On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 22:36:57 +
Richard Lai wrote:
> This particular constant was named with prefix "CCS881", which should be
> "CCS811" instead, just like the rest of constant names in the file, as this
> driver implementation is for AMS CCS811 sensor. "CCS881" could
On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 22:36:57 +
Richard Lai wrote:
> This particular constant was named with prefix "CCS881", which should be
> "CCS811" instead, just like the rest of constant names in the file, as this
> driver implementation is for AMS CCS811 sensor. "CCS881" could literally be
> referring
This particular constant was named with prefix "CCS881", which should be
"CCS811" instead, just like the rest of constant names in the file, as this
driver implementation is for AMS CCS811 sensor. "CCS881" could literally be
referring to another sensor product unrelated to AMS CCS811 sensor.
This particular constant was named with prefix "CCS881", which should be
"CCS811" instead, just like the rest of constant names in the file, as this
driver implementation is for AMS CCS811 sensor. "CCS881" could literally be
referring to another sensor product unrelated to AMS CCS811 sensor.
4 matches
Mail list logo