Re: [PATCH 01/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Make PCI optional for ACPI on ARM64
On 2014-1-18 0:00, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Jens, James, Ben, Fujita (authors of PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS usage)]
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> Not all the ARM64 targets that are using ACPI have PCI, so introduce
>> some stub functions to make PCI optional for ACPI, and make ACPI core
>> run without CONFIG_PCI on ARM64.
>>
>> pcibios_penalize_isa_irq() is arch dependent, introduce asm/pci.h to
>> include it.
>>
>> Since ACPI on X86 and IA64 depends on PCI, it will not break X86 and
>> IA64 with this patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory
>> Signed-off-by: Al Stone
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h | 20
>> drivers/acpi/Makefile|2 +-
>> drivers/acpi/internal.h |7 +++
>> drivers/acpi/osl.c |3 ++-
>> include/linux/pci.h | 33 -
>> 5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000..455909d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
>> +#ifndef __ASMARM64_PCI_H
>> +#define __ASMARM64_PCI_H
>> +
>> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
>> +
>> +static inline void pcibios_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
>> +{
>> + /* We don't do dynamic PCI IRQ allocation */
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * The PCI address space does equal the physical memory address space.
>> + * The networking and block device layers use this boolean for bounce
>> + * buffer decisions.
>> + */
>> +#define PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS (1)
>
> I'm not sure this is accurate. The arm code uses
> pci_add_resource_offset() with non-zero offsets, which means a
> physical memory address is not the same as a PCI bus address. I don't
> know what arm64 does for PCI, but I suspect it is similar.
I'm not sure either. I copied this code from arm/asm/pci.h and I
thought it will be the same for ARM64.
>
> I think PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS is due for some overhaul. I'm dubious
> that it is working as intended anymore. At the very least, it seems
> like something that is dependent on the device in question.
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
>> index a13d682..726cf2a 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
>> ...
>> +static inline int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
>> + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val)
>> +{ return -EINVAL; }
>> +
>> +static inline int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
>> + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val)
>> +{return -EINVAL; }
>
> Fix the spacing here (missing a space before "return").
>
> With that, this include/linux/pci.h change is:
>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas
Thanks!
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 01/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Make PCI optional for ACPI on ARM64
On 2014-1-18 0:00, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
[+cc Jens, James, Ben, Fujita (authors of PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS usage)]
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote:
Not all the ARM64 targets that are using ACPI have PCI, so introduce
some stub functions to make PCI optional for ACPI, and make ACPI core
run without CONFIG_PCI on ARM64.
pcibios_penalize_isa_irq() is arch dependent, introduce asm/pci.h to
include it.
Since ACPI on X86 and IA64 depends on PCI, it will not break X86 and
IA64 with this patch.
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory graeme.greg...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Al Stone al.st...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h | 20
drivers/acpi/Makefile|2 +-
drivers/acpi/internal.h |7 +++
drivers/acpi/osl.c |3 ++-
include/linux/pci.h | 33 -
5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
new file mode 100644
index 000..455909d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+#ifndef __ASMARM64_PCI_H
+#define __ASMARM64_PCI_H
+
+#ifdef __KERNEL__
+
+static inline void pcibios_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
+{
+ /* We don't do dynamic PCI IRQ allocation */
+}
+
+/*
+ * The PCI address space does equal the physical memory address space.
+ * The networking and block device layers use this boolean for bounce
+ * buffer decisions.
+ */
+#define PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS (1)
I'm not sure this is accurate. The arm code uses
pci_add_resource_offset() with non-zero offsets, which means a
physical memory address is not the same as a PCI bus address. I don't
know what arm64 does for PCI, but I suspect it is similar.
I'm not sure either. I copied this code from arm/asm/pci.h and I
thought it will be the same for ARM64.
I think PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS is due for some overhaul. I'm dubious
that it is working as intended anymore. At the very least, it seems
like something that is dependent on the device in question.
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index a13d682..726cf2a 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
...
+static inline int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
+ unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val)
+{ return -EINVAL; }
+
+static inline int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
+ unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val)
+{return -EINVAL; }
Fix the spacing here (missing a space before return).
