On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 08:50:57AM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >> There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 08:50:57AM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >> There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least 12
> >> years. It predates git history,
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 12:52:40AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least 12
> > years. It predates git history, and I can't find any good reason for
> >
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 12:52:40AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least 12
> > years. It predates git history, and I can't find any good reason for
> > it. Remove it.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>> There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least 12
>> years. It predates git history, and I can't find any good
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>> There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least 12
>> years. It predates git history, and I can't find any good reason for
>> it. Remove it. What's the
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least 12
> years. It predates git history, and I can't find any good reason for
> it. Remove it. What's the worst that could happen?
I can't think of
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least 12
> years. It predates git history, and I can't find any good reason for
> it. Remove it. What's the worst that could happen?
I can't think of any reason this would
There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least 12
years. It predates git history, and I can't find any good reason for
it. Remove it. What's the worst that could happen?
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf
---
arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h | 3 ---
There has been a 64-byte gap at the end of the irq stack for at least 12
years. It predates git history, and I can't find any good reason for
it. Remove it. What's the worst that could happen?
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf
---
arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h | 3 ---
10 matches
Mail list logo