On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 14:19 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
[]
> > And here I submitted patches:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/30/176
> Ah, I see some of this series landed. I see commits scattered in the
> tree, but not as many
On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 14:19 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
[]
> > And here I submitted patches:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/30/176
> Ah, I see some of this series landed. I see commits scattered in the
> tree, but not as many as you sent, I
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 12:00 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 11:53 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
>> >
>> > #ifndef
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 12:00 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 11:53 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
>> >
>> > #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
>> >
On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 12:00 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 11:53 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
> >
> > #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
> > #define BUG() do { \
> > printk("BUG: failure at
On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 12:00 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 11:53 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
> >
> > #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
> > #define BUG() do { \
> > printk("BUG: failure at
On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 13:28 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 11:53 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
> > >
> > > #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
> >
On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 13:28 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 11:53 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
> > >
> > > #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
> > > #define BUG()
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 11:53 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
>>
>> #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
>> #define BUG() do { \
>>printk("BUG: failure at
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 11:53 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
>>
>> #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
>> #define BUG() do { \
>>printk("BUG: failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n",
On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 11:53 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
>
> #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
> #define BUG() do { \
> printk("BUG: failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);
> \
>
> Seems like it should
On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 11:53 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
>
> #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
> #define BUG() do { \
> printk("BUG: failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);
> \
>
> Seems like it should
Hi,
So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
#define BUG() do { \
printk("BUG: failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); \
Seems like it should have one?
Also, I think we might want to examine WARN() a bit... it
Hi,
So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
#define BUG() do { \
printk("BUG: failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); \
Seems like it should have one?
Also, I think we might want to examine WARN() a bit... it
14 matches
Mail list logo