 Thread prahlad venkata
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Vignesh R wrote: > > > On Monday 11 July 2016 02:49 PM, prahlad venkata wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Vignesh R wrote: > [...] >>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ti-q

Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: clear wlen field while setting word length.

2016-07-11 Thread prahlad venkata
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> wrote: > > > On Monday 11 July 2016 02:39 PM, prahlad venkata wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:36 PM, prahlad venkata <prahlad@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at

Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: clear wlen field while setting word length.

2016-07-11 Thread prahlad venkata
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Vignesh R wrote: > > > On Monday 11 July 2016 02:39 PM, prahlad venkata wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:36 PM, prahlad venkata >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Vignesh R wrote: >>>> >>>>

Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: clear wlen field while setting word length.

2016-07-11 Thread prahlad venkata
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:36 PM, prahlad venkata <prahlad@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Monday 11 July 2016 01:34 PM, prahlad venkata wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM,

Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: clear wlen field while setting word length.

2016-07-11 Thread prahlad venkata
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:36 PM, prahlad venkata wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Vignesh R wrote: >> >> >> On Monday 11 July 2016 01:34 PM, prahlad venkata wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Vignesh R wrote: >>>> Hi Prahlad, >>

Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: clear wlen field while setting word length.

2016-07-11 Thread prahlad venkata
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> wrote: > > > On Monday 11 July 2016 01:34 PM, prahlad venkata wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> wrote: >>> Hi Prahlad, >>> >>> On Sunday 10

Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: clear wlen field while setting word length.

2016-07-11 Thread prahlad venkata
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Vignesh R wrote: > > > On Monday 11 July 2016 01:34 PM, prahlad venkata wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Vignesh R wrote: >>> Hi Prahlad, >>> >>> On Sunday 10 July 2016 01:35 AM, Prahlad V wrote: >

Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: clear wlen field while setting word length.

2016-07-11 Thread prahlad venkata
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Vignesh R wrote: > Hi Prahlad, > > On Sunday 10 July 2016 01:35 AM, Prahlad V wrote: >> When a word length of 1 byte is selected and writing data of length >> more than QSPI_WLEN_MAX_BYTES, first MAX_BYTES will be transfered >> and remaining will

Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: clear wlen field while setting word length.

2016-07-11 Thread prahlad venkata
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Vignesh R wrote: > Hi Prahlad, > > On Sunday 10 July 2016 01:35 AM, Prahlad V wrote: >> When a word length of 1 byte is selected and writing data of length >> more than QSPI_WLEN_MAX_BYTES, first MAX_BYTES will be transfered >> and remaining will be transfered