Re: [PATCHv2] Coccinelle: remove pci_alloc_consistent semantic to detect in zalloc-simple.cocci

2018-08-19 Thread Masahiro Yamada 
2018-08-18 22:51 GMT+09:00 zhong jiang :
> Because pci_alloc_consistent has been deprecated. We prefer to use
> dma_alloc_coherent directly. Therefore, we should remove pci_alloc_consistent
> to increase the confidence.
>
> Acked-by: Julia Lawall 
> Acked-by: Himanshu Jha 
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang 
> ---
> v1->v2:
>  - fix some spelling mistakes.


Applied to linux-kbuild. Thanks!


>  scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci | 41 
> +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci 
> b/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci
> index 92b2091..d819275 100644
> --- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci
> +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci
> @@ -35,8 +35,7 @@ statement S;
>
>  * x = (T)\(kmalloc(E1, ...)\|vmalloc(E1)\|dma_alloc_coherent(...,E1,...)\|
>kmalloc_node(E1, ...)\|kmem_cache_alloc(...)\|kmem_alloc(E1, ...)\|
> -  devm_kmalloc(...,E1,...)\|kvmalloc(E1, 
> ...)\|pci_alloc_consistent(...,E1,...)\|
> -  kvmalloc_node(E1,...)\);
> +  devm_kmalloc(...,E1,...)\|kvmalloc(E1, ...)\|kvmalloc_node(E1,...)\);
>if ((x==NULL) || ...) S
>  * memset((T2)x,0,E1);
>
> @@ -124,15 +123,6 @@ statement S;
>  - x = (T)kvmalloc(E1,E2);
>  + x = (T)kvzalloc(E1,E2);
>  |
> -- x = pci_alloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
> -+ x = pci_zalloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
> -|
> -- x = (T *)pci_alloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
> -+ x = pci_zalloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
> -|
> -- x = (T)pci_alloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
> -+ x = (T)pci_zalloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
> -|
>  - x = kvmalloc_node(E1,E2,E3);
>  + x = kvzalloc_node(E1,E2,E3);
>  |
> @@ -389,35 +379,6 @@ msg="WARNING: kvzalloc should be used for %s, instead of 
> kvmalloc/memset" % (x)
>  coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], msg)
>
>  //-
> -@r8 depends on org || report@
> -type T, T2;
> -expression x;
> -expression E1,E2,E3;
> -statement S;
> -position p;
> -@@
> -
> - x = (T)pci_alloc_consistent@p(E2,E1,E3);
> - if ((x==NULL) || ...) S
> - memset((T2)x,0,E1);
> -
> -@script:python depends on org@
> -p << r8.p;
> -x << r8.x;
> -@@
> -
> -msg="%s" % (x)
> -msg_safe=msg.replace("[","@(").replace("]",")")
> -coccilib.org.print_todo(p[0], msg_safe)
> -
> -@script:python depends on report@
> -p << r8.p;
> -x << r8.x;
> -@@
> -
> -msg="WARNING: pci_zalloc_consistent should be used for %s, instead of 
> pci_alloc_consistent/memset" % (x)
> -coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], msg)
> -//-
>  @r9 depends on org || report@
>  type T, T2;
>  expression x;
> --
> 1.7.12.4
>



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Re: [PATCHv2] Coccinelle: remove pci_alloc_consistent semantic to detect in zalloc-simple.cocci

2018-08-19 Thread Masahiro Yamada 
2018-08-18 22:51 GMT+09:00 zhong jiang :
> Because pci_alloc_consistent has been deprecated. We prefer to use
> dma_alloc_coherent directly. Therefore, we should remove pci_alloc_consistent
> to increase the confidence.
>
> Acked-by: Julia Lawall 
> Acked-by: Himanshu Jha 
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang 
> ---
> v1->v2:
>  - fix some spelling mistakes.


Applied to linux-kbuild. Thanks!


