On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 12:14:29PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
> >> +int _kvm_create_device(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint64_t type, bool test)
> >> +{
> >> + struct kvm_create_device create_dev;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + create_dev.type = type;
> >> + create_dev.fd = -1;
> >> + create_dev.flags =
Hi Drew,
On 4/6/21 5:09 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> It looks like Marc already picked this patch up, but, FWIW, here's
> a few more comments you may consider.
I will send a fixup patch on top of the one taken my Marc. Few comments
below.
>
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 06:39:41PM
On Tue, 06 Apr 2021 16:09:16 +0100,
Andrew Jones wrote:
>
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> It looks like Marc already picked this patch up, but, FWIW, here's
> a few more comments you may consider.
FWIW, I'm happy to drop this patch from the queue (the series is on
its own branch for this reason), or take
Hi Eric,
It looks like Marc already picked this patch up, but, FWIW, here's
a few more comments you may consider.
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 06:39:41PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> The tests exercise the VGIC_V3 device creation including the
> associated KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ADDR group attributes:
The tests exercise the VGIC_V3 device creation including the
associated KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ADDR group attributes:
- KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_DIST/REDIST
- KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST_REGION
Some other tests dedicate to KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_REDIST_REGS group
and especially the GICR_TYPER read.
5 matches
Mail list logo
