Did anybody got chance to review this patch?
I feel this is a trivial yet required fix.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Prahlad V wrote:
>
> completion variable should be reinitialized before reusing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Prahlad V
> ---
>
Did anybody got chance to review this patch?
I feel this is a trivial yet required fix.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Prahlad V wrote:
>
> completion variable should be reinitialized before reusing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Prahlad V
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 11 July 2016 02:49 PM, prahlad venkata wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> wrote:
> [...]
>>>>>>>>> diff --gi
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 11 July 2016 02:49 PM, prahlad venkata wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
> [...]
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ti-q
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 11 July 2016 02:39 PM, prahlad venkata wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:36 PM, prahlad venkata <prahlad@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 11 July 2016 02:39 PM, prahlad venkata wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:36 PM, prahlad venkata
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:36 PM, prahlad venkata <prahlad@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Monday 11 July 2016 01:34 PM, prahlad venkata wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:36 PM, prahlad venkata wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Monday 11 July 2016 01:34 PM, prahlad venkata wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
>>>> Hi Prahlad,
>>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 11 July 2016 01:34 PM, prahlad venkata wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Prahlad,
>>>
>>> On Sunday 10
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 11 July 2016 01:34 PM, prahlad venkata wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
>>> Hi Prahlad,
>>>
>>> On Sunday 10 July 2016 01:35 AM, Prahlad V wrote:
>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
> Hi Prahlad,
>
> On Sunday 10 July 2016 01:35 AM, Prahlad V wrote:
>> When a word length of 1 byte is selected and writing data of length
>> more than QSPI_WLEN_MAX_BYTES, first MAX_BYTES will be transfered
>> and remaining will
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
> Hi Prahlad,
>
> On Sunday 10 July 2016 01:35 AM, Prahlad V wrote:
>> When a word length of 1 byte is selected and writing data of length
>> more than QSPI_WLEN_MAX_BYTES, first MAX_BYTES will be transfered
>> and remaining will be transfered
12 matches
Mail list logo