With that, this include/linux/pci.h change is:
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas bhelg...@google.com
Thanks!
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 01/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Make PCI optional for ACPI on ARM64
[+cc Jens, James, Ben, Fujita (authors of PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS usage)]
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Not all the ARM64 targets that are using ACPI have PCI, so introduce
> some stub functions to make PCI optional for ACPI, and make ACPI core
> run without CONFIG_PCI on ARM64.
>
> pcibios_penalize_isa_irq() is arch dependent, introduce asm/pci.h to
> include it.
>
> Since ACPI on X86 and IA64 depends on PCI, it will not break X86 and
> IA64 with this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory
> Signed-off-by: Al Stone
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h | 20
> drivers/acpi/Makefile|2 +-
> drivers/acpi/internal.h |7 +++
> drivers/acpi/osl.c |3 ++-
> include/linux/pci.h | 33 -
> 5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..455909d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +#ifndef __ASMARM64_PCI_H
> +#define __ASMARM64_PCI_H
> +
> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> +
> +static inline void pcibios_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
> +{
> + /* We don't do dynamic PCI IRQ allocation */
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * The PCI address space does equal the physical memory address space.
> + * The networking and block device layers use this boolean for bounce
> + * buffer decisions.
> + */
> +#define PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS (1)
I'm not sure this is accurate. The arm code uses
pci_add_resource_offset() with non-zero offsets, which means a
physical memory address is not the same as a PCI bus address. I don't
know what arm64 does for PCI, but I suspect it is similar.
I think PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS is due for some overhaul. I'm dubious
that it is working as intended anymore. At the very least, it seems
like something that is dependent on the device in question.
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index a13d682..726cf2a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> ...
> +static inline int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
> + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val)
> +{ return -EINVAL; }
> +
> +static inline int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
> + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val)
> +{return -EINVAL; }
Fix the spacing here (missing a space before "return").
With that, this include/linux/pci.h change is:
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH 01/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Make PCI optional for ACPI on ARM64
Not all the ARM64 targets that are using ACPI have PCI, so introduce
some stub functions to make PCI optional for ACPI, and make ACPI core
run without CONFIG_PCI on ARM64.
pcibios_penalize_isa_irq() is arch dependent, introduce asm/pci.h to
include it.
Since ACPI on X86 and IA64 depends on PCI, it will not break X86 and
IA64 with this patch.
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory
Signed-off-by: Al Stone
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h | 20
drivers/acpi/Makefile|2 +-
drivers/acpi/internal.h |7 +++
drivers/acpi/osl.c |3 ++-
include/linux/pci.h | 33 -
5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
new file mode 100644
index 000..455909d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+#ifndef __ASMARM64_PCI_H
+#define __ASMARM64_PCI_H
+
+#ifdef __KERNEL__
+
+static inline void pcibios_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
+{
+ /* We don't do dynamic PCI IRQ allocation */
+}
+
+/*
+ * The PCI address space does equal the physical memory address space.
+ * The networking and block device layers use this boolean for bounce
+ * buffer decisions.
