On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 20:00 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 12:26 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 20:37 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Ian Kent writes:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 10:43 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > > > Ian Kent writes:
> >
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 08:14 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ian Kent writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 11:05 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Ian Kent writes:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 14:15 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > > > Ian Kent writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > 2> O
Ian Kent writes:
> On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 11:05 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Ian Kent writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 14:15 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > > Ian Kent writes:
>> > >
>> > > 2> On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 20:37 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > > > > Ian Kent writ
On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 11:05 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ian Kent writes:
>
> > On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 14:15 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Ian Kent writes:
> > >
> > > 2> On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 20:37 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > > > Ian Kent writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > O
Ian Kent writes:
> On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 14:15 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Ian Kent writes:
>>
>> 2> On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 20:37 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > > Ian Kent writes:
>> > >
>> > > > On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 10:43 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > > > > Ian Kent writ
On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 14:15 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ian Kent writes:
>
> 2> On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 20:37 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Ian Kent writes:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 10:43 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > > > Ian Kent writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > E
Ian Kent writes:
2> On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 20:37 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Ian Kent writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 10:43 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > > Ian Kent writes:
>> > >
>> > > > Eric, Mateusz, I appreciate your spending time on this and particularly
>> > > > poin
On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 12:26 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 20:37 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Ian Kent writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 10:43 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > > Ian Kent writes:
> > > >
> > > > > Eric, Mateusz, I appreciate your spending time o
On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 20:37 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ian Kent writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 10:43 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Ian Kent writes:
> > >
> > > > Eric, Mateusz, I appreciate your spending time on this and particularly
> > > > pointing
> > > > out my embarrass
Ian Kent writes:
> On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 10:43 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Ian Kent writes:
>>
>> > Eric, Mateusz, I appreciate your spending time on this and particularly
>> > pointing
>> > out my embarrassingly stupid is_local_mountpoint() usage mistake.
>> >
>> > Please accept my apo
On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 10:43 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ian Kent writes:
>
> > Eric, Mateusz, I appreciate your spending time on this and particularly
> > pointing
> > out my embarrassingly stupid is_local_mountpoint() usage mistake.
> >
> > Please accept my apology for the inconvenience.
Ian Kent writes:
> Eric, Mateusz, I appreciate your spending time on this and particularly
> pointing
> out my embarrassingly stupid is_local_mountpoint() usage mistake.
>
> Please accept my apology for the inconvenience.
>
> If all goes well (in testing) I'll have follow up patches to correct t
On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 07:00 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 06:44 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 11:50 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Ian Kent writes:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, 2016-09-17 at 22:10 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02
On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 06:44 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 11:50 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Ian Kent writes:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2016-09-17 at 22:10 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:14:45PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > > > If an automount mount
On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 11:50 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ian Kent writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2016-09-17 at 22:10 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:14:45PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > > If an automount mount is clone(2)ed into a file system that is
> > > > propagation p
Ian Kent writes:
> On Sat, 2016-09-17 at 22:10 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:14:45PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
>> > If an automount mount is clone(2)ed into a file system that is
>> > propagation private, when it later expires in the originating
>> > namespace subsequent
Ian Kent writes:
> On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 10:58 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
>> On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 19:47 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > Ian Kent writes:
>> >
>> > > On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 21:08 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > > > Ian Kent writes:
>> > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, 2016-09-14 a
On Sat, 2016-09-17 at 22:10 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:14:45PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > If an automount mount is clone(2)ed into a file system that is
> > propagation private, when it later expires in the originating
> > namespace subsequent calls to autofs ->d_autom
On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 10:58 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 19:47 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Ian Kent writes:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 21:08 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > > Ian Kent writes:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 12:28 -0500, Eric W. Biede
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:14:45PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> If an automount mount is clone(2)ed into a file system that is
> propagation private, when it later expires in the originating
> namespace subsequent calls to autofs ->d_automount() for that
> dentry in the original namespace will return E
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:14:45PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> If an automount mount is clone(2)ed into a file system that is
> propagation private, when it later expires in the originating
> namespace subsequent calls to autofs ->d_automount() for that
> dentry in the original namespace will return E
On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 19:47 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ian Kent writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 21:08 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Ian Kent writes:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 12:28 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > > > Ian Kent writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > If
Ian Kent writes:
> On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 21:08 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Ian Kent writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 12:28 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > > Ian Kent writes:
>> > >
>> > > > If an automount mount is clone(2)ed into a file system that is
>> > > > propagation pr
On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 12:12 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 21:08 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Ian Kent writes:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 12:28 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > > Ian Kent writes:
> > > >
> > > > > If an automount mount is clone(2)ed into a file
On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 21:08 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ian Kent writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 12:28 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Ian Kent writes:
> > >
> > > > If an automount mount is clone(2)ed into a file system that is
> > > > propagation private, when it later expires
Ian Kent writes:
> On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 12:28 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Ian Kent writes:
>>
>> > If an automount mount is clone(2)ed into a file system that is
>> > propagation private, when it later expires in the originating
>> > namespace subsequent calls to autofs ->d_automount()
On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 12:28 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ian Kent writes:
>
> > If an automount mount is clone(2)ed into a file system that is
> > propagation private, when it later expires in the originating
> > namespace subsequent calls to autofs ->d_automount() for that
> > dentry in the
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 08:09:23AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 12:28 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Ian Kent writes:
> >
> > > If an automount mount is clone(2)ed into a file system that is
> > > propagation private, when it later expires in the originating
> > > namespace
On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 12:28 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ian Kent writes:
>
> > If an automount mount is clone(2)ed into a file system that is
> > propagation private, when it later expires in the originating
> > namespace subsequent calls to autofs ->d_automount() for that
> > dentry in the
Ian Kent writes:
> If an automount mount is clone(2)ed into a file system that is
> propagation private, when it later expires in the originating
> namespace subsequent calls to autofs ->d_automount() for that
> dentry in the original namespace will return ELOOP until the
> mount is manually umou
If an automount mount is clone(2)ed into a file system that is
propagation private, when it later expires in the originating
namespace subsequent calls to autofs ->d_automount() for that
dentry in the original namespace will return ELOOP until the
mount is manually umounted in the cloned namespace.
31 matches
Mail list logo
