On 10/01/2013 01:44 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Right, but it looks quite strange to have this thread just for a
> (probably) quite rare event. Maybe some day someone will work out how
> to make Octeon's IRQ management less unusual and then you can use the
> simpler approach for RT...
We have
On 10/01/2013 01:44 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Right, but it looks quite strange to have this thread just for a
(probably) quite rare event. Maybe some day someone will work out how
to make Octeon's IRQ management less unusual and then you can use the
simpler approach for RT...
We have three
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 14:58 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 08/30/2013 11:29 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Sebastian, I saw you came up with a fix for this but apparently without
> > seeing my earlier message:
>
> Yes Ben, I haven't seen it. If I was on Cc I very sorry for overlooking
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 14:58 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 08/30/2013 11:29 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Sebastian, I saw you came up with a fix for this but apparently without
seeing my earlier message:
Yes Ben, I haven't seen it. If I was on Cc I very sorry for overlooking
it.
On 08/30/2013 11:29 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Sebastian, I saw you came up with a fix for this but apparently without
> seeing my earlier message:
Yes Ben, I haven't seen it. If I was on Cc I very sorry for overlooking
it.
> On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 00:31 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> Workqueue
On 08/30/2013 11:29 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Sebastian, I saw you came up with a fix for this but apparently without
seeing my earlier message:
Yes Ben, I haven't seen it. If I was on Cc I very sorry for overlooking
it.
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 00:31 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Workqueue code
Sebastian, I saw you came up with a fix for this but apparently without
seeing my earlier message:
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 00:31 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Alexandra Kossovsky reported the following lockdep splat when testing an
> out-of-tree version of sfc on 3.6-rt. The problem is specific to
Sebastian, I saw you came up with a fix for this but apparently without
seeing my earlier message:
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 00:31 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Alexandra Kossovsky reported the following lockdep splat when testing an
out-of-tree version of sfc on 3.6-rt. The problem is specific to
Alexandra Kossovsky reported the following lockdep splat when testing an
out-of-tree version of sfc on 3.6-rt. The problem is specific to RT,
and we haven't tested anything later but I think it's still unfixed.
> ==
> [ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe ->
Alexandra Kossovsky reported the following lockdep splat when testing an
out-of-tree version of sfc on 3.6-rt. The problem is specific to RT,
and we haven't tested anything later but I think it's still unfixed.
==
[ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -
10 matches
Mail list logo
