Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses

2018-10-15 Thread Kees Cook
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:08 PM, James Bottomley
 wrote:
> The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing
> private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour.  Since
> the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch
> process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by
> the project to correct this ambiguity.
>
> Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.")
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
> Acked-by: Shuah Khan 
> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck 
> Reviewed-by: Alan Cox 
> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab 
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley 

Acked-by: Kees Cook 

-Kees

> ---
>  Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst 
> b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> index ab7c24b5478c..aa40e34e7785 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
>  * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
>  * Public or private harassment
>  * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic
> -  address, without explicit permission
> +  address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit 
> permission
>  * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
>professional setting
>
> --
> 2.13.7
>



-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security


Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses

2018-10-15 Thread Kees Cook
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:08 PM, James Bottomley
 wrote:
> The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing
> private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour.  Since
> the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch
> process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by
> the project to correct this ambiguity.
>
> Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.")
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
> Acked-by: Shuah Khan 
> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck 
> Reviewed-by: Alan Cox 
> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab 
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley 

Acked-by: Kees Cook 

-Kees

> ---
>  Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst 
> b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> index ab7c24b5478c..aa40e34e7785 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
>  * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
>  * Public or private harassment
>  * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic
> -  address, without explicit permission
> +  address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit 
> permission
>  * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
>professional setting
>
> --
> 2.13.7
>



-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security


Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 1/3] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses

2018-10-10 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:08:35 -0700
James Bottomley  escreveu:

> The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing
> private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour.  Since
> the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch
> process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by
> the project to correct this ambiguity.
> 
> Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.")
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
> Acked-by: Shuah Khan 
> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck 
> Reviewed-by: Alan Cox 
> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab 

In time, please change my reviewed by to:

Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab 

As I'm speaking for myself, not for my employer.

> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley 
> ---
>  Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst 
> b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> index ab7c24b5478c..aa40e34e7785 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
>  * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
>  * Public or private harassment
>  * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic
> -  address, without explicit permission
> +  address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit 
> permission
>  * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
>professional setting
>  



Thanks,
Mauro


Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 1/3] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses

2018-10-10 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:08:35 -0700
James Bottomley  escreveu:

> The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing
> private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour.  Since
> the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch
> process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by
> the project to correct this ambiguity.
> 
> Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.")
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
> Acked-by: Shuah Khan 
> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck 
> Reviewed-by: Alan Cox 
> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab 

In time, please change my reviewed by to:

Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab 

As I'm speaking for myself, not for my employer.

> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley 
> ---
>  Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst 
> b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> index ab7c24b5478c..aa40e34e7785 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
>  * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
>  * Public or private harassment
>  * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic
> -  address, without explicit permission
> +  address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit 
> permission
>  * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
>professional setting
>  



Thanks,
Mauro


Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 1/3] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses

2018-10-10 Thread Eric W. Biederman
James Bottomley  writes:

> The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing
> private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour.  Since
> the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch
> process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by
> the project to correct this ambiguity.

Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" 

>
> Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.")
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
> Acked-by: Shuah Khan 
> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck 
> Reviewed-by: Alan Cox 
> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab 
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley 
> ---
>  Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst 
> b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> index ab7c24b5478c..aa40e34e7785 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
>  * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
>  * Public or private harassment
>  * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic
> -  address, without explicit permission
> +  address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit 
> permission
>  * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
>professional setting


Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 1/3] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses

2018-10-10 Thread Eric W. Biederman
James Bottomley  writes:

> The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing
> private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour.  Since
> the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch
> process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by
> the project to correct this ambiguity.

Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" 

>
> Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.")
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
> Acked-by: Shuah Khan 
> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck 
> Reviewed-by: Alan Cox 
> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab 
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley 
> ---
>  Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst 
> b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> index ab7c24b5478c..aa40e34e7785 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
>  * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
>  * Public or private harassment
>  * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic
> -  address, without explicit permission
> +  address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit 
> permission
>  * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
>professional setting


[PATCH v2 1/3] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses

2018-10-10 Thread James Bottomley
The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing
private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour.  Since
the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch
process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by
the project to correct this ambiguity.

Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.")
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Acked-by: Shuah Khan 
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck 
Reviewed-by: Alan Cox 
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab 
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley 
---
 Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst 
b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
index ab7c24b5478c..aa40e34e7785 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
 * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
 * Public or private harassment
 * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic
-  address, without explicit permission
+  address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit permission
 * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
   professional setting
 
-- 
2.13.7



[PATCH v2 1/3] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses

2018-10-10 Thread James Bottomley
The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing
private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour.  Since
the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch
process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by
the project to correct this ambiguity.

Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.")
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Acked-by: Shuah Khan 
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck 
Reviewed-by: Alan Cox 
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab 
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley 
---
 Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst 
b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
index ab7c24b5478c..aa40e34e7785 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
 * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
 * Public or private harassment
 * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic
-  address, without explicit permission
+  address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit permission
 * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
   professional setting
 
-- 
2.13.7