Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by "cat /proc/iomem" AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)

2007-12-21 Thread Miles Lane
On Dec 21, 2007 3:00 PM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:06:49 -0500 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > How do I determine what comes next? > > > > > > > > > > By comparing it with the /proc/iomem from prior to suspending the machine. > > >

Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by "cat /proc/iomem" AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)

2007-12-21 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:06:49 -0500 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > How do I determine what comes next? > > > > > > > By comparing it with the /proc/iomem from prior to suspending the machine. > > > > The offending information seems to be "9000-9fff : Intel Flush Page"

Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by "cat /proc/iomem" AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)

2007-12-21 Thread Miles Lane
On Dec 21, 2007 1:29 AM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:58:19 -0500 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 20, 2007 12:32 PM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:38:03 -0500 Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >

Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by cat /proc/iomem AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)

2007-12-21 Thread Miles Lane
On Dec 21, 2007 1:29 AM, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:58:19 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 20, 2007 12:32 PM, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:38:03 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On

Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by cat /proc/iomem AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)

2007-12-21 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:06:49 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do I determine what comes next? By comparing it with the /proc/iomem from prior to suspending the machine. The offending information seems to be 9000-9fff : Intel Flush Page ah-hah.

Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by cat /proc/iomem AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)

2007-12-21 Thread Miles Lane
On Dec 21, 2007 3:00 PM, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:06:49 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do I determine what comes next? By comparing it with the /proc/iomem from prior to suspending the machine. The offending information

Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by "cat /proc/iomem" AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)

2007-12-20 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:58:19 -0500 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 20, 2007 12:32 PM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:38:03 -0500 Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > On further investigation, "cat /proc/iomem" does not

Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by "cat /proc/iomem" AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)

2007-12-20 Thread Miles Lane
Resending... Curse GMail's HTML messages! On Dec 21, 2007 12:58 AM, Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 20, 2007 12:32 PM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:38:03 -0500 Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On further investigation, "cat

Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by "cat /proc/iomem" AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)

2007-12-20 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:38:03 -0500 Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On further investigation, "cat /proc/iomem" does not trigger the stack > trace until after a suspend-to-disk/resume cycle has occurred. I still can't reproduce this. Could you please try this? - cat /proc/iomem -

Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by "cat /proc/iomem" AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)

2007-12-20 Thread Miles Lane
On further investigation, "cat /proc/iomem" does not trigger the stack trace until after a suspend-to-disk/resume cycle has occurred. I am removing Ingo and Russell from the TO list (as they are apparently the wrong people) and adding the suspend folks, as suspend is implicated. My .config

Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by cat /proc/iomem AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)

2007-12-20 Thread Miles Lane
On further investigation, cat /proc/iomem does not trigger the stack trace until after a suspend-to-disk/resume cycle has occurred. I am removing Ingo and Russell from the TO list (as they are apparently the wrong people) and adding the suspend folks, as suspend is implicated. My .config file

Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by cat /proc/iomem AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)

2007-12-20 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:38:03 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On further investigation, cat /proc/iomem does not trigger the stack trace until after a suspend-to-disk/resume cycle has occurred. I still can't reproduce this. Could you please try this? - cat /proc/iomem -

Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by cat /proc/iomem AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)

2007-12-20 Thread Miles Lane
Resending... Curse GMail's HTML messages! On Dec 21, 2007 12:58 AM, Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 20, 2007 12:32 PM, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:38:03 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On further investigation, cat /proc/iomem does

Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by cat /proc/iomem AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)

2007-12-20 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:58:19 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 20, 2007 12:32 PM, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:38:03 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On further investigation, cat /proc/iomem does not trigger the stack trace