Re: [PATCH] ubifs: compress lines for immediate return

[Richard Weinberger]

Heiko,

On 05.09.2016 06:59, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> fix the following code:
> 
> -ret = expression;
> -if (ret)
> -return ret;
> -return 0;
> +return expression;

"Fix"? ;-)
What was broken?

I agree that we can write the expression in a different way, but is it really 
worth it?
Is this part of a tree-wide cleanup?

Thanks,
//richard

Re: [PATCH] ubifs: compress lines for immediate return

[Richard Weinberger]

Heiko,

On 05.09.2016 06:59, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> fix the following code:
> 
> -ret = expression;
> -if (ret)
> -return ret;
> -return 0;
> +return expression;

"Fix"? ;-)
What was broken?

I agree that we can write the expression in a different way, but is it really 
worth it?
Is this part of a tree-wide cleanup?

Thanks,
//richard

Re: [PATCH] ubifs: compress lines for immediate return

[Richard Weinberger]

Heiko,

On 05.09.2016 08:35, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> I think yes ...
> 
>> Is this part of a tree-wide cleanup?
> 
> Yes, and I thought it is worth to change this part in linux too.

Agreed. Can you please resend with a proper change log and (more important)
a correct sob-chain? From: and first Signed-of-by: should be Masahiro Yamada 

followed by a Signed-of-by: you.

Thanks,
//richard

Re: [PATCH] ubifs: compress lines for immediate return

[Richard Weinberger]

Heiko,

On 05.09.2016 08:35, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> I think yes ...
> 
>> Is this part of a tree-wide cleanup?
> 
> Yes, and I thought it is worth to change this part in linux too.

Agreed. Can you please resend with a proper change log and (more important)
a correct sob-chain? From: and first Signed-of-by: should be Masahiro Yamada 

followed by a Signed-of-by: you.

Thanks,
//richard

Re: [PATCH] ubifs: compress lines for immediate return

[Heiko Schocher]

Hello Richard,

Am 05.09.2016 um 08:28 schrieb Richard Weinberger:

Heiko,

On 05.09.2016 06:59, Heiko Schocher wrote:

fix the following code:

-ret = expression;
-if (ret)
-return ret;
-return 0;
+return expression;


"Fix"? ;-)
What was broken?


Ok, fix is to hard spoken ... nothing broken, sorry for confusing!


I agree that we can write the expression in a different way, but is it really 
worth it?


I think yes ...


Is this part of a tree-wide cleanup?


Yes, and I thought it is worth to change this part in linux too.

bye,
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,  Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

Re: [PATCH] ubifs: compress lines for immediate return

[Heiko Schocher]

Hello Richard,

Am 05.09.2016 um 08:28 schrieb Richard Weinberger:

Heiko,

On 05.09.2016 06:59, Heiko Schocher wrote:

fix the following code:

-ret = expression;
-if (ret)
-return ret;
-return 0;
+return expression;


"Fix"? ;-)
What was broken?


Ok, fix is to hard spoken ... nothing broken, sorry for confusing!


I agree that we can write the expression in a different way, but is it really 
worth it?


I think yes ...


Is this part of a tree-wide cleanup?


Yes, and I thought it is worth to change this part in linux too.

bye,
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,  Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

Re: [PATCH] ubifs: compress lines for immediate return

[Richard Weinberger]

Heiko,

On 05.09.2016 08:35, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> I think yes ...
> 
>> Is this part of a tree-wide cleanup?
> 
> Yes, and I thought it is worth to change this part in linux too.

Agreed. Can you please resend with a proper change log and (more important)
a correct sob-chain? From: and first Signed-of-by: should be Masahiro Yamada 

followed by a Signed-of-by: you.

Thanks,
//richard

Re: [PATCH] ubifs: compress lines for immediate return

[Richard Weinberger]

Heiko,

On 05.09.2016 08:35, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> I think yes ...
> 
>> Is this part of a tree-wide cleanup?
> 
> Yes, and I thought it is worth to change this part in linux too.

Agreed. Can you please resend with a proper change log and (more important)
a correct sob-chain? From: and first Signed-of-by: should be Masahiro Yamada 

followed by a Signed-of-by: you.

Thanks,
//richard

Re: [PATCH] ubifs: compress lines for immediate return

[Richard Weinberger]

Heiko,

On 05.09.2016 06:59, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> fix the following code:
> 
> -ret = expression;
> -if (ret)
> -return ret;
> -return 0;
> +return expression;

"Fix"? ;-)
What was broken?

I agree that we can write the expression in a different way, but is it really 
worth it?
Is this part of a tree-wide cleanup?

Thanks,
//richard

Re: [PATCH] ubifs: compress lines for immediate return

[Richard Weinberger]

Heiko,

On 05.09.2016 06:59, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> fix the following code:
> 
> -ret = expression;
> -if (ret)
> -return ret;
> -return 0;
> +return expression;

"Fix"? ;-)
What was broken?

I agree that we can write the expression in a different way, but is it really 
worth it?
Is this part of a tree-wide cleanup?

