Viresh Kumar wrote:
>On 4 April 2013 12:17, stratosk wrote:
>> Why do you suspect significant increased power? With ondemand the CPU will
>> go down to lowest freq as soon as the load will decreased. And the
>> measurement shows that the CPU load will decrease fast
Hi Viresh,
I never use performance governor, but I want improved performance with ondemand.
Why do you suspect significant increased power? With ondemand the CPU will go
down to lowest freq as soon as the load will decreased. And the measurement
shows that the CPU load will decrease faster
Hi Viresh,
I never use performance governor, but I want improved performance with ondemand.
Why do you suspect significant increased power? With ondemand the CPU will go
down to lowest freq as soon as the load will decreased. And the measurement
shows that the CPU load will decrease faster
Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 4 April 2013 12:17, stratosk strat...@semaphore.gr wrote:
Why do you suspect significant increased power? With ondemand the CPU will
go down to lowest freq as soon as the load will decreased. And the
measurement shows that the CPU load
I'm sorry, I don't understand.
The goal of this patch is not energy saving.
The goal is to detect CPU load as soon as possible to increase frequency.
Could you please clarify this?
Thanks,
Stratos
"Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
>On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 06:49:14 PM Stratos Karafotis wrote:
>>
I'm sorry, I don't understand.
The goal of this patch is not energy saving.
The goal is to detect CPU load as soon as possible to increase frequency.
Could you please clarify this?
Thanks,
Stratos
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 06:49:14 PM Stratos Karafotis
6 matches
Mail list logo
