Hi,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 05:39:37PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 09/13/2012 01:18 AM, Vasilis Liaskovitis Wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:20:28PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> Hmm, seabios doesn't support ACPI table SLIT. We can specify node it for
> >> dimm
> >>
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 05:39:37PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 09/13/2012 01:18 AM, Vasilis Liaskovitis Wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:20:28PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
Hmm, seabios doesn't support ACPI table SLIT. We can specify node it for
dimm
device, so I think we
At 09/13/2012 01:18 AM, Vasilis Liaskovitis Wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:20:28PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:01:44AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 09/10/2012 09:46 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
> How do you test the patch? As Andrew says,
At 09/13/2012 01:18 AM, Vasilis Liaskovitis Wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:20:28PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:01:44AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 09/10/2012 09:46 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
How do you test the patch? As Andrew says, for hot-removing
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:20:28PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:01:44AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> At 09/10/2012 09:46 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
> >>> How do you test the patch? As Andrew says, for hot-removing memory,
> >>> we need a particular
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 01:18:24PM +0800, Jerry wrote:
> Hi Kim,
>
> Thank you for your kindness. Let me clarify this:
>
> On ARM architecture, there are 32 bits physical addresses space. However,
> the addresses space is divided into 8 banks normally. Each bank
> disabled/enabled by a chip
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 01:18:24PM +0800, Jerry wrote:
Hi Kim,
Thank you for your kindness. Let me clarify this:
On ARM architecture, there are 32 bits physical addresses space. However,
the addresses space is divided into 8 banks normally. Each bank
disabled/enabled by a chip selector
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:20:28PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:01:44AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 09/10/2012 09:46 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
How do you test the patch? As Andrew says, for hot-removing memory,
we need a particular hardware. I think so
At 09/10/2012 09:52 PM, Vasilis Liaskovitis Wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:01:44AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 09/10/2012 09:46 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
>>> Hi Wen,
>>>
>>> 2012/09/01 5:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:00:07 +0800
At 09/10/2012 09:52 PM, Vasilis Liaskovitis Wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:01:44AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 09/10/2012 09:46 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
Hi Wen,
2012/09/01 5:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:00:07 +0800
we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
This patch
At 09/11/2012 01:18 PM, Jerry Wrote:
> Hi Kim,
>
> Thank you for your kindness. Let me clarify this:
>
> On ARM architecture, there are 32 bits physical addresses space. However,
> the addresses space is divided into 8 banks normally. Each bank
> disabled/enabled by a chip selector signal. In my
Hi Jerry,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 08:27:40AM +0800, Jerry wrote:
> Hi Wen,
>
> I have been arranged a job related memory hotplug on ARM architecture.
> Maybe I know some new issues about memory hotplug on ARM architecture. I
> just enabled it on ARM, and it works well in my Android tablet now.
>
At 09/11/2012 08:27 AM, Jerry Wrote:
> Hi Wen,
>
> I have been arranged a job related memory hotplug on ARM architecture.
> Maybe I know some new issues about memory hotplug on ARM architecture. I
> just enabled it on ARM, and it works well in my Android tablet now.
> However, I have not send out
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:01:44AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 09/10/2012 09:46 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
> > Hi Wen,
> >
> > 2012/09/01 5:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:00:07 +0800
> >> we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> This patch series aims to support
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:01:44AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 09/10/2012 09:46 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
Hi Wen,
2012/09/01 5:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:00:07 +0800
we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
This patch series aims to support physical memory
At 09/11/2012 08:27 AM, Jerry Wrote:
Hi Wen,
I have been arranged a job related memory hotplug on ARM architecture.
Maybe I know some new issues about memory hotplug on ARM architecture. I
just enabled it on ARM, and it works well in my Android tablet now.
However, I have not send out my
Hi Jerry,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 08:27:40AM +0800, Jerry wrote:
Hi Wen,
I have been arranged a job related memory hotplug on ARM architecture.
Maybe I know some new issues about memory hotplug on ARM architecture. I
just enabled it on ARM, and it works well in my Android tablet now.
At 09/11/2012 01:18 PM, Jerry Wrote:
Hi Kim,
Thank you for your kindness. Let me clarify this:
On ARM architecture, there are 32 bits physical addresses space. However,
the addresses space is divided into 8 banks normally. Each bank
disabled/enabled by a chip selector signal. In my
At 09/10/2012 09:46 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
> Hi Wen,
>
> 2012/09/01 5:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:00:07 +0800
>> we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
>>
>>> This patch series aims to support physical memory hot-remove.
>>
>> Have you had much review and testing feedback yet?
Hi Wen,
2012/09/01 5:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:00:07 +0800
we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
This patch series aims to support physical memory hot-remove.
Have you had much review and testing feedback yet?
The patches can free/remove the following things:
-
Hi Wen,
2012/09/01 5:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:00:07 +0800
we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
This patch series aims to support physical memory hot-remove.
Have you had much review and testing feedback yet?
The patches can free/remove the following things:
-
At 09/10/2012 09:46 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
Hi Wen,
2012/09/01 5:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:00:07 +0800
we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
This patch series aims to support physical memory hot-remove.
Have you had much review and testing feedback yet?
The patches can
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:00:07 +0800
we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
> This patch series aims to support physical memory hot-remove.
Have you had much review and testing feedback yet?
> The patches can free/remove the following things:
>
> - acpi_memory_info : [RFC PATCH
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:00:07 +0800
we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
This patch series aims to support physical memory hot-remove.
Have you had much review and testing feedback yet?
The patches can free/remove the following things:
- acpi_memory_info : [RFC PATCH 4/19]
From: Wen Congyang
This patch series aims to support physical memory hot-remove.
The patches can free/remove the following things:
- acpi_memory_info : [RFC PATCH 4/19]
- /sys/firmware/memmap/X/{end, start, type} : [RFC PATCH 8/19]
- iomem_resource
From: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
This patch series aims to support physical memory hot-remove.
The patches can free/remove the following things:
- acpi_memory_info : [RFC PATCH 4/19]
- /sys/firmware/memmap/X/{end, start, type} : [RFC PATCH 8/19]
-
26 matches
Mail list logo
