On 2015/3/30 16:37, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2015/3/30 16:28, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>> Ying,
>>
>> can you please try this patch to see if the problem is gone on your side?
> Hi Aubrey,
> I would be better if we could change RTC driver instead.
Hey Gerry,
IRQ8 for RTC is for history reason. If we
On 2015/3/30 16:28, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> Ying,
>
> can you please try this patch to see if the problem is gone on your side?
Hi Aubrey,
I would be better if we could change RTC driver instead.
Thanks!
Gerry
>
> Thanks,
> -Aubrey
>
>
> On 2015/3/26 20:13, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>> On
Ying,
can you please try this patch to see if the problem is gone on your side?
Thanks,
-Aubrey
On 2015/3/26 20:13, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2015/3/25 15:22, Huang Ying wrote:
>> [ 28.745155] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 8. 0080 (mmc0) vs.
>> (rtc0)
>
> okay, I replicated this on
Ying,
can you please try this patch to see if the problem is gone on your side?
Thanks,
-Aubrey
On 2015/3/26 20:13, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2015/3/25 15:22, Huang Ying wrote:
[ 28.745155] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 8. 0080 (mmc0) vs.
(rtc0)
okay, I replicated this on my side
On 2015/3/30 16:28, Li, Aubrey wrote:
Ying,
can you please try this patch to see if the problem is gone on your side?
Hi Aubrey,
I would be better if we could change RTC driver instead.
Thanks!
Gerry
Thanks,
-Aubrey
On 2015/3/26 20:13, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2015/3/25 15:22,
On 2015/3/30 16:37, Jiang Liu wrote:
On 2015/3/30 16:28, Li, Aubrey wrote:
Ying,
can you please try this patch to see if the problem is gone on your side?
Hi Aubrey,
I would be better if we could change RTC driver instead.
Hey Gerry,
IRQ8 for RTC is for history reason. If we
On 2015/3/25 15:22, Huang Ying wrote:
> [ 28.745155] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 8. 0080 (mmc0) vs.
> (rtc0)
okay, I replicated this on my side now.
Firstly, I don't think the patch did anything wrong. However, the patch
exposes a few issues FWICT currently:
- Should we enable
On 2015/3/25 15:22, Huang Ying wrote:
[ 28.745155] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 8. 0080 (mmc0) vs.
(rtc0)
okay, I replicated this on my side now.
Firstly, I don't think the patch did anything wrong. However, the patch
exposes a few issues FWICT currently:
- Should we enable RTC
On 2015/3/24 8:53, Huang Ying wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 14:18 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>> On 2015/3/20 16:38, Huang Ying wrote:
>>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>>>
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>>> commit
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 14:18 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2015/3/20 16:38, Huang Ying wrote:
> > FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > commit 7486341a98f26857f383aec88ffa10950087c3a1 ("x86/platform, acpi:
> >
On 2015/3/20 16:38, Huang Ying wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> commit 7486341a98f26857f383aec88ffa10950087c3a1 ("x86/platform, acpi: Bypass
> legacy PIC and PIT in ACPI hardware reduced mode")
>
>
>
On 2015/3/20 16:38, Huang Ying wrote:
FYI, we noticed the below changes on
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
commit 7486341a98f26857f383aec88ffa10950087c3a1 (x86/platform, acpi: Bypass
legacy PIC and PIT in ACPI hardware reduced mode)
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 14:18 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2015/3/20 16:38, Huang Ying wrote:
FYI, we noticed the below changes on
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
commit 7486341a98f26857f383aec88ffa10950087c3a1 (x86/platform, acpi:
Bypass legacy
On 2015/3/24 8:53, Huang Ying wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 14:18 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2015/3/20 16:38, Huang Ying wrote:
FYI, we noticed the below changes on
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
commit 7486341a98f26857f383aec88ffa10950087c3a1
14 matches
Mail list logo
