At 2016-09-27 02:57:16, "Jaegeuk Kim" wrote:
>Hi Tiezhu,
>
>On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 05:50:44PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>> There exists almost same codes when get the value of pre_version
>> and cur_version in function validate_checkpoint, this patch adds
>>
At 2016-09-27 02:57:16, "Jaegeuk Kim" wrote:
>Hi Tiezhu,
>
>On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 05:50:44PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>> There exists almost same codes when get the value of pre_version
>> and cur_version in function validate_checkpoint, this patch adds
>> get_checkpoint_version to clean up
Hi Tiezhu,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 05:50:44PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> There exists almost same codes when get the value of pre_version
> and cur_version in function validate_checkpoint, this patch adds
> get_checkpoint_version to clean up redundant codes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang
Hi Tiezhu,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 05:50:44PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> There exists almost same codes when get the value of pre_version
> and cur_version in function validate_checkpoint, this patch adds
> get_checkpoint_version to clean up redundant codes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang
>
4 matches
Mail list logo