>  scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci | 41 
> +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci 
> b/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci
> index 92b2091..d819275 100644
> --- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci
> +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci
> @@ -35,8 +35,7 @@ statement S;
>
>  * x = (T)\(kmalloc(E1, ...)\|vmalloc(E1)\|dma_alloc_coherent(...,E1,...)\|
>kmalloc_node(E1, ...)\|kmem_cache_alloc(...)\|kmem_alloc(E1, ...)\|
> -  devm_kmalloc(...,E1,...)\|kvmalloc(E1, 
> ...)\|pci_alloc_consistent(...,E1,...)\|
> -  kvmalloc_node(E1,...)\);
> +  devm_kmalloc(...,E1,...)\|kvmalloc(E1, ...)\|kvmalloc_node(E1,...)\);
>if ((x==NULL) || ...) S
>  * memset((T2)x,0,E1);
>
> @@ -124,15 +123,6 @@ statement S;
>  - x = (T)kvmalloc(E1,E2);
>  + x = (T)kvzalloc(E1,E2);
>  |
> -- x = pci_alloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
> -+ x = pci_zalloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
> -|
> -- x = (T *)pci_alloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
> -+ x = pci_zalloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
> -|
> -- x = (T)pci_alloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
> -+ x = (T)pci_zalloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
> -|
>  - x = kvmalloc_node(E1,E2,E3);
>  + x = kvzalloc_node(E1,E2,E3);
>  |
> @@ -389,35 +379,6 @@ msg="WARNING: kvzalloc should be used for %s, instead of 
> kvmalloc/memset" % (x)
>  coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], msg)
>
>  //-
> -@r8 depends on org || report@
> -type T, T2;
> -expression x;
> -expression E1,E2,E3;
> -statement S;
> -position p;
> -@@
> -
> - x = (T)pci_alloc_consistent@p(E2,E1,E3);
> - if ((x==NULL) || ...) S
> - memset((T2)x,0,E1);
> -
> -@script:python depends on org@
> -p << r8.p;
> -x << r8.x;
> -@@
> -
> -msg="%s" % (x)
> -msg_safe=msg.replace("[","@(").replace("]",")")
> -coccilib.org.print_todo(p[0], msg_safe)
> -
> -@script:python depends on report@
> -p << r8.p;
> -x << r8.x;
> -@@
> -
> -msg="WARNING: pci_zalloc_consistent should be used for %s, instead of 
> pci_alloc_consistent/memset" % (x)
> -coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], msg)
> -//-
>  @r9 depends on org || report@
>  type T, T2;
>  expression x;
> --
> 1.7.12.4
>



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

[PATCHv2] Coccinelle: remove pci_alloc_consistent semantic to detect in zalloc-simple.cocci

2018-08-18 Thread zhong jiang 
Because pci_alloc_consistent has been deprecated. We prefer to use
dma_alloc_coherent directly. Therefore, we should remove pci_alloc_consistent
to increase the confidence.

Acked-by: Julia Lawall 
Acked-by: Himanshu Jha 
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang 
---
v1->v2:
 - fix some spelling mistakes.  

 scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci | 41 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci 
b/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci
index 92b2091..d819275 100644
--- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci
+++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci
@@ -35,8 +35,7 @@ statement S;
 
 * x = (T)\(kmalloc(E1, ...)\|vmalloc(E1)\|dma_alloc_coherent(...,E1,...)\|
   kmalloc_node(E1, ...)\|kmem_cache_alloc(...)\|kmem_alloc(E1, ...)\|
-  devm_kmalloc(...,E1,...)\|kvmalloc(E1, 
...)\|pci_alloc_consistent(...,E1,...)\|
-  kvmalloc_node(E1,...)\);
+  devm_kmalloc(...,E1,...)\|kvmalloc(E1, ...)\|kvmalloc_node(E1,...)\);
   if ((x==NULL) || ...) S
 * memset((T2)x,0,E1);
 
@@ -124,15 +123,6 @@ statement S;
 - x = (T)kvmalloc(E1,E2);
 + x = (T)kvzalloc(E1,E2);
 |
-- x = pci_alloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
-+ x = pci_zalloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
-|
-- x = (T *)pci_alloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
-+ x = pci_zalloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
-|
-- x = (T)pci_alloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
-+ x = (T)pci_zalloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
-|
 - x = kvmalloc_node(E1,E2,E3);
 + x = kvzalloc_node(E1,E2,E3);
 |
@@ -389,35 +379,6 @@ msg="WARNING: kvzalloc should be used for %s, instead of 
kvmalloc/memset" % (x)
 coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], msg)
 