+ */
+#define PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS (1)
+
+#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
+
+#endif /* __ASMARM64_PCI_H */
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
index 0331f91..d8cebe3 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ acpi-y+= acpi_processor.o
acpi-y += processor_core.o
acpi-y += ec.o
acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK) += dock.o
-acpi-y += pci_root.o pci_link.o pci_irq.o
+acpi-$(CONFIG_PCI) += pci_root.o pci_link.o pci_irq.o
acpi-$(CONFIG_X86_INTEL_LPSS) += acpi_lpss.o
acpi-y += acpi_platform.o
acpi-y += power.o
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
index a29739c..52dff47 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
+++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
@@ -26,9 +26,16 @@
acpi_status acpi_os_initialize1(void);
int init_acpi_device_notify(void);
int acpi_scan_init(void);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
void acpi_pci_root_init(void);
void acpi_pci_link_init(void);
void acpi_pci_root_hp_init(void);
+#else
+static inline void acpi_pci_root_init(void) {}
+static inline void acpi_pci_link_init(void) {}
+static inline void acpi_pci_root_hp_init(void) {}
+#endif /* CONFIG_PCI */
+
void acpi_processor_init(void);
void acpi_platform_init(void);
int acpi_sysfs_init(void);
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
index 54a20ff..14ee6fc 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
@@ -1050,7 +1050,8 @@ acpi_os_read_pci_configuration(struct acpi_pci_id *
pci_id, u32 reg,
result = raw_pci_read(pci_id->segment, pci_id->bus,
PCI_DEVFN(pci_id->device, pci_id->function),
reg, size, );
- *value = value32;
+ if (!result)
+ *value = value32;
return (result ? AE_ERROR : AE_OK);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index a13d682..726cf2a 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -541,15 +541,6 @@ struct pci_ops {
int (*write)(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int where, int
size, u32 val);
};
-/*
- * ACPI needs to be able to access PCI config space before we've done a
- * PCI bus scan and created pci_bus structures.
- */
-int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn,
-int reg, int len, u32 *val);
-int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn,
- int reg, int len, u32 val);
-
struct pci_bus_region {
resource_size_t start;
resource_size_t end;
@@ -1281,6 +1272,15 @@ typedef int (*arch_set_vga_state_t)(struct pci_dev
*pdev, bool decode,
unsigned int command_bits, u32 flags);
void pci_register_set_vga_state(arch_set_vga_state_t func);
+/*
+ * ACPI needs to be able to access PCI config space before we've done a
+ * PCI bus scan and created pci_bus structures.
+ */
+int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn,
+int reg, int len, u32 *val);
+int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn,
+ int reg, int len, u32 val);
+
#else /* CONFIG_PCI is not enabled */
/*
@@ -1477,6 +1477,21 @@ static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus)
static inline struct pci_dev *pci_dev_get(struct pci_dev *dev)
{ return NULL; }
+static inline struct pci_bus *pci_find_bus(int domain, int busnr)
+{ return NULL; }
+
+static inline int pci_bus_write_config_byte(struct pci_bus *bus,
+
[PATCH 01/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Make PCI optional for ACPI on ARM64
Not all the ARM64 targets that are using ACPI have PCI, so introduce
some stub functions to make PCI optional for ACPI, and make ACPI core
run without CONFIG_PCI on ARM64.
pcibios_penalize_isa_irq() is arch dependent, introduce asm/pci.h to
include it.
Since ACPI on X86 and IA64 depends on PCI, it will not break X86 and
IA64 with this patch.
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory graeme.greg...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Al Stone al.st...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h | 20
drivers/acpi/Makefile|2 +-
drivers/acpi/internal.h |7 +++
drivers/acpi/osl.c |3 ++-
include/linux/pci.h | 33 -
5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
new file mode 100644
index 000..455909d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+#ifndef __ASMARM64_PCI_H
+#define __ASMARM64_PCI_H
+
+#ifdef __KERNEL__
+
+static inline void pcibios_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
+{
+ /* We don't do dynamic PCI IRQ allocation */
+}
+
+/*
+ * The PCI address space does equal the physical memory address space.
+ * The networking and block device layers use this boolean for bounce
+ * buffer decisions.
