Re: [stable] 2.6.19.2 regression introduced by "IPV4/IPV6: Fix inet{, 6} device initialization order."

2007-01-15 Thread David Miller
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:06:30 +0900 (JST) > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 16 Jan 2007 03:01:56 +0100), Gabriel > C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > > > Should be the fix from http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7817 > > I've resent the

Re: [stable] 2.6.19.2 regression introduced by "IPV4/IPV6: Fix inet{, 6} device initialization order."

2007-01-15 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 16 Jan 2007 03:01:56 +0100), Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > Greg KH schrieb: > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 09:30:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > > >> From: David Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:47:49 -0800 > >> > >>

Re: [stable] 2.6.19.2 regression introduced by "IPV4/IPV6: Fix inet{, 6} device initialization order."

2007-01-15 Thread Gabriel C
Greg KH schrieb: > On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 09:30:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > >> From: David Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:47:49 -0800 >> >> >>> I think it's better to add the fix than withdraw this patch, since >>> the original bug is a crash. >>> >>

Re: [stable] 2.6.19.2 regression introduced by IPV4/IPV6: Fix inet{, 6} device initialization order.

2007-01-15 Thread Gabriel C
Greg KH schrieb: On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 09:30:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote: From: David Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:47:49 -0800 I think it's better to add the fix than withdraw this patch, since the original bug is a crash. I completely agree.

Re: [stable] 2.6.19.2 regression introduced by IPV4/IPV6: Fix inet{, 6} device initialization order.

2007-01-15 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Tue, 16 Jan 2007 03:01:56 +0100), Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] says: Greg KH schrieb: On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 09:30:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote: From: David Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:47:49 -0800 I think it's

Re: [stable] 2.6.19.2 regression introduced by IPV4/IPV6: Fix inet{, 6} device initialization order.

2007-01-15 Thread David Miller
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:06:30 +0900 (JST) In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Tue, 16 Jan 2007 03:01:56 +0100), Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] says: Should be the fix from http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7817 I've resent the patch to

Re: [stable] 2.6.19.2 regression introduced by "IPV4/IPV6: Fix inet{, 6} device initialization order."

2007-01-14 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 09:30:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: David Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:47:49 -0800 > > > I think it's better to add the fix than withdraw this patch, since > > the original bug is a crash. > > I completely agree. Great, can someone

Re: [stable] 2.6.19.2 regression introduced by IPV4/IPV6: Fix inet{, 6} device initialization order.

2007-01-14 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 09:30:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote: From: David Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:47:49 -0800 I think it's better to add the fix than withdraw this patch, since the original bug is a crash. I completely agree. Great, can someone forward the