 //-
-@r8 depends on org || report@
-type T, T2;
-expression x;
-expression E1,E2,E3;
-statement S;
-position p;
-@@
-
- x = (T)pci_alloc_consistent@p(E2,E1,E3);
- if ((x==NULL) || ...) S
- memset((T2)x,0,E1);
-
-@script:python depends on org@
-p << r8.p;
-x << r8.x;
-@@
-
-msg="%s" % (x)
-msg_safe=msg.replace("[","@(").replace("]",")")
-coccilib.org.print_todo(p[0], msg_safe)
-
-@script:python depends on report@
-p << r8.p;
-x << r8.x;
-@@
-
-msg="WARNING: pci_zalloc_consistent should be used for %s, instead of 
pci_alloc_consistent/memset" % (x)
-coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], msg)
-//-
 @r9 depends on org || report@
 type T, T2;
 expression x;
-- 
1.7.12.4

[PATCHv2] Coccinelle: remove pci_alloc_consistent semantic to detect in zalloc-simple.cocci

2018-08-18 Thread zhong jiang 
Because pci_alloc_consistent has been deprecated. We prefer to use
dma_alloc_coherent directly. Therefore, we should remove pci_alloc_consistent
to increase the confidence.

Acked-by: Julia Lawall 
Acked-by: Himanshu Jha 
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang 
---
v1->v2:
 - fix some spelling mistakes.  

 scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci | 41 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci 
b/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci
index 92b2091..d819275 100644
--- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci
+++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci
@@ -35,8 +35,7 @@ statement S;
 
 * x = (T)\(kmalloc(E1, ...)\|vmalloc(E1)\|dma_alloc_coherent(...,E1,...)\|
   kmalloc_node(E1, ...)\|kmem_cache_alloc(...)\|kmem_alloc(E1, ...)\|
-  devm_kmalloc(...,E1,...)\|kvmalloc(E1, 
...)\|pci_alloc_consistent(...,E1,...)\|
-  kvmalloc_node(E1,...)\);
+  devm_kmalloc(...,E1,...)\|kvmalloc(E1, ...)\|kvmalloc_node(E1,...)\);
   if ((x==NULL) || ...) S
 * memset((T2)x,0,E1);
 
@@ -124,15 +123,6 @@ statement S;
 - x = (T)kvmalloc(E1,E2);
 + x = (T)kvzalloc(E1,E2);
 |
-- x = pci_alloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
-+ x = pci_zalloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
-|
-- x = (T *)pci_alloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
-+ x = pci_zalloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
-|
-- x = (T)pci_alloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
-+ x = (T)pci_zalloc_consistent(E2,E1,E3);
-|
 - x = kvmalloc_node(E1,E2,E3);
 + x = kvzalloc_node(E1,E2,E3);
 |
@@ -389,35 +379,6 @@ msg="WARNING: kvzalloc should be used for %s, instead of 
kvmalloc/memset" % (x)
 coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], msg)
 
 //-
-@r8 depends on org || report@
-type T, T2;
-expression x;
-expression E1,E2,E3;
-statement S;
-position p;
-@@
-
- x = (T)pci_alloc_consistent@p(E2,E1,E3);
- if ((x==NULL) || ...) S
- memset((T2)x,0,E1);
-
-@script:python depends on org@
-p << r8.p;
-x << r8.x;
-@@
-
-msg="%s" % (x)
-msg_safe=msg.replace("[","@(").replace("]",")")
-coccilib.org.print_todo(p[0], msg_safe)
-
-@script:python depends on report@
-p << r8.p;
-x << r8.x;
-@@
-
-msg="WARNING: pci_zalloc_consistent should be used for %s, instead of 
pci_alloc_consistent/memset" % (x)
-coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], msg)
-//-
 @r9 depends on org || report@
 type T, T2;
 expression x;
-- 
1.7.12.4