On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 01:36:09PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >This patch kills include/linux/eeprom.h .
> >
> >Rationale:
> >- it's only used by one single driver
> >- most of this file are non-inline and non-static functions (sic)
> >
> >This patch moves all required
I agree eeprom is memory technology at the least there should be
secondary links for a static or symlinked file that leaves PCI/AT boot
devices, future PLOS open to development.
Nick
I would rather update other drivers to use it :)
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch kills include/linux/eeprom.h .
Rationale:
- it's only used by one single driver
- most of this file are non-inline and non-static functions (sic)
This patch moves all required contents of this file into ns83820.c and
removes include/linux/eeprom.h (and makes
This patch kills include/linux/eeprom.h .
Rationale:
- it's only used by one single driver
- most of this file are non-inline and non-static functions (sic)
This patch moves all required contents of this file into ns83820.c and
removes include/linux/eeprom.h (and makes setup_ee_mem_bitbanger
This patch kills include/linux/eeprom.h .
Rationale:
- it's only used by one single driver
- most of this file are non-inline and non-static functions (sic)
This patch moves all required contents of this file into ns83820.c and
removes include/linux/eeprom.h (and makes setup_ee_mem_bitbanger
Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch kills include/linux/eeprom.h .
Rationale:
- it's only used by one single driver
- most of this file are non-inline and non-static functions (sic)
This patch moves all required contents of this file into ns83820.c and
removes include/linux/eeprom.h (and makes
I agree eeprom is memory technology at the least there should be
secondary links for a static or symlinked file that leaves PCI/AT boot
devices, future PLOS open to development.
Nick
I would rather update other drivers to use it :)
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 01:36:09PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch kills include/linux/eeprom.h .
Rationale:
- it's only used by one single driver
- most of this file are non-inline and non-static functions (sic)
This patch moves all required contents of this file
8 matches
Mail list logo