Thanks,
//richard

[PATCH] ubifs: compress lines for immediate return

[Heiko Schocher]

fix the following code:

-ret = expression;
-if (ret)
-return ret;
-return 0;
+return expression;

From: Masahiro Yamada 
posted on the U-Boot mailinglist.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher 
---

 fs/ubifs/budget.c | 7 ++-
 fs/ubifs/gc.c | 6 ++
 fs/ubifs/lpt_commit.c | 5 +
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ubifs/budget.c b/fs/ubifs/budget.c
index 11a11b3..48d6851 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/budget.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/budget.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static void shrink_liability(struct ubifs_info *c, int 
nr_to_write)
  */
 static int run_gc(struct ubifs_info *c)
 {
-   int err, lnum;
+   int lnum;
 
/* Make some free space by garbage-collecting dirty space */
down_read(>commit_sem);
@@ -88,10 +88,7 @@ static int run_gc(struct ubifs_info *c)
 
/* GC freed one LEB, return it to lprops */
dbg_budg("GC freed LEB %d", lnum);
-   err = ubifs_return_leb(c, lnum);
-   if (err)
-   return err;
-   return 0;
+   return = ubifs_return_leb(c, lnum);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/gc.c b/fs/ubifs/gc.c
index 821b348..88cd61d 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/gc.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/gc.c
@@ -297,10 +297,8 @@ static int sort_nodes(struct ubifs_info *c, struct 
ubifs_scan_leb *sleb,
err = dbg_check_data_nodes_order(c, >nodes);
if (err)
return err;
-   err = dbg_check_nondata_nodes_order(c, nondata);
-   if (err)
-   return err;
-   return 0;
+
+   return dbg_check_nondata_nodes_order(c, nondata);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/lpt_commit.c b/fs/ubifs/lpt_commit.c
index ce89bdc..79a8e96 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/lpt_commit.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/lpt_commit.c
@@ -313,10 +313,7 @@ static int layout_cnodes(struct ubifs_info *c)
alen = ALIGN(offs, c->min_io_size);
upd_ltab(c, lnum, c->leb_size - alen, alen - offs);
dbg_chk_lpt_sz(c, 4, alen - offs);
-   err = dbg_chk_lpt_sz(c, 3, alen);
-   if (err)
-   return err;
-   return 0;
+   return dbg_chk_lpt_sz(c, 3, alen);
 
 no_space:
ubifs_err(c, "LPT out of space at LEB %d:%d needing %d, done_ltab %d, 
done_lsave %d",
-- 
2.5.5

[PATCH] ubifs: compress lines for immediate return

[Heiko Schocher]

fix the following code:

-ret = expression;
-if (ret)
-return ret;
-return 0;
+return expression;

From: Masahiro Yamada 
posted on the U-Boot mailinglist.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher 
---

 fs/ubifs/budget.c | 7 ++-
 fs/ubifs/gc.c | 6 ++
 fs/ubifs/lpt_commit.c | 5 +
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ubifs/budget.c b/fs/ubifs/budget.c
index 11a11b3..48d6851 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/budget.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/budget.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static void shrink_liability(struct ubifs_info *c, int 
nr_to_write)
  */
 static int run_gc(struct ubifs_info *c)
 {
-   int err, lnum;
+   int lnum;
 
/* Make some free space by garbage-collecting dirty space */
down_read(>commit_sem);
@@ -88,10 +88,7 @@ static int run_gc(struct ubifs_info *c)
 
/* GC freed one LEB, return it to lprops */
dbg_budg("GC freed LEB %d", lnum);
-   err = ubifs_return_leb(c, lnum);
-   if (err)
-   return err;
-   return 0;
+   return = ubifs_return_leb(c, lnum);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/gc.c b/fs/ubifs/gc.c
index 821b348..88cd61d 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/gc.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/gc.c
@@ -297,10 +297,8 @@ static int sort_nodes(struct ubifs_info *c, struct 
ubifs_scan_leb *sleb,
err = dbg_check_data_nodes_order(c, >nodes);
if (err)
return err;
-   err = dbg_check_nondata_nodes_order(c, nondata);
-   if (err)
-   return err;
-   return 0;
+
+   return dbg_check_nondata_nodes_order(c, nondata);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/lpt_commit.c b/fs/ubifs/lpt_commit.c
index ce89bdc..79a8e96 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/lpt_commit.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/lpt_commit.c
@@ -313,10 +313,7 @@ static int layout_cnodes(struct ubifs_info *c)
alen = ALIGN(offs, c->min_io_size);
upd_ltab(c, lnum, c->leb_size - alen, alen - offs);
dbg_chk_lpt_sz(c, 4, alen - offs);
-   err = dbg_chk_lpt_sz(c, 3, alen);
-   if (err)
-   return err;
-   return 0;
+   return dbg_chk_lpt_sz(c, 3, alen);
 
 no_space:
ubifs_err(c, "LPT out of space at LEB %d:%d needing %d, done_ltab %d, 
done_lsave %d",
-- 
2.5.5