Re: [2.6 patch] kill include/linux/eeprom.h

2005-02-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 01:36:09PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > >This patch kills include/linux/eeprom.h . > > > >Rationale: > >- it's only used by one single driver > >- most of this file are non-inline and non-static functions (sic) > > > >This patch moves all required

Re: [2.6 patch] kill include/linux/eeprom.h

2005-02-17 Thread Nick Winlund
I agree eeprom is memory technology at the least there should be secondary links for a static or symlinked file that leaves PCI/AT boot devices, future PLOS open to development. Nick I would rather update other drivers to use it :) Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [2.6 patch] kill include/linux/eeprom.h

2005-02-17 Thread Jeff Garzik
Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch kills include/linux/eeprom.h . Rationale: - it's only used by one single driver - most of this file are non-inline and non-static functions (sic) This patch moves all required contents of this file into ns83820.c and removes include/linux/eeprom.h (and makes

[2.6 patch] kill include/linux/eeprom.h

2005-02-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch kills include/linux/eeprom.h . Rationale: - it's only used by one single driver - most of this file are non-inline and non-static functions (sic) This patch moves all required contents of this file into ns83820.c and removes include/linux/eeprom.h (and makes setup_ee_mem_bitbanger

[2.6 patch] kill include/linux/eeprom.h

2005-02-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch kills include/linux/eeprom.h . Rationale: - it's only used by one single driver - most of this file are non-inline and non-static functions (sic) This patch moves all required contents of this file into ns83820.c and removes include/linux/eeprom.h (and makes setup_ee_mem_bitbanger

Re: [2.6 patch] kill include/linux/eeprom.h

2005-02-17 Thread Jeff Garzik
Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch kills include/linux/eeprom.h . Rationale: - it's only used by one single driver - most of this file are non-inline and non-static functions (sic) This patch moves all required contents of this file into ns83820.c and removes include/linux/eeprom.h (and makes

Re: [2.6 patch] kill include/linux/eeprom.h

2005-02-17 Thread Nick Winlund
I agree eeprom is memory technology at the least there should be secondary links for a static or symlinked file that leaves PCI/AT boot devices, future PLOS open to development. Nick I would rather update other drivers to use it :) Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [2.6 patch] kill include/linux/eeprom.h

2005-02-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 01:36:09PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch kills include/linux/eeprom.h . Rationale: - it's only used by one single driver - most of this file are non-inline and non-static functions (sic) This patch moves all required contents of this file