There is a duplicated test on line 360.
julia
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 23:04:18 +0800
From: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>
To: kbu...@01.org
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] mmc: reduce use of block bounce
There is a duplicated test on line 360.
julia
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 23:04:18 +0800
From: kbuild test robot
To: kbu...@01.org
Cc: Julia Lawall
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] mmc: reduce use of block bounce buffers
CC: kbuild-...@01.org
In-Reply
On 16/04/18 09:50, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
We can rely on the dma-mapping code to handle any DMA limits that is
bigger than the ISA DMA mask for us (either using an iommu or swiotlb),
so remove setting the block layer bounce limit for anything but bouncing
for highmem pages.
Signed-off-by:
On 16/04/18 09:50, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
We can rely on the dma-mapping code to handle any DMA limits that is
bigger than the ISA DMA mask for us (either using an iommu or swiotlb),
so remove setting the block layer bounce limit for anything but bouncing
for highmem pages.
Signed-off-by:
We can rely on the dma-mapping code to handle any DMA limits that is
bigger than the ISA DMA mask for us (either using an iommu or swiotlb),
so remove setting the block layer bounce limit for anything but bouncing
for highmem pages.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
We can rely on the dma-mapping code to handle any DMA limits that is
bigger than the ISA DMA mask for us (either using an iommu or swiotlb),
so remove setting the block layer bounce limit for anything but bouncing
for highmem pages.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
6 matches
Mail list logo