Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:40:41AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > There are two PMICs on Cragganmore, currently one dynamically assign
> > its IRQ base and the other uses a fixed base. It is possible for the
> > statically assigned PMIC to fail if its IRQ is taken by the
Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:40:41AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
There are two PMICs on Cragganmore, currently one dynamically assign
its IRQ base and the other uses a fixed base. It is possible for the
statically assigned PMIC to fail if its IRQ is taken by the
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:40:41AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> There are two PMICs on Cragganmore, currently one dynamically assign
> its IRQ base and the other uses a fixed base. It is possible for the
> statically assigned PMIC to fail if its IRQ is taken by the dynamically
> assigned one.
There are two PMICs on Cragganmore, currently one dynamically assign
its IRQ base and the other uses a fixed base. It is possible for the
statically assigned PMIC to fail if its IRQ is taken by the dynamically
assigned one. Fix this by statically assigning both the IRQ bases.
Signed-off-by:
There are two PMICs on Cragganmore, currently one dynamically assign
its IRQ base and the other uses a fixed base. It is possible for the
statically assigned PMIC to fail if its IRQ is taken by the dynamically
assigned one. Fix this by statically assigning both the IRQ bases.
Signed-off-by:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:40:41AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
There are two PMICs on Cragganmore, currently one dynamically assign
its IRQ base and the other uses a fixed base. It is possible for the
statically assigned PMIC to fail if its IRQ is taken by the dynamically
assigned one. Fix
6 matches
Mail list logo