On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:31:31AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 10/23/2012 4:36 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> > Could you test the following on top of your patch? It gets rid of
> > regs use in sys_clone() *and* of the regs argument in copy_thread().
> > If that work (including SMP - note that it
On 10/23/2012 4:36 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> Could you test the following on top of your patch? It gets rid of
> regs use in sys_clone() *and* of the regs argument in copy_thread().
> If that work (including SMP - note that it changes the path taken
> by copy_thread() when called by fork_idle()), that
On 10/23/2012 4:36 PM, Al Viro wrote:
Could you test the following on top of your patch? It gets rid of
regs use in sys_clone() *and* of the regs argument in copy_thread().
If that work (including SMP - note that it changes the path taken
by copy_thread() when called by fork_idle()), that
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:31:31AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
On 10/23/2012 4:36 PM, Al Viro wrote:
Could you test the following on top of your patch? It gets rid of
regs use in sys_clone() *and* of the regs argument in copy_thread().
If that work (including SMP - note that it changes the
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:22:45PM +0100, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:09:46PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > It is spelled:
> > >
> > > git notes add -m SHA1
> > >
> > > The resulting notes are stored in a separate revision-controlled branch
> > > and can be pushed and
Am 10/24/2012 0:23, schrieb Jeff King:
> For the fold-on-rebase idea, I'd think you would want something similar,
> like setting rebase.foldNotes to "foo" to say "refs/notes/foo contains
> pseudo-headers that should be folded in like a signed-off-by".
If you are rebasing anyway, you can already
* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>
> >> It is spelled:
> >>
> >> git notes add -m SHA1
> >
> > Cool!
>
> Don't use them for anything global.
>
> Use them for local codeflow, but don't expect them to be
> distributed. It's a separate
* Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
It is spelled:
git notes add -m comment SHA1
Cool!
Don't use them for anything global.
Use them for local codeflow, but don't expect them to be
Am 10/24/2012 0:23, schrieb Jeff King:
For the fold-on-rebase idea, I'd think you would want something similar,
like setting rebase.foldNotes to foo to say refs/notes/foo contains
pseudo-headers that should be folded in like a signed-off-by.
If you are rebasing anyway, you can already use
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:22:45PM +0100, Jeff King wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:09:46PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
It is spelled:
git notes add -m comment SHA1
The resulting notes are stored in a separate revision-controlled branch
and can be pushed and pulled like
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Al Viro wrote:
>
> How about git commit --allow-empty, with
> "belated ACK for
Don't bother. It's not that important, and it's just distracting.
It's not like this is vital information. If you pushed it out without
the ack, it's out without the ack. Big deal.
Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:25:06PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > The resulting notes are stored in a separate
> > > revision-controlled branch
> >
> > Which branch(es) is/are that ? What are the semantics of that?
[...]
Nice feature.
Can a later commit be eventually be
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 04:02:49AM +0300, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>
> >> It is spelled:
> >>
> >> git notes add -m SHA1
> >
> > Cool!
>
> Don't use them for anything global.
>
> Use them for local codeflow, but don't expect them to
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>> It is spelled:
>>
>> git notes add -m SHA1
>
> Cool!
Don't use them for anything global.
Use them for local codeflow, but don't expect them to be distributed.
It's a separate "flow", and while it *can* be distributed, it's not
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:06:59PM -0700, Marc Gauthier wrote:
> Can a later commit be eventually be made to reference some set
> of notes added so far, so they become part of the whole history
> signed by the HEAD SHA1? hence pulled/pushed automatically as
> well. Otherwise do you not end up
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:25:06PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > The resulting notes are stored in a separate revision-controlled branch
>
> Which branch(es) is/are that ? What are the semantics of that?
They are stored in refs/notes/commits by default, but you can have
multiple notes refs
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:47:28PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > I agree that this is a common issue. Acked-by/Reviewed-by mails come
> > in after the fact that the patch has been committed to an immutable
> > (i.e no-rebase mode) branch or if the
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:09:46PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > It is spelled:
> >
> > git notes add -m SHA1
> >
> > The resulting notes are stored in a separate revision-controlled branch
> > and can be pushed and pulled like regular refs. Note, though, that the
> > default refspecs do
On 23 October 2012 21:51, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:47:28PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
>> I agree that this is a common issue. Acked-by/Reviewed-by mails come
>> in after the fact that the patch has been committed to an immutable
>> (i.e no-rebase mode) branch or if the
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:47:28PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> I agree that this is a common issue. Acked-by/Reviewed-by mails come
> in after the fact that the patch has been committed to an immutable
> (i.e no-rebase mode) branch or if the change in question already hit
> Linus tree.
>
>
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:30:26PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>
> > I fetched the series from your arch-tile branch and built it, and it works
> > fine. It looks good from my inspection:
> >
> > Acked-by: Chris Metcalf
>
> Thanks; Acked-by applied,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:22:36PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 10/23/2012 2:41 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:30:26PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> >> As you had suggested in an earlier email, I went ahead and eliminated the
> >> special pt_regs handling for sigaltstack,
On 10/23/2012 2:41 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:30:26PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>> As you had suggested in an earlier email, I went ahead and eliminated the
>> special pt_regs handling for sigaltstack, rt_sigreturn, and clone. (Also a
>> tilepro-specific syscall that was
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:30:26PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> I fetched the series from your arch-tile branch and built it, and it works
> fine. It looks good from my inspection:
>
> Acked-by: Chris Metcalf
Thanks; Acked-by applied, branch pushed and put into no-rebase mode.
BTW,
On 10/20/2012 1:16 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 04:34:01PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 09:06:57AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>>> First, the compat_sys_execve() declaration provided in
>>> arch/tile/include/asm/compat.h isn't right, so I deleted that (you had
On 10/20/2012 1:16 PM, Al Viro wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 04:34:01PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 09:06:57AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
First, the compat_sys_execve() declaration provided in
arch/tile/include/asm/compat.h isn't right, so I deleted that (you had only
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:30:26PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
I fetched the series from your arch-tile branch and built it, and it works
fine. It looks good from my inspection:
Acked-by: Chris Metcalf cmetc...@tilera.com
Thanks; Acked-by applied, branch pushed and put into no-rebase mode.
On 10/23/2012 2:41 PM, Al Viro wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:30:26PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
As you had suggested in an earlier email, I went ahead and eliminated the
special pt_regs handling for sigaltstack, rt_sigreturn, and clone. (Also a
tilepro-specific syscall that was also
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:22:36PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
On 10/23/2012 2:41 PM, Al Viro wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:30:26PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
As you had suggested in an earlier email, I went ahead and eliminated the
special pt_regs handling for sigaltstack,
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Al Viro wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:30:26PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
I fetched the series from your arch-tile branch and built it, and it works
fine. It looks good from my inspection:
Acked-by: Chris Metcalf cmetc...@tilera.com
Thanks; Acked-by
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:47:28PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
I agree that this is a common issue. Acked-by/Reviewed-by mails come
in after the fact that the patch has been committed to an immutable
(i.e no-rebase mode) branch or if the change in question already hit
Linus tree.
Still
On 23 October 2012 21:51, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:47:28PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
I agree that this is a common issue. Acked-by/Reviewed-by mails come
in after the fact that the patch has been committed to an immutable
(i.e no-rebase mode) branch or if
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:09:46PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
It is spelled:
git notes add -m comment SHA1
The resulting notes are stored in a separate revision-controlled branch
and can be pushed and pulled like regular refs. Note, though, that the
default refspecs do not yet
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Jeff King wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:47:28PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
I agree that this is a common issue. Acked-by/Reviewed-by mails come
in after the fact that the patch has been committed to an immutable
(i.e no-rebase mode) branch or if the change in
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:25:06PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
The resulting notes are stored in a separate revision-controlled branch
Which branch(es) is/are that ? What are the semantics of that?
They are stored in refs/notes/commits by default, but you can have
multiple notes refs if
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:06:59PM -0700, Marc Gauthier wrote:
Can a later commit be eventually be made to reference some set
of notes added so far, so they become part of the whole history
signed by the HEAD SHA1? hence pulled/pushed automatically as
well. Otherwise do you not end up with
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
It is spelled:
git notes add -m comment SHA1
Cool!
Don't use them for anything global.