+ */
+#define PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS (1)
+
+#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
+
+#endif /* __ASMARM64_PCI_H */
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
index 0331f91..d8cebe3 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ acpi-y+= acpi_processor.o
acpi-y += processor_core.o
acpi-y += ec.o
acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK) += dock.o
-acpi-y += pci_root.o pci_link.o pci_irq.o
+acpi-$(CONFIG_PCI) += pci_root.o pci_link.o pci_irq.o
acpi-$(CONFIG_X86_INTEL_LPSS) += acpi_lpss.o
acpi-y += acpi_platform.o
acpi-y += power.o
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
index a29739c..52dff47 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
+++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
@@ -26,9 +26,16 @@
acpi_status acpi_os_initialize1(void);
int init_acpi_device_notify(void);
int acpi_scan_init(void);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
void acpi_pci_root_init(void);
void acpi_pci_link_init(void);
void acpi_pci_root_hp_init(void);
+#else
+static inline void acpi_pci_root_init(void) {}
+static inline void acpi_pci_link_init(void) {}
+static inline void acpi_pci_root_hp_init(void) {}
+#endif /* CONFIG_PCI */
+
void acpi_processor_init(void);
void acpi_platform_init(void);
int acpi_sysfs_init(void);
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
index 54a20ff..14ee6fc 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
@@ -1050,7 +1050,8 @@ acpi_os_read_pci_configuration(struct acpi_pci_id *
pci_id, u32 reg,
result = raw_pci_read(pci_id-segment, pci_id-bus,
PCI_DEVFN(pci_id-device, pci_id-function),
reg, size, value32);
- *value = value32;
+ if (!result)
+ *value = value32;
return (result ? AE_ERROR : AE_OK);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index a13d682..726cf2a 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -541,15 +541,6 @@ struct pci_ops {
int (*write)(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int where, int
size, u32 val);
};
-/*
- * ACPI needs to be able to access PCI config space before we've done a
- * PCI bus scan and created pci_bus structures.
- */
-int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn,
-int reg, int len, u32 *val);
-int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn,
- int reg, int len, u32 val);
-
struct pci_bus_region {
resource_size_t start;
resource_size_t end;
@@ -1281,6 +1272,15 @@ typedef int (*arch_set_vga_state_t)(struct pci_dev
*pdev, bool decode,
unsigned int command_bits, u32 flags);
void pci_register_set_vga_state(arch_set_vga_state_t func);
+/*
+ * ACPI needs to be able to access PCI config space before we've done a
+ * PCI bus scan and created pci_bus structures.
+ */
+int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn,
+int reg, int len, u32 *val);
+int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn,
+ int reg, int len, u32 val);
+
#else /* CONFIG_PCI is not enabled */
/*
@@ -1477,6 +1477,21 @@ static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus)
static inline struct pci_dev *pci_dev_get(struct pci_dev *dev)
{ return NULL; }
+static inline struct pci_bus *pci_find_bus(int domain, int busnr)
+{ return NULL; }
+
+static inline
Re: [PATCH 01/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Make PCI optional for ACPI on ARM64
[+cc Jens, James, Ben, Fujita (authors of PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS usage)]
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote:
Not all the ARM64 targets that are using ACPI have PCI, so introduce
some stub functions to make PCI optional for ACPI, and make ACPI core
run without CONFIG_PCI on ARM64.
pcibios_penalize_isa_irq() is arch dependent, introduce asm/pci.h to
include it.
Since ACPI on X86 and IA64 depends on PCI, it will not break X86 and
IA64 with this patch.
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory graeme.greg...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Al Stone al.st...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h | 20
drivers/acpi/Makefile|2 +-
drivers/acpi/internal.h |7 +++
drivers/acpi/osl.c |3 ++-
include/linux/pci.h | 33 -
5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
new file mode 100644
index 000..455909d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+#ifndef __ASMARM64_PCI_H
+#define __ASMARM64_PCI_H
+
+#ifdef __KERNEL__
+
+static inline void pcibios_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
+{
+ /* We don't do dynamic PCI IRQ allocation */
+}
+
+/*
+ * The PCI address space does equal the physical memory address space.
+ * The networking and block device layers use this boolean for bounce
+ * buffer decisions.
+ */
+#define PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS (1)
I'm not sure this is accurate. The arm code uses
pci_add_resource_offset() with non-zero offsets, which means a
physical memory address is not the same as a PCI bus address. I don't
know what arm64 does for PCI, but I suspect it is similar.
I think PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS is due for some overhaul. I'm dubious
that it is working as intended anymore. At the very least, it seems
like something that is dependent on the device in question.
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index a13d682..726cf2a 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
...
+static inline int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
+ unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val)
+{ return -EINVAL; }
+
+static inline int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
+ unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val)
+{return -EINVAL; }
Fix the spacing here (missing a space before return).
With that, this include/linux/pci.h change is:
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas bhelg...@google.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