Use them for local codeflow, but don't expect them to be distributed.
It's a separate flow, and while it *can* be
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 04:02:49AM +0300, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
It is spelled:
git notes add -m comment SHA1
Cool!
Don't use them for anything global.
Use them for local codeflow, but don't expect them
Jeff King wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:25:06PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
The resulting notes are stored in a separate
revision-controlled branch
Which branch(es) is/are that ? What are the semantics of that?
[...]
Nice feature.
Can a later commit be eventually be made to
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk wrote:
How about git commit --allow-empty, with
belated ACK for commit
Don't bother. It's not that important, and it's just distracting.
It's not like this is vital information. If you pushed it out without
the ack, it's out
Hi Al,
Sorry, couldn't reply earlier.
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 04:34:01PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 09:06:57AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> > First, the compat_sys_execve() declaration provided in
> > arch/tile/include/asm/compat.h isn't right, so I deleted that (you had
Hi Al,
Sorry, couldn't reply earlier.
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 04:34:01PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 09:06:57AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
First, the compat_sys_execve() declaration provided in
arch/tile/include/asm/compat.h isn't right, so I deleted that (you had only
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 04:34:01PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 09:06:57AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> > First, the compat_sys_execve() declaration provided in
> > arch/tile/include/asm/compat.h isn't right, so I deleted that (you had only
> > deleted the PTREGS_SYSCALL
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 09:06:57AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> First, the compat_sys_execve() declaration provided in
> arch/tile/include/asm/compat.h isn't right, so I deleted that (you had only
> deleted the PTREGS_SYSCALL trampoline declaration, _compat_sys_execve).
>
> However, then
On 10/19/2012 5:35 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:25:12PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>> Also provide an optimized current_pt_regs() while we're at it.
> Applied. BTW, are you sure you want to record parent's pid and not tid?
By recording ->pid rather than ->pgid, we ARE
On 10/19/2012 5:35 PM, Al Viro wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:25:12PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
Also provide an optimized current_pt_regs() while we're at it.
Applied. BTW, are you sure you want to record parent's pid and not tid?
By recording -pid rather than -pgid, we ARE recording the
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 09:06:57AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
First, the compat_sys_execve() declaration provided in
arch/tile/include/asm/compat.h isn't right, so I deleted that (you had only
deleted the PTREGS_SYSCALL trampoline declaration, _compat_sys_execve).
However, then
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 04:34:01PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 09:06:57AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
First, the compat_sys_execve() declaration provided in
arch/tile/include/asm/compat.h isn't right, so I deleted that (you had only
deleted the PTREGS_SYSCALL trampoline
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:25:12PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> Also provide an optimized current_pt_regs() while we're at it.
Applied. BTW, are you sure you want to record parent's pid and not tid?
Anyway, here's a followup on top of this one (again, completely untested) -
switching to
Also provide an optimized current_pt_regs() while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf
---
[Re-sending to correct linus-arch / linux-arch typo.]
arch/tile/Kconfig |2 +
arch/tile/include/asm/processor.h |3 ++
arch/tile/include/asm/switch_to.h |5 +-
Also provide an optimized current_pt_regs() while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf
---
arch/tile/Kconfig |2 +
arch/tile/include/asm/processor.h |3 ++
arch/tile/include/asm/switch_to.h |5 +-
arch/tile/kernel/entry.S | 11
Also provide an optimized current_pt_regs() while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf cmetc...@tilera.com
---
arch/tile/Kconfig |2 +
arch/tile/include/asm/processor.h |3 ++
arch/tile/include/asm/switch_to.h |5 +-
arch/tile/kernel/entry.S | 11
Also provide an optimized current_pt_regs() while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf cmetc...@tilera.com
---
[Re-sending to correct linus-arch / linux-arch typo.]
arch/tile/Kconfig |2 +
arch/tile/include/asm/processor.h |3 ++
arch/tile/include/asm/switch_to.h |
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:25:12PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
Also provide an optimized current_pt_regs() while we're at it.
Applied. BTW, are you sure you want to record parent's pid and not tid?
Anyway, here's a followup on top of this one (again, completely untested) -
switching to generic
54 matches
Mail